Reinforcement Learning (RL) problem with general utility is a powerful decision making framework that covers standard RL with cumulative cost, exploration problems, and demonstration learning. Existing works on RL with general utility do not consider the robustness under environmental perturbation, which is important to adapt RL system in the real-world environment that differs from the training environment. To train a robust policy, we propose a robust RL framework with general utility, which subsumes many existing RL frameworks including RL, robust RL, RL with general utility, constrained RL, robust constrained RL, pure exploration, robust entropy regularized RL, etc. Then we focus on popular convex utility functions, with which our proposed learning framework is a challenging nonconvex-nonconcave minimax optimization problem, and design a two-phase stochastic policy gradient type algorithm and obtain its sample complexity result for gradient convergence. Furthermore, for convex utility on a widely used polyhedral ambiguity set, we design an algorithm and obtain its convergence rate to a global optimal solution.

Offline optimization has recently emerged as an increasingly popular approach to mitigate the prohibitively expensive cost of online experimentation. The key idea is to learn a surrogate of the black-box function that underlines the target experiment using a static (offline) dataset of its previous input-output queries. Such an approach is, however, fraught with an out-of-distribution issue where the learned surrogate becomes inaccurate outside the offline data regimes. To mitigate this, existing offline optimizers have proposed numerous conditioning techniques to prevent the learned surrogate from being too erratic. Nonetheless, such conditioning strategies are often specific to particular surrogate or search models, which might not generalize to a different model choice.

Diffusion regulates numerous natural processes and the dynamics of many successful generative models. Existing models to learn the diffusion terms from observational data rely on complex bilevel optimization problems and model only the drift of the system.We propose a new simple model, JKOnet, which bypasses the complexity of existing architectures while presenting significantly enhanced representational capabilities: JKOnet recovers the potential, interaction, and internal energy components of the underlying diffusion process. JKOnet* minimizes a simple quadratic loss and outperforms other baselines in terms of sample efficiency, computational complexity, and accuracy. Additionally, JKOnet* provides a closed-form optimal solution for linearly parametrized functionals, and, when applied to predict the evolution of cellular processes from real-world data, it achieves state-of-the-art accuracy at a fraction of the computational cost of all existing methods.Our methodology is based on the interpretation of diffusion processes as energy-minimizing trajectories in the probability space via the so-called JKO scheme, which we study via its first-order optimality conditions.

Single-stage neural combinatorial optimization solvers have achieved near-optimal results on various small-scale combinatorial optimization (CO) problems without requiring expert knowledge. However, these solvers exhibit significant performance degradation when applied to large-scale CO problems. Recently, two-stage neural methods motivated by divide-and-conquer strategies have shown efficiency in addressing large-scale CO problems. Nevertheless, the performance of these methods highly relies on problem-specific heuristics in either the dividing or the conquering procedure, which limits their applicability to general CO problems. Moreover, these methods employ separate training schemes and ignore the interdependencies between the dividing and conquering strategies, often leading to sub-optimal solutions. To tackle these drawbacks, this article develops a unified neural divide-and-conquer framework (i.e., UDC) for solving general large-scale CO problems.

Laplace learning algorithms for graph-based semi-supervised learning have been shown to produce degenerate predictions at low label rates and in imbalanced class regimes, particularly near class boundaries. We propose CutSSL: a framework for graph-based semi-supervised learning based on continuous nonconvex quadratic programming, which provably obtains \emph{integer} solutions. Our framework is naturally motivated by an \emph{exact} quadratic relaxation of a cardinality-constrained minimum-cut graph partitioning problem. Furthermore, we show our formulation is related to an optimization problem whose approximate solution is the mean-shifted Laplace learning heuristic, thus providing new insight into the performance of this heuristic. We demonstrate that CutSSL significantly surpasses the current state-of-the-art on k-nearest neighbor graphs and large real-world graph benchmarks across a variety of label rates, class imbalance, and label imbalance regimes.

We study a typical optimization model where the optimization variable is composed of multiple probability distributions. Though the model appears frequently in practice, such as for policy problems, it lacks specific analysis in the general setting. For this optimization problem, we propose a new structural condition/landscape description named generalized quasar-convexity (GQC) beyond the realms of convexity. In contrast to original quasar-convexity \citep{hinder2020near}, GQC allows an individual quasar-convex parameter \gamma_i for each variable block i and the smaller of \gamma_i implies less block-convexity. To minimize the objective function, we consider a generalized oracle termed as the internal function that includes the standard gradient oracle as a special case.

Multiobjective optimization (MOO) plays a critical role in various real-world domains. A major challenge therein is generating K uniform Pareto-optimal solutions to represent the entire Pareto front. To address this issue, this paper firstly introduces \emph{fill distance} to evaluate the K design points, which provides a quantitative metric for the representativeness of the design. However, directly specifying the optimal design that minimizes the fill distance is nearly intractable due to the nested \min-\max-\min optimization problem. To address this, we propose a surrogate max-packing'' design for the fill distance design, which is easier to optimize and leads to a rate-optimal design with a fill distance at most 4\times the minimum value.

Multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) are prevalent in machine learning, with applications in multi-task learning, learning under fairness or robustness constraints, etc. Instead of reducing multiple objective functions into a scalar objective, MOPs aim to optimize for the so-called Pareto optimality or Pareto set learning, which involves optimizing more than one objective function simultaneously, over models with thousands to millions of parameters. Existing benchmark libraries for MOPs mainly focus on evolutionary algorithms, most of which are zeroth-order or meta-heuristic methods that do not effectively utilize higher-order information from objectives and cannot scale to large-scale models with millions of parameters. In light of the above challenges, this paper introduces \algoname, the first multiobjective optimization library that supports state-of-the-art gradient-based methods, provides a fair and comprehensive benchmark, and is open-sourced for the community.

In this paper the authors consider the problem of minimizing a continuous submodular function subject to ordering (isotonic) constraints. They first show that the problem can be solved if we first discretize it (per coordinate, not in [0,1] n), and then solve the resulting discrete optimization problem using convex optimization. The fact that the problem is solvable in polynomial time is of course not surprising, because, as pointed out by the authors in lines 29-36, we can add a penalty to the objective that will implicitly enforce the constraints. However, this can significantly increase the Lipschitz constant of the objective, and that is why the authors take on an alternative approach. First, they prove that seen in the space of measures, the isotonic constraints correspond to dominating inequalities of the CDFs, which I guess is an intuitive result given the results known for the unconstrained case.

Algorithmic fairness in clustering aims to balance the proportions of instances assigned to each cluster with respect to a given sensitive attribute. While recently developed fair clustering algorithms optimize clustering objectives under specific fairness constraints, their inherent complexity or approximation often results in suboptimal clustering utility or numerical instability in practice. To resolve these limitations, we propose a new fair clustering algorithm based on a novel decomposition of the fair $K$-means clustering objective function. The proposed algorithm, called Fair Clustering via Alignment (FCA), operates by alternately (i) finding a joint probability distribution to align the data from different protected groups, and (ii) optimizing cluster centers in the aligned space. A key advantage of FCA is that it theoretically guarantees approximately optimal clustering utility for any given fairness level without complex constraints, thereby enabling high-utility fair clustering in practice. Experiments show that FCA outperforms existing methods by (i) attaining a superior trade-off between fairness level and clustering utility, and (ii) achieving near-perfect fairness without numerical instability.