Machine learning: a computer observes some data, builds a model based on the data, and uses the model as both a hypothesis about the world and a piece of software that can solve problems, According to the book'Artificial Intelligence, a modern approach'. Machine learning is a division of artificial intelligence (AI) focused on computational programs that learn from experience and improve decision-making or predictive accuracy over time. In this podcast, our focus will be to go through very basics concepts of machine learning along with the different methods of machine learning, for example, supervised learning, unsupervised learning, reinforcement learning, and Semi-supervised machine learning. Machine learning is not a'Rule-Based Approach' which was common in 1980

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly more popular and can be found in workplaces and homes around the world. However, how do we ensure trust in these systems? Regulation changes such as the GDPR mean that users have a right to understand how their data has been processed as well as saved. Therefore if, for example, you are denied a loan you have the right to ask why. This can be hard if the method for working this out uses "black box" machine learning techniques such as neural networks. TrustyAI is a new initiative which looks into explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) solutions to address trustworthiness in ML as well as decision services landscapes. In this paper we will look at how TrustyAI can support trust in decision services and predictive models. We investigate techniques such as LIME, SHAP and counterfactuals, benchmarking both LIME and counterfactual techniques against existing implementations. We also look into an extended version of SHAP, which supports background data selection to be evaluated based on quantitative data and allows for error bounds.

Rules embody a set of if-then statements which include one or more conditions to classify a subset of samples in a dataset. In various applications such classification rules are considered to be interpretable by the decision makers. We introduce two new algorithms for interpretability and learning. Both algorithms take advantage of linear programming, and hence, they are scalable to large data sets. The first algorithm extracts rules for interpretation of trained models that are based on tree/rule ensembles. The second algorithm generates a set of classification rules through a column generation approach. The proposed algorithms return a set of rules along with their optimal weights indicating the importance of each rule for classification. Moreover, our algorithms allow assigning cost coefficients, which could relate to different attributes of the rules, such as; rule lengths, estimator weights, number of false negatives, and so on. Thus, the decision makers can adjust these coefficients to divert the training process and obtain a set of rules that are more appealing for their needs. We have tested the performances of both algorithms on a collection of datasets and presented a case study to elaborate on optimal rule weights. Our results show that a good compromise between interpretability and accuracy can be obtained by the proposed algorithms.

It's a cold winter day in Detroit, but the sun is shining bright. Robert Williams decided to spend some quality time rolling on his house's front loan with his two daughters. Suddenly, police officers appeared from nowhere and brought to an abrupt halt a perfect family day. Robert was ripped from the arms of his crying daughters without an explanation, and cold handcuffs now gripped his hands. The police took him away in no time! His family were left shaken in disbelief at the scene which had unfolded in front of their eyes. What followed for Robert were 30 long hours in police custody.

Event schemas are structured knowledge sources defining typical real-world scenarios (e.g., going to an airport). We present a framework for efficient human-in-the-loop construction of a schema library, based on a novel mechanism for schema induction and a wellcrafted interface that allows non-experts to "program" complex event structures. Associated with this work we release a machine readable resource (schema library) of 232 detailed event schemas, each of which describe a distinct typical scenario in terms of its relevant sub-event structure (what happens in the scenario), participants (who plays a role in the scenario), fine-grained typing of each participant, and the implied relational constraints Figure 1: An example schema from our schema library, between them. Our custom annotation interface, induced from a skeleton mined by Causal ARM (Section SchemaBlocks, and the event schemas 3) and fully fleshed out by an annotator using our are available online.

For real-world deployments, it is critical to allow robots to navigate in complex environments autonomously. Traditional methods usually maintain an internal map of the environment, and then design several simple rules, in conjunction with a localization and planning approach, to navigate through the internal map. These approaches often involve a variety of assumptions and prior knowledge. In contrast, recent reinforcement learning (RL) methods can provide a model-free, self-learning mechanism as the robot interacts with an initially unknown environment, but are expensive to deploy in real-world scenarios due to inefficient exploration. In this paper, we focus on efficient navigation with the RL technique and combine the advantages of these two kinds of methods into a rule-based RL (RuRL) algorithm for reducing the sample complexity and cost of time. First, we use the rule of wall-following to generate a closed-loop trajectory. Second, we employ a reduction rule to shrink the trajectory, which in turn effectively reduces the redundant exploration space. Besides, we give the detailed theoretical guarantee that the optimal navigation path is still in the reduced space. Third, in the reduced space, we utilize the Pledge rule to guide the exploration strategy for accelerating the RL process at the early stage. Experiments conducted on real robot navigation problems in hex-grid environments demonstrate that RuRL can achieve improved navigation performance.

Multi-hop reasoning has been widely studied in recent years to obtain more interpretable link prediction. However, we find in experiments that many paths given by these models are actually unreasonable, while little works have been done on interpretability evaluation for them. In this paper, we propose a unified framework to quantitatively evaluate the interpretability of multi-hop reasoning models so as to advance their development. In specific, we define three metrics including path recall, local interpretability, and global interpretability for evaluation, and design an approximate strategy to calculate them using the interpretability scores of rules. Furthermore, we manually annotate all possible rules and establish a Benchmark to detect the Interpretability of Multi-hop Reasoning (BIMR). In experiments, we run nine baselines on our benchmark. The experimental results show that the interpretability of current multi-hop reasoning models is less satisfactory and is still far from the upper bound given by our benchmark. Moreover, the rule-based models outperform the multi-hop reasoning models in terms of performance and interpretability, which points to a direction for future research, i.e., we should investigate how to better incorporate rule information into the multi-hop reasoning model. Our codes and datasets can be obtained from https://github.com/THU-KEG/BIMR.

Interactions between several features sometimes play an important role in prediction tasks. But taking all the interactions into consideration will lead to an extremely heavy computational burden. For categorical features, the situation is more complicated since the input will be extremely high-dimensional and sparse if one-hot encoding is applied. Inspired by association rule mining, we propose a method that selects interactions of categorical features, called Random Intersection Chains. It uses random intersections to detect frequent patterns, then selects the most meaningful ones among them. At first a number of chains are generated, in which each node is the intersection of the previous node and a random chosen observation. The frequency of patterns in the tail nodes is estimated by maximum likelihood estimation, then the patterns with largest estimated frequency are selected. After that, their confidence is calculated by Bayes' theorem. The most confident patterns are finally returned by Random Intersection Chains. We show that if the number and length of chains are appropriately chosen, the patterns in the tail nodes are indeed the most frequent ones in the data set. We analyze the computation complexity of the proposed algorithm and prove the convergence of the estimators. The results of a series of experiments verify the efficiency and effectiveness of the algorithm.

Recently my mom asked me the following question: I reflected on this question and decided to write an article that explains Artificial Intelligence in simple terms. The goal is that any non-technical person can understand the high-level concepts around Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. It isn't an easy task but let's go for it! To start this explanation, we will first define some concepts and then give two real-life analogies to keep things simple. We have to define concepts first so that we are all on the same ground about what are all these concepts and buzz words.

Building operations represent a significant percentage of the total primary energy consumed in most countries due to the proliferation of Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning (HVAC) installations in response to the growing demand for improved thermal comfort. Reducing the associated energy consumption while maintaining comfortable conditions in buildings are conflicting objectives and represent a typical optimization problem that requires intelligent system design. Over the last decade, different methodologies based on the Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques have been deployed to find the sweet spot between energy use in HVAC systems and suitable indoor comfort levels to the occupants. This paper performs a comprehensive and an in-depth systematic review of AI-based techniques used for building control systems by assessing the outputs of these techniques, and their implementations in the reviewed works, as well as investigating their abilities to improve the energy-efficiency, while maintaining thermal comfort conditions. This enables a holistic view of (1) the complexities of delivering thermal comfort to users inside buildings in an energy-efficient way, and (2) the associated bibliographic material to assist researchers and experts in the field in tackling such a challenge. Among the 20 AI tools developed for both energy consumption and comfort control, functions such as identification and recognition patterns, optimization, predictive control. Based on the findings of this work, the application of AI technology in building control is a promising area of research and still an ongoing, i.e., the performance of AI-based control is not yet completely satisfactory. This is mainly due in part to the fact that these algorithms usually need a large amount of high-quality real-world data, which is lacking in the building or, more precisely, the energy sector.