Recent advances in machine learning (ML) have shown promise in aiding and accelerating classical combinatorial optimization algorithms. ML-based speed ups that aim to learn in an end to end manner (i.e., directly output the solution) tend to trade off run time with solution quality. Therefore, solutions that are able to accelerate existing solvers while maintaining their performance guarantees, are of great interest. We consider an APX-hard problem, where an adversary aims to attack shortest paths in a graph by removing the minimum number of edges. We propose the GRASP algorithm: Graph Attention Accelerated Shortest Path Attack, an ML aided optimization algorithm that achieves run times up to 10x faster, while maintaining the quality of solution generated. GRASP uses a graph attention network to identify a smaller subgraph containing the combinatorial solution, thus effectively reducing the input problem size. Additionally, we demonstrate how careful representation of the input graph, including node features that correlate well with the optimization task, can highlight important structure in the optimization solution.

There has been significant recent progress in the area of unsupervised skill discovery, utilizing various information-theoretic objectives as measures of diversity. Despite these advances, challenges remain: current methods require significant online interaction, fail to leverage vast amounts of available task-agnostic data and typically lack a quantitative measure of skill utility. We address these challenges by proposing a principled offline algorithm for unsupervised skill discovery that, in addition to maximizing diversity, ensures that each learned skill imitates state-only expert demonstrations to a certain degree. Our main analytical contribution is to connect Fenchel duality, reinforcement learning, and unsupervised skill discovery to maximize a mutual information objective subject to KL-divergence state occupancy constraints. Furthermore, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on the standard offline benchmark D4RL and on a custom offline dataset collected from a 12-DoF quadruped robot for which the policies trained in simulation transfer well to the real robotic system.

Optimizing multiple competing objectives is a common problem across science and industry. The inherent inextricable trade-off between those objectives leads one to the task of exploring their Pareto front. A meaningful quantity for the purpose of the latter is the hypervolume indicator, which is used in Bayesian Optimization (BO) and Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs). However, the computational complexity for the calculation of the hypervolume scales unfavorably with an increasing number of objectives and data points, which restricts its use in those common multiobjective optimization frameworks. To overcome these restrictions, previous work has focused on approximating the hypervolume using deep learning. In this work, we propose a novel deep learning architecture to approximate the hypervolume function, which we call DeepHV. For better sample efficiency and generalization, we exploit the fact that the hypervolume is scale equivariant in each of the objectives as well as permutation invariant w.r.t. We show through an ablation study that including these symmetries leads to significantly improved model accuracy. We evaluate our method against exact, and approximate hypervolume methods in terms of accuracy, computation time, and generalization. We also apply and compare our methods to state-of-theart multi-objective BO methods and EAs on a range of synthetic and real-world benchmark test cases. The results show that our methods are promising for such multi-objective optimization tasks. Imagine, while listening to a lecture you also quickly want to check out the latest news on your phone, so you can appear informed during lunch. As an experienced listener, who knows what lecture material is important, and an excellent reader, who knows how to scan over the headlines, you are confident in your abilities in each of those tasks.

Constrained submodular maximization is a fundamental problem at the heart of discrete optimization. The reason for this is as simple as it is clear: submodular functions capture the notion of diminishing returns present in a wide variety of real-world settings. Consequently to its striking importance and coinciding NP-hardness [20], extensive research has been conducted on submodular maximization since the seventies (e.g., [15, 42]), with focus lately shifting towards handling the massive datasets emerging in modern applications. With a wide variety of possible constraints, often regarding cardinality, independence in a matroid, or knapsacktype restrictions, the number of applications is vast. To name just a few, there are recent works on feature selection in machine learning [13, 14, 32], influence maximization in viral marketing [2, 31], and data summarization [43, 38, 45]. Many of these applications have non-monotone submodular objectives, meaning that adding an element to an existing set might actually decrease its value. Two such examples are discussed in detail in Section 5. This work was supported by the ERC Advanced Grant 788893 AMDROMA "Algorithmic and Mechanism Design Research in Online Markets" and the MIUR PRIN project ALGADIMAR "Algorithms, Games, and Digital Markets."

Active learning [Settles, 2009] is a practical machine learning paradigm motivated by the expensiveness of label annotation costs and the wide availability of unlabeled data. Consider the binary classification setting, where given an instance spaceX and a binary label spaceY = { 1,+1} and a data distributionD overX Y, we would like to learn a classifier that accurately predicts the labels of examples drawn from D. As the performance measure of a classifier h, we define its error rate to be err(h):= P

We consider Bayesian optimization using Gaussian Process models, also referred to as kernel-based bandit optimization. We study the methodology of exploring the domain using random samples drawn from a distribution. We show that this random exploration approach achieves the optimal error rates. Our analysis is based on novel concentration bounds in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space established in this work, which may be of independent interest. We further develop an algorithm based on random exploration with domain shrinking and establish its order-optimal regret guarantees under both noise-free and noisy settings. In the noise-free setting, our analysis closes the existing gap in regret performance and thereby resolves a COLT open problem. The proposed algorithm also enjoys a computational advantage over prevailing methods due to the random exploration that obviates the expensive optimization of a non-convex acquisition function for choosing the query points at each iteration.

Despite the empirical success and practical significance of (relational) knowledge distillation that matches (the relations of) features between teacher and student models, the corresponding theoretical interpretations remain limited for various knowledge distillation paradigms. In this work, we take an initial step toward a theoretical understanding of relational knowledge distillation (RKD), with a focus on semi-supervised classification problems. We start by casting RKD as spectral clustering on a population-induced graph unveiled by a teacher model. Via a notion of clustering error that quantifies the discrepancy between the predicted and ground truth clusterings, we illustrate that RKD over the population provably leads to low clustering error. Moreover, we provide a sample complexity bound for RKD with limited unlabeled samples. For semi-supervised learning, we further demonstrate the label efficiency of RKD through a general framework of cluster-aware semi-supervised learning that assumes low clustering errors. Finally, by unifying data augmentation consistency regularization into this cluster-aware framework, we show that despite the common effect of learning accurate clusterings, RKD facilitates a "global" perspective through spectral clustering, whereas consistency regularization focuses on a "local" perspective via expansion.

Gradient-based first-order convex optimization algorithms find widespread applicability in a variety of domains, including machine learning tasks. Motivated by the recent advances in fixed-time stability theory of continuous-time dynamical systems, we introduce a generalized framework for designing accelerated optimization algorithms with strongest convergence guarantees that further extend to a subclass of non-convex functions. In particular, we introduce the GenFlow algorithm and its momentum variant that provably converge to the optimal solution of objective functions satisfying the Polyak-{\L}ojasiewicz (PL) inequality in a fixed time. Moreover, for functions that admit non-degenerate saddle-points, we show that for the proposed GenFlow algorithm, the time required to evade these saddle-points is uniformly bounded for all initial conditions. Finally, for strongly convex-strongly concave minimax problems whose optimal solution is a saddle point, a similar scheme is shown to arrive at the optimal solution again in a fixed time. The superior convergence properties of our algorithm are validated experimentally on a variety of benchmark datasets.

In this work, we introduce a new acquisition function for sequential sampling to efficiently quantify rare-event statistics of an input-to-response (ItR) system with given input probability and expensive function evaluations. Our acquisition is a generalization of the likelihood-weighted (LW) acquisition that was initially designed for the same purpose and then extended to many other applications. The improvement in our acquisition comes from the generalized form with two additional parameters, by varying which one can target and address two weaknesses of the original LW acquisition: (1) that the input space associated with rare-event responses is not sufficiently stressed in sampling; (2) that the surrogate model (generated from samples) may have significant deviation from the true ItR function, especially for cases with complex ItR function and limited number of samples. In addition, we develop a critical procedure in Monte-Carlo discrete optimization of the acquisition function, which achieves orders of magnitude acceleration compared to existing approaches for such type of problems. The superior performance of our new acquisition to the original LW acquisition is demonstrated in a number of test cases, including some cases that were designed to show the effectiveness of the original LW acquisition. We finally apply our method to an engineering example to quantify the rare-event roll-motion statistics of a ship in a random sea.

Graphs are mathematical tools that can be used to represent complex real-world interconnected systems, such as financial markets and social networks. Hence, machine learning (ML) over graphs has attracted significant attention recently. However, it has been demonstrated that ML over graphs amplifies the already existing bias towards certain under-represented groups in various decision-making problems due to the information aggregation over biased graph structures. Faced with this challenge, here we take a fresh look at the problem of bias mitigation in graph-based learning by borrowing insights from graph signal processing. Our idea is to introduce predesigned graph filters within an ML pipeline to reduce a novel unsupervised bias measure, namely the correlation between sensitive attributes and the underlying graph connectivity. We show that the optimal design of said filters can be cast as a convex problem in the graph spectral domain. We also formulate a linear programming (LP) problem informed by a theoretical bias analysis, which attains a closed-form solution and leads to a more efficient fairness-aware graph filter. Finally, for a design whose degrees of freedom are independent of the input graph size, we minimize the bias metric over the family of polynomial graph convolutional filters. Our optimal filter designs offer complementary strengths to explore favorable fairness-utility-complexity tradeoffs. For performance evaluation, we conduct extensive and reproducible node classification experiments over real-world networks. Our results show that the proposed framework leads to better fairness measures together with similar utility compared to state-of-the-art fairness-aware baselines.