Widely adopted for more than 20 years in industrial fields, business rules offer the opportunity to non-IT users to define decision-making policies in a simple and intuitive way. When used conjointly with probabilistic graphical models (PGM) their expressiveness increase by introducing the notion of probabilistic production rules (PPR). In this paper we will present a new model for PPR and suggest a way to handle the combinatorial explosion due to the number of parents of aggregators in PGM such as Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Relational Models in an industrial context where marginals should be computed rapidly.

In many applications labeled data is not readily available, and needs to be collected via painstaking human supervision. We propose a rule-exemplar method for collecting human supervision to combine the efficiency of rules with the quality of instance labels. The supervision is coupled such that it is both natural for humans and synergistic for learning. We propose a training algorithm that jointly denoises rules via latent coverage variables, and trains the model through a soft implication loss over the coverage and label variables. The denoised rules and trained model are used jointly for inference. Empirical evaluation on five different tasks shows that (1) our algorithm is more accurate than several existing methods of learning from a mix of clean and noisy supervision, and (2) the coupled rule-exemplar supervision is effective in denoising rules. With the ever-increasing reach of machine learning, a common hurdle to new adoptions is the lack of labeled data and the painstaking process involved in collecting human supervision. Over the years, several strategies have evolved.

This article is part of Demystifying AI, a series of posts that (try to) disambiguate the jargon and myths surrounding AI. From ancient mythology to modern science fiction, humans have been dreaming of creating artificial intelligence for millennia. But the endeavor of synthesizing intelligence only began in earnest in the late 1950s, when a dozen scientists gathered in Dartmouth College, NH, for a two-month workshop to create machines that could "use language, form abstractions and concepts, solve kinds of problems now reserved for humans, and improve themselves." The workshop marked the official beginning of AI history. But as the two-month effort--and many others that followed--only proved that human intelligence is very complicated, and the complexity becomes more evident as you try to replicate it.

This paper describes implementation details for a 3-level cognitive model, described in the paper series. The whole architecture is now modular, with different levels using different types of information. The ensemble-hierarchy relationship is maintained and placed in the bottom optimising and middle aggregating levels, to store memory objects and their relations. The top-level cognitive layer has been re-designed to model the Cognitive Process Language (CPL) of an earlier paper, by refactoring it into a network structure with a light scheduler. The cortex brain region is thought to be hierarchical - clustering from simple to more complex features. The refactored network might therefore challenge conventional thinking on that brain region. It is also argued that the function and structure in particular, of the new top level, is similar to the psychology theory of chunking. The model is still only a framework and does not have enough information for real intelligence. But a framework is now implemented over the whole design and so can give a more complete picture about the potential for results.

This paper focuses on Crime zone Identification. Then, it clarifies how we conducted the Belief Rule Base algorithm to produce interesting frequent patterns for crime hotspots. The paper also shows how we used an expert system to forecast potential types of crime. In order to further analyze the crime datasets, the paper introduces an analysis study by combining our findings of the Chittagong crime dataset with demographic information to capture factors that could affect neighborhood safety. The results of this solution could be used to raise awareness of the dangerous locations and to help agencies predict future crimes at a specific location in a given time.

Fuzzy rule-based model is a powerful tool for imitating the human way of thinking and solving uncertainty-related problems as it allows for understandable and interpretable rule bases. The objective of this paper is to study the applicability of fuzzy rule-based modelling to quantify soil classification for engineering purposes by qualitatively considering soil index properties. The classification system of the Highway Research Board is considered to illustrate a fuzzy rule-based model. The soil's index properties are fuzzified using triangular functions, and the fuzzy membership values are calculated. Fuzzy arithmetical operators are then applied to the membership values obtained for classification. Fuzzy decision tree classification algorithm is used to derive fuzzy if-then rules to quantify qualitative soil classification. The proposed system is implemented in MATLAB. The results obtained are checked and the implementation of the proposed model is measured against the outcomes of the laboratory tests.

To build Sounding Board, we develop a system architecture that is capable of accommodating dialog strategies that we designed for socialbot conversations. The architecture consists of a multi-dimensional language understanding module for analyzing user utterances, a hierarchical dialog management framework for dialog context tracking and complex dialog control, and a language generation process that realizes the response plan and makes adjustments for speech synthesis. Additionally, we construct a new knowledge base to power the socialbot by collecting social chat content from a variety of sources. An important contribution of the system is the synergy between the knowledge base and the dialog management, i.e., the use of a graph structure to organize the knowledge base that makes dialog control very efficient in bringing related content to the discussion. Using the data collected from Sounding Board during the competition, we carry out in-depth analyses of socialbot conversations and user ratings which provide valuable insights in evaluation methods for socialbots. We additionally investigate a new approach for system evaluation and diagnosis that allows scoring individual dialog segments in the conversation. Finally, observing that socialbots suffer from the issue of shallow conversations about topics associated with unstructured data, we study the problem of enabling extended socialbot conversations grounded on a document. To bring together machine reading and dialog control techniques, a graph-based document representation is proposed, together with methods for automatically constructing the graph. Using the graph-based representation, dialog control can be carried out by retrieving nodes or moving along edges in the graph. To illustrate the usage, a mixed-initiative dialog strategy is designed for socialbot conversations on news articles.

Association learning is a rule based machine learning and data mining technique that finds important relations between variables or features in a data set. Unlike conventional association algorithms measuring degrees of similarity, association rule learning identifies hidden correlations in databases by applying some measure of interestingness to generate an association rule for new searches.

Walk-based models have shown their unique advantages in knowledge graph (KG) reasoning by achieving state-of-the-art performance while allowing for explicit visualization of the decision sequence. However, the sparse reward signals offered by the KG during a traversal are often insufficient to guide a sophisticated reinforcement learning (RL) model. An alternate approach to KG reasoning is using traditional symbolic methods (e.g., rule induction), which achieve high precision without learning but are hard to generalize due to the limitation of symbolic representation. In this paper, we propose to fuse these two paradigms to get the best of both worlds. Our method leverages high-quality rules generated by symbolic-based methods to provide reward supervision for walk-based agents. Due to the structure of symbolic rules with their entity variables, we can separate our walk-based agent into two sub-agents thus allowing for additional efficiency. Experiments on public datasets demonstrate that walk-based models can benefit from rule guidance significantly.

Traditionally, industry solutions for building a task-oriented dialog system have relied on helping dialog authors define rule-based dialog managers, represented as dialog flows. While dialog flows are intuitively interpretable and good for simple scenarios, they fall short of performance in terms of the flexibility needed to handle complex dialogs. On the other hand, purely machine-learned models can handle complex dialogs, but they are considered to be black boxes and require large amounts of training data. In this demonstration, we showcase Conversation Learner, a machine teaching tool for building dialog managers. It combines the best of both approaches by enabling dialog authors to create a dialog flow using familiar tools, converting the dialog flow into a parametric model (e.g., neural networks), and allowing dialog authors to improve the dialog manager (i.e., the parametric model) over time by leveraging user-system dialog logs as training data through a machine teaching interface.