Considering a graph with unknown weights, can we find the shortest path for a pair of nodes if we know the minimal Steiner trees associated with some subset of nodes? That is, with respect to a fixed latent decision-making system (e.g., a weighted graph), we seek to solve one optimization problem (e.g., the shortest path problem) by leveraging information associated with another optimization problem (e.g., the minimal Steiner tree problem). In this paper, we study such a prototype problem called \textit{query-decision regression with task shifts}, focusing on the shortest path problem and the minimum Steiner tree problem. We provide theoretical insights regarding the design of realizable hypothesis spaces for building scoring models, and present two principled learning frameworks. Our experimental studies show that such problems can be solved to a decent extent with statistical significance.

Finding the best solution is the most common objective in combinatorial optimization (CO) problems. However, a single solution may not be suitable in practical scenarios, as the objective functions and constraints are only approximations of original real-world situations. To tackle this, finding (i) "heterogeneous solutions", diverse solutions with distinct characteristics, and (ii) "penalty-diversified solutions", variations in constraint severity, are natural directions. This strategy provides the flexibility to select a suitable solution during post-processing. However, discovering these diverse solutions is more challenging than identifying a single solution. To overcome this challenge, this study introduces Continual Tensor Relaxation Annealing (CTRA) for unsupervised-learning-based CO solvers. CTRA addresses various problems simultaneously by extending the continual relaxation approach, which transforms discrete decision variables into continual tensors. This method finds heterogeneous and penalty-diversified solutions through mutual interactions, where the choice of one solution affects the other choices. Numerical experiments show that CTRA enables UL-based solvers to find heterogeneous and penalty-diversified solutions much faster than existing UL-based solvers. Moreover, these experiments reveal that CTRA enhances the exploration ability.

We leverage multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) to improve the performance of multi-step look-ahead Bayesian optimization (BO) methods that involve nested expectations and maximizations. The complexity rate of naive Monte Carlo degrades for nested operations, whereas MLMC is capable of achieving the canonical Monte Carlo convergence rate for this type of problem, independently of dimension and without any smoothness assumptions. Our theoretical study focuses on the approximation improvements for one- and two-step look-ahead acquisition functions, but, as we discuss, the approach is generalizable in various ways, including beyond the context of BO. Findings are verified numerically and the benefits of MLMC for BO are illustrated on several benchmark examples. Code is available here https://github.com/Shangda-Yang/MLMCBO.

Cloud computing has high applicability as an Internet based service that relies on sharing computing resources. Cloud computing provides services that are Infrastructure based, Platform based and Software based. The popularity of this technology is due to its superb performance, high level of computing ability, low cost of services, scalability, availability and flexibility. The obtainability and openness of data in cloud environment make it vulnerable to the world of cyber-attacks. To detect the attacks Intrusion Detection System is used, that can identify the attacks and ensure information security. Such a coherent and proficient Intrusion Detection System is proposed in this paper to achieve higher certainty levels regarding safety in cloud environment. In this paper, the mating behavior of peafowl is incorporated into an optimization algorithm which in turn is used as a feature selection algorithm. The algorithm is used to reduce the huge size of cloud data so that the IDS can work efficiently on the cloud to detect intrusions. The proposed model has been experimented with NSL-KDD dataset as well as Kyoto dataset and have proved to be a better as well as an efficient IDS.

The competition focuses on Multiparty Multiobjective Optimization Problems (MPMOPs), where multiple decision makers have conflicting objectives, as seen in applications like UAV path planning. Despite their importance, MPMOPs remain understudied in comparison to conventional multiobjective optimization. The competition aims to address this gap by encouraging researchers to explore tailored modeling approaches. The test suite comprises two parts: problems with common Pareto optimal solutions and Biparty Multiobjective UAV Path Planning (BPMO-UAVPP) problems with unknown solutions. Optimization algorithms for the first part are evaluated using Multiparty Inverted Generational Distance (MPIGD), and the second part is evaluated using Multiparty Hypervolume (MPHV) metrics. The average algorithm ranking across all problems serves as a performance benchmark.

Current methods for large language model alignment typically use scalar human preference labels. However, this convention tends to oversimplify the multi-dimensional and heterogeneous nature of human preferences, leading to reduced expressivity and even misalignment. This paper presents Panacea, an innovative approach that reframes alignment as a multi-dimensional preference optimization problem. Panacea trains a single model capable of adapting online and Pareto-optimally to diverse sets of preferences without the need for further tuning. A major challenge here is using a low-dimensional preference vector to guide the model's behavior, despite it being governed by an overwhelmingly large number of parameters. To address this, Panacea is designed to use singular value decomposition (SVD)-based low-rank adaptation, which allows the preference vector to be simply injected online as singular values. Theoretically, we prove that Panacea recovers the entire Pareto front with common loss aggregation methods under mild conditions. Moreover, our experiments demonstrate, for the first time, the feasibility of aligning a single LLM to represent a spectrum of human preferences through various optimization methods. Our work marks a step forward in effectively and efficiently aligning models to diverse and intricate human preferences in a controllable and Pareto-optimal manner.

Zeroth-order (ZO) optimization has become a popular technique for solving machine learning (ML) problems when first-order (FO) information is difficult or impossible to obtain. However, the scalability of ZO optimization remains an open problem: Its use has primarily been limited to relatively small-scale ML problems, such as sample-wise adversarial attack generation. To our best knowledge, no prior work has demonstrated the effectiveness of ZO optimization in training deep neural networks (DNNs) without a significant decrease in performance. To overcome this roadblock, we develop DeepZero, a principled ZO deep learning (DL) framework that can scale ZO optimization to DNN training from scratch through three primary innovations. First, we demonstrate the advantages of coordinatewise gradient estimation (CGE) over randomized vector-wise gradient estimation in training accuracy and computational efficiency. Second, we propose a sparsityinduced ZO training protocol that extends the model pruning methodology using only finite differences to explore and exploit the sparse DL prior in CGE. Third, we develop the methods of feature reuse and forward parallelization to advance the practical implementations of ZO training. Our extensive experiments show that DeepZero achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) accuracy on ResNet-20 trained on CIFAR-10, approaching FO training performance for the first time. Furthermore, we show the practical utility of DeepZero in applications of certified adversarial defense and DL-based partial differential equation error correction, achieving 10-20% improvement over SOTA. We believe our results will inspire future research on scalable ZO optimization and contribute to advancing DL with black box. Codes are available at https://github.com/OPTML-Group/DeepZero.

Optimizing a set of functions simultaneously by leveraging their similarity is called multi-task optimization. Current black-box multi-task algorithms only solve a finite set of tasks, even when the tasks originate from a continuous space. In this paper, we introduce Parametric-task MAP-Elites (PT-ME), a novel black-box algorithm to solve continuous multi-task optimization problems. This algorithm (1) solves a new task at each iteration, effectively covering the continuous space, and (2) exploits a new variation operator based on local linear regression. The resulting dataset of solutions makes it possible to create a function that maps any task parameter to its optimal solution. We show on two parametric-task toy problems and a more realistic and challenging robotic problem in simulation that PT-ME outperforms all baselines, including the deep reinforcement learning algorithm PPO.

Counterfactual reasoning is pivotal in human cognition and especially important for providing explanations and making decisions. While Judea Pearl's influential approach is theoretically elegant, its generation of a counterfactual scenario often requires interventions that are too detached from the real scenarios to be feasible. In response, we propose a framework of natural counterfactuals and a method for generating counterfactuals that are natural with respect to the actual world's data distribution. Our methodology refines counterfactual reasoning, allowing changes in causally preceding variables to minimize deviations from realistic scenarios. To generate natural counterfactuals, we introduce an innovative optimization framework that permits but controls the extent of backtracking with a naturalness criterion. Empirical experiments indicate the effectiveness of our method.

Multi-task learning (MTL) considers learning a joint model for multiple tasks by optimizing a convex combination of all task losses. To solve the optimization problem, existing methods use an adaptive weight updating scheme, where task weights are dynamically adjusted based on their respective losses to prioritize difficult tasks. However, these algorithms face a great challenge whenever label noise is present, in which case excessive weights tend to be assigned to noisy tasks that have relatively large Bayes optimal errors, thereby overshadowing other tasks and causing performance to drop across the board. To overcome this limitation, we propose Multi-Task Learning with Excess Risks (ExcessMTL), an excess risk-based task balancing method that updates the task weights by their distances to convergence instead. Intuitively, ExcessMTL assigns higher weights to worse-trained tasks that are further from convergence. To estimate the excess risks, we develop an efficient and accurate method with Taylor approximation. Theoretically, we show that our proposed algorithm achieves convergence guarantees and Pareto stationarity. Empirically, we evaluate our algorithm on various MTL benchmarks and demonstrate its superior performance over existing methods in the presence of label noise.