Planning based on propositional SAT(isfiability) is a powerful approach to computing step-optimal plans given a parallel execution semantics. In this setting: (i) a solution plan must be minimal in the number of plan steps required, and (ii) non-conflicting actions can be executed instantaneously in parallel at a plan step. Underlying SAT-based approaches is the invocation of a decision procedure on a SAT encoding of a bounded version of the problem. A fundamental limitation of existing approaches is the size of these encodings. This problem stems from the use of a direct representation of actions — i.e. each action has a corresponding variable in the encoding. A longtime goal in planning has been to mitigate this limitation by developing a more compact split — also termed lifted — representation of actions in SAT encodings of parallel step-optimal problems. This paper describes such a representation. In particular, each action and each parallel execution of actions is represented uniquely as a conjunct of variables. Here, each variable is derived from action pre and post- conditions . Because multiple actions share conditions , our encoding of the planning constraints is factored and relatively compact. We find experimentally that our encoding yields a much more efficient and scalable planning procedure over the state-of-the-art in a large set of planning benchmarks.

N-gram analysis provides a means of probabilistically predicting the next item in a sequence. Due originally to Shannon, it has proven an effective technique for word prediction in natural language processing and for gene sequence analysis. In this paper, we investigate the utility of n-gram analysis in predicting operator sequences in plans. Given a set of sample plans, we perform n-gram analysis to predict the likelihood of subsequent operators, relative to a partial plan. We identify several ways in which this information might be integrated into a planner. In this paper, we investigate one of these directions in further detail. Preliminary results demonstrate the promise of n-gram analysis as a tool for improving planning performance.

Current heuristic estimators for classical domain-independent planning are usually based on one of four ideas: delete relaxations , critical paths , abstractions , and, most recently, landmarks . Previously, these different ideas for deriving heuristic functions were largely unconnected. We prove that admissible heuristics based on these ideas are in fact very closely related. Exploiting this relationship, we introduce a new admissible heuristic called the landmark cut heuristic , which compares favourably with the state of the art in terms of heuristic accuracy and overall performance.

Temporally expressive planning, an important class of temporal planning, has attracted much attention lately. Temporally expressive planning is difficult; few existing planners can solve them, as they have highly concurrent actions. We propose an optimal approach to temporally expressive planning based on a SAT formulation of the problem, finding solutions with the shortest time spans. Our experiments on several temporally expressive domains showed that our planner is able to optimally solve many instances in a reasonable amount of time, comparing favorably to existing temporally expressive planners. Our second result is a temporally expressive planning problem formulation of the Peer-to-Peer (P2P) network communications. In addition to demonstrating a better performance of our new method than the only existing temporally expressive planners on several temporally expressive problem domains, we apply our new planner to find optimal communication schedules for P2P networks. Our results will be potentially useful for designing efficient communication protocols in P2P networks.

Adaptive A* is an incremental version of A* that updates the h-values of the previous A* search to make them more informed and thus future A* searches more focused. In this paper, we show how the A* searches performed by Adaptive A* can reuse part of the path of the previous search and terminate before they expand a goal state, resulting in Path-Adaptive A*. We demonstrate experimentally that Path-Adaptive A* expands fewer states per search and runs faster than Adaptive A* when solving path-planning problems in initially unknown terrain.

This paper presents a generic solution to apply a mission described by a sequence of tasks on a robot while accounting for its physical constraints, without computing explicitly a reference trajectory. A naive solution to this problem would be to schedule the execution of the tasks sequentially, avoiding concurrency. This solution does not exploit fully the robot capabilities such as redundancy and have poor performance in terms of execution time or energy. Our contribution is to determine the time-optimal realization of the mission taking into account robotic constraints that may be as complex as collision avoidance. Our approach achieves more than a simple scheduling; its originality lies in maintaining the task approach in the formulated optimization of the task sequencing problem. This theory is exemplified through a complete experiment on the real HRP-2 robot.

Planning systems for real-world applications need the ability to handle concurrency and numeric fluents. Nevertheless, the predominant approach to cope with concurrency followed by the most successful participants in the latest International Planning Competitions (IPC) is still to find a sequential plan that is rescheduled in a post-processing step. We present Temporal Fast Downward (TFD), a planning system for temporal problems that is capable of finding low-makespan plans by performing a heuristic search in a temporal search space. We show how the context-enhanced additive heuristic can be successfully used for temporal planning and how it can be extended to numeric fluents. TFD often produces plans of high quality and, evaluated according to the rating scheme of the last IPC, outperforms all state-of-the-art temporal planning systems.

It has long been recognized that users can have complex preferences on plans.  Non-intrusive learning of such preferences by observing the plans executed by the user is an attractive idea. Unfortunately, the executed plans are often not a true representation of user preferences, as they result from the interaction between user preferences and feasibility constraints. In the travel planning scenario, a user whose true preference is to travel by a plane may well be frequently observed traveling by car because of feasibility constraints (perhaps the user is a poor graduate student). In this work, we describe a novel method for learning true user preferences obfuscated by such feasibility constraints.  Our base learner induces probabilistic hierarchical task networks (pHTNs) from sets of training plans. Our approach is to rescale the input so that it represents the user's preference distribution on plans rather than the observed distribution on plans.

Despite the extensive development of first-principles planning in recent years, planning applications are still primarily developed using knowledge-based planners which can exploit domain-specific heuristics and weaker domain models.  Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) planners capture domain-specific heuristics for more efficient search, accommodate incomplete causal models, and can be used to enforce standard operating procedures.  Unfortunately, we do not have semantics for the methods or tasks that make up HTN models, that help evaluate the correctness of methods, or to build a reliable executive for HTN plans.  This paper fills the gap by providing a well-defined semantics for the methods and plans of SHOP2, a state-of-the-art HTN planner.  The semantics are defined in terms of concurrent golog (ConGolog) and the situation calculus.  We provide a proof of equivalence between the plans generated by SHOP2 and the action sequences of the ConGolog semantics.  We show how the semantics reflects the distinction between plan-time and execution-time, and provide some simple examples showing how the semantics can support method verification.  The semantics provide an implementation-neutral specification for an executive, showing how an executive must treat the plans SHOP2 generates in order to enforce the expected behaviors.  Future directions include automated verification of method specifications, automatically generating plan monitors, and plan revision and repair.

The problem of formulating knowledge bases containing action schema is a central concern in knowledge engineering for AI Planning. This paper describes LOCM, a system which carries out the automated induction of action schema from sets of example plans.  Each plan is assumed to be a sound sequence of actions; each action in a plan is stated as a name and a list of objects that the action refers to. LOCM exploits the assumption that actions change the state of objects, and require objects to be in a certain state before they can be executed.  The novelty of LOCM is that it can induce action schema without being provided with any information about predicates or initial, goal or intermediate state descriptions for the example action sequences.  In this paper we describe the implemented LOCM algorithm, and analyse its performance by its application to the induction of domain models for several domains. To evaluate the algorithm, we used random action sequences from existing models of domains, as well as solutions to past IPC problems.