Goal utility dependencies arise when the utility of achieving a goal depends on the other goals that are achieved with it. This complicates the planning procedure because achieving a new goal can potentially alter the utilities of all the other goals currently achieved. In this paper, we present an encoding procedure that enables general-purpose Max-SAT solvers to be used to solve planning problems with goal utility dependencies. We compare this approach to one using integer programming via an empirical evaluation using benchmark problems from past international planning competitions. Our results indicate that this approach is competitive and sometimes more successful than an integer programming one -- solving two to three times more subproblems in some domains, while being outperformed by only a significantly smaller margin in others.

Compared to optimal planners, satisficing planners can solve much harder problems but may produce overly costly and long plans. Plan quality for satisficing planners has become increasingly important. The most recent planning competition IPC-2008 used the cost of the best known plan divided by the cost of the generated plan as an evaluation metric. This paper proposes and evaluates two simple but effective methods for plan improvement: Action Elimination improves an existing plan by repeatedly removing sets of irrelevant actions. Plan Neighborhood Graph Search finds a new, shorter plan by creating a plan neighborhood graph PNG(π) of a given plan π, and then extracts a shortest path from PNG(π). Both methods are implemented in the Aras postprocessor and are empirically shown to improve the result of several planners, including the top four planners from IPC-2008, under competition conditions.

We present a planning domain that encodes the problem of generating natural language sentences. This domain has a number of features that provoke fairly unusual behavior in planners. In particular, hitherto no existing automated planner was sufficiently effective to be of practical value in this application. We analyze in detail the reasons for ineffectiveness in FF, resulting in a few minor implementation fixes in FF's preprocessor, and in a basic reconfiguration of its search options. The performance of the modified FF is up to several orders of magnitude better than that of the original FF, and for the first time makes automated planners a practical possibility for this application. Beside thus highlighting the importance of preprocessing and automated configuration techniques, we show that the domain still poses several interesting challenges to the development of search heuristics.

Anytime search algorithms solve optimisation problems by quickly finding a (usually suboptimal) first solution and then finding improved solutions when given additional time. To deliver an initial solution quickly, they are typically greedy with respect to the heuristic cost-to-go estimate h. In this paper, we show that this low-h bias can cause poor performance if the greedy search makes early mistakes. Building on this observation, we present a new anytime approach that restarts the search from the initial state every time a new solution is found. We demonstrate the utility of our method via experiments in PDDL planning as well as other domains, and show that it is particularly useful for problems where the heuristic has systematic errors.

On the basis of an analysis of previous research, we present a generalized approach for measuring the difference of plans with an exemplary application to machine scheduling. Our work is motivated by the need for such measures, which are used in dynamic scheduling and planning situations. In this context, quantitative approaches are needed for the assessment of the robustness and stability of schedules. Obviously, any `robustness' or `stability' of plans has to be defined w. r. t. the particular situation and the requirements of the human decision maker. Besides the proposition of an instability measure, we therefore discuss possibilities of obtaining meaningful information from the decision maker for the implementation of the introduced approach.

This paper presents an approach to integrating planning and execution in time-sensitive environments. We present a simple setting in which to consider the issue, that we call continual on-line planning. New goals arrive stochastically during execution, the agent issues actions for execution one at a time, and the environment is otherwise deterministic. We take the objective to be a form of time-dependent partial satisfaction planning reminiscent of discounted MDPs: goals offer reward that decays over time, actions incur fixed costs, and the agent attempts to maximize net utility. We argue that this setting highlights the central challenge of time-aware planning while excluding the complexity of non-deterministic actions. Our approach to this problem is based on real-time heuristic search. We view the two central issues as the decision of which partial plans to elaborate during search and the decision of when to issue an action for execution. We propose an extension of Russell and Wefald's decision-theoretic A* algorithm that can cope with our inadmissible heuristic. Our algorithm, DTOCS, handles the complexities of the on-line setting by balancing deliberative planning and real-time response.

Community health worker programs provide healthcare to those living outside the financial and physical reach of the standard health infrastructure. These programs are particularly prevalent in low resource regions. Frequently such programs involve community health workers making household visits across a significant geographical area. We suggest that this problem can be posed as a formal routing and scheduling problem, and to use techniques developed from solving the travelling salesman problem with time windows. In addition, household visits can generate a series of future follow up visits, a feature not often handled in the combinatorial scheduling and routing literature. We present the basic problem and outline potential research directions.

We study the problem of allocating stocks to dark pools. We propose and analyze an optimal approach for allocations, if continuous-valued allocations are allowed. We also propose a modification for the case when only integer-valued allocations are possible. We extend the previous work on this problem to adversarial scenarios, while also improving on their results in the iid setup. The resulting algorithms are efficient, and perform well in simulations under stochastic and adversarial inputs.

When creating algorithms or systems that are supposed to be used by people, we should be able to adopt a “binocular” view of users’ interaction with intelligent systems: a view that regards the design of interaction and the design of intelligent algorithms as interrelated parts of a single design problem. This special issue offers a coherent set of articles on two levels of generality that illustrate the binocular view and help readers to adopt it.

This case study article describes the iterative design process of an adaptive, mixed-initiative calendaring tool with embedded artificial intelligence.  We establish the specific types of assistance in which the target user population expressed interest, and we highlight our findings regarding the scheduling practices and the reminding preferences of these users.  These findings motivated the redesign and enhancement of our intelligent system.  Lessons learned from the study—namely, highlighting the merits of usability toward widespread adoption and retention, and that simple problems that perhaps do not necessitate complex AI-based solutions should not go unattended merely due to their inherent simplicity—conclude the article, along with a discussion of the importance of the iterative design process for any user adaptive system.