Systems subject to (continuous) physical effects and controlled by (discrete) digital equipments, are today very common. Thus, many realistic domains where planning is required are represented by hybrid systems , i.e., systems containing both discrete and continuous values, with possibly a nonlinear continuous dynamics. The PDDL+ language allows one to model these domains, however the current tools can generally handle only planning problems on (possibly hybrid) systems with linear dynamics. Therefore, universal planning applied to hybrid systems and, in general, to non-linear systems is completely out of scope for such tools. In this paper, we propose the use of explicit model checking-based techniques to solve universal planning problems on such hardly-approachable domains.

Planning based on propositional SAT(isfiability) is a powerful approach to computing step-optimal plans given a parallel execution semantics. In this setting: (i) a solution plan must be minimal in the number of plan steps required, and (ii) non-conflicting actions can be executed instantaneously in parallel at a plan step. Underlying SAT-based approaches is the invocation of a decision procedure on a SAT encoding of a bounded version of the problem. A fundamental limitation of existing approaches is the size of these encodings. This problem stems from the use of a direct representation of actions — i.e. each action has a corresponding variable in the encoding. A longtime goal in planning has been to mitigate this limitation by developing a more compact split — also termed lifted — representation of actions in SAT encodings of parallel step-optimal problems. This paper describes such a representation. In particular, each action and each parallel execution of actions is represented uniquely as a conjunct of variables. Here, each variable is derived from action pre and post- conditions . Because multiple actions share conditions , our encoding of the planning constraints is factored and relatively compact. We find experimentally that our encoding yields a much more efficient and scalable planning procedure over the state-of-the-art in a large set of planning benchmarks.

The field of automated plan generation has recently significantly advanced. However, while several powerful domainindependent PbP has two variants: PbP.s focusing on speed, and planners have been developed, no one of these PbP.q focusing on plan quality. PbP.s entered the learning clearly outperforms all the others in every known benchmark track of the sixth international planning competition (IPC6), domain. It would then be useful to have a multi-planner system and was the overall winner of this competition track (Fern, that automatically selects and combines the most efficient Khardon and Tadepalli 2008). The paper includes some experimental planner(s) for each given domain.

This paper proposes an iterative improvement approach for solving the Resource Constraint Project Scheduling Problem with Time-Windows (RCPSP/max), a well-known and challenging NP-hard scheduling problem. The algorithm is based on Iterative Flattening Search (IFS), an effective heuristic strategy for solving multi-capacity optimization scheduling problems. Given an initial solution, IFS iteratively performs two-steps: a relaxation-step , that randomly removes a subset of solution constraints and a solving-step , that incrementally recomputes a new solution. At the end, the best solution found is returned. The main contribution of this paper is the extension to RCPSP/max of the IFS optimization procedures developed for solving scheduling problems without time-windows. An experimental evaluation performed on medium-large size and web-available benchmark sets confirms the effectiveness of the proposed procedures. In particular, we have improved the average quality w.r.t. the current bests, while discovering three new optimal solutions, thus demonstrating the general efficacy of IFS.

Despite its ubiquitous presence, very little is known about the odds of winning the simple card game of Klondike Solitaire. The main goal of this paper is to investigate the use of probabilistic planning to shed light on this issue. Unfortunatley, most probabilistic planning techniques are not well suited for Klondike due to the difficulties of representing the domain in standard planning languages and the complexity of the required search. Klondike thus serves as an interesting addition to the complement of probabilistic planning domains. In this paper, we study Klondike using several sampling-based planning approaches including UCT, hindsight optimization, and sparse sampling, and establish lower bounds on their performance. We also introduce novel combinations of these approaches and evaluate them in Klondike. We provide a theoretical bound on the sample complexity of a method that naturally combines sparse sampling and UCT. Our results demonstrate that there is a policy that within tight confidence intervals wins over 35% of Klondike games. This result is the first reported lower bound of an optimal Klondike policy.

This paper presents multi-goal planning for an autonomous blasthole drill used in open pit mining operations. Given a blasthole pattern to be drilled and constraints on the vehicle's motion and orientation when drilling, we wish to compute the best order in which to drill the given pattern. Blasthole pattern drilling is an asymmetric Traveling Salesman Problem with precedence constraints specifying that some holes must be drilled before others. We wish to find the minimum cost tour according to criteria that minimize the distance travelled satisfying the precedence and vehicle motion constraints. We present an iterative method for solving the blasthole sequencing problem using the combination of a Genetic Algorithm and motion planning simulations that we use to determine the true cost of travel between any two holes.

PDDL 2.1 supports modelling of complex temporal planning domains in which solutions must exploit concurrency. Few existing temporal planners can solve problems that require concurrency and those that do typically pay a performance price to deploy reasoning machinery that is not always required. In this paper we show how to improve the performance of forward-search planners that attempt to solve the full temporal planning problem, both by narrowing the use of the concurrency machinery to situations that demand it and also by improving the power of inference to prune redundant branches of the search space for common patterns of interaction in temporal domains that do require concurrency. Results illustrate the effectiveness of our ideas in improving the efficiency of a temporal planner that can solve problems with required concurrency, both in domains that exploit this ability and in those that do not.

In this paper a planning framework based on Ant Colony Optimization techniques is presented. It is well known that finding optimal solutions to planning problems is a very hard computational problem. Stochastic methods do not guarantee either optimality or completeness, but it has been proved that in many applications they are able to find very good, often optimal, solutions. We propose several approaches based both on backward and forward search over the state space, using several heuristics and testing different pheromone models in order to solve sequential optimization planning problems.

We consider real-time planning problems in which some states are unsolvable, i.e., have no path to a goal. Such problems are difficult for real-time planning algorithms such as RTA* in which all states must be solvable. We identify a property called k-safeness, in which the consequences of a bad choice become apparent within k moves after the choice is made. When k is not too large, this makes it possible to identify unsolvable states in real time. We provide a modified version of RTA* that is provably complete on all k -safe problems. We derive k -safeness conditions for real-time deterministic versions of the well-known Tireworld and Racetrack domains, and provide experimental results showing that our modified version of RTA* works quite well in these domains.

N-gram analysis provides a means of probabilistically predicting the next item in a sequence. Due originally to Shannon, it has proven an effective technique for word prediction in natural language processing and for gene sequence analysis. In this paper, we investigate the utility of n-gram analysis in predicting operator sequences in plans. Given a set of sample plans, we perform n-gram analysis to predict the likelihood of subsequent operators, relative to a partial plan. We identify several ways in which this information might be integrated into a planner. In this paper, we investigate one of these directions in further detail. Preliminary results demonstrate the promise of n-gram analysis as a tool for improving planning performance.