Optimization
A Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning Based Optimization Framework for Large-scale Dynamic Pickup and Delivery Problems Yi Ma
To address this problem, existing methods partition the overall DPDP into fixed-size sub-problems by caching online generated orders and solve each sub-problem, or on this basis to utilize the predicted future orders to optimize each sub-problem further. However, the solution quality and efficiency of these methods are unsatisfactory, especially when the problem scale is very large.
Supplementary Material: Fair Sparse Regression with Clustering: An Invex Relaxation for a Combinatorial Problem A Proof of Lemma 1 Lemma 1 F orpw, Zq PC, the functions f pw, Zq " x M1
We need to prove the following two inequalities. Thus, the inequality ( 19) holds trivially. Note that f p w, Z q " x M In this section, we will show that the MIQP presented in ( 4) is at least as hard to solve as a 0 1 Quadratic Program. It should be noted that MIQP ( 4) is stated for a fixed X. The Mixed Integer Quadratic Program (MIQP) ( 4) is NP-hard. " 0. Other cases will be at least as difficult as this case.
Fair Sparse Regression with Clustering: An Invex Relaxation for a Combinatorial Problem
In this paper, we study the problem of fair sparse regression on a biased dataset where bias depends upon a hidden binary attribute. The presence of a hidden attribute adds an extra layer of complexity to the problem by combining sparse regression and clustering with unknown binary labels. The corresponding optimization problem is combinatorial, but we propose a novel relaxation of it as an invex optimization problem. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first invex relaxation for a combinatorial problem. We show that the inclusion of the debi-asing/fairness constraint in our model has no adverse effect on the performance. Rather, it enables the recovery of the hidden attribute.