The Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problem lies at the core of many applications in combinatorial optimization, software verification, cryptography, and machine learning. While state-of-the-art solvers have demonstrated high efficiency in handling conjunctive normal form (CNF) formulas, numerous applications require non-CNF (hybrid) constraints, such as XOR, cardinality, and Not-All-Equal constraints. Recent work leverages polynomial representations to represent such hybrid constraints, but it relies on box constraints that can limit the use of powerful unconstrained optimizers. In this paper, we propose unconstrained continuous optimization formulations for hybrid SAT solving by penalty terms. We provide theoretical insights into when these penalty terms are necessary and demonstrate empirically that unconstrained optimizers (e.g., Adam) can enhance SAT solving on hybrid benchmarks. Our results highlight the potential of combining continuous optimization and machine-learning-based methods for effective hybrid SAT solving.

Many large enterprises that operate highly governed and complex ICT environments have no efficient and effective way to support their Data and AI teams in rapidly spinning up and tearing down self-service data and compute infrastructure, to experiment with new data analytic tools, and deploy data products into operational use. This paper proposes a key piece of the solution to the overall problem, in the form of an on-demand self-service data-platform infrastructure to empower de-centralised data teams to build data products on top of centralised templates, policies and governance. The core innovation is an efficient method to leverage immutable container operating systems and infrastructure-as-code methodologies for creating, from scratch, vendor-neutral and short-lived Kubernetes clusters on-premises and in any cloud environment. Our proposed approach can serve as a repeatable, portable and cost-efficient alternative or complement to commercial Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) offerings, and this is particularly important in supporting interoperability in complex data mesh environments with a mix of modern and legacy compute infrastructure.

Table I presents the quantitative evaluation of ProofNet++ across three distinct datasets. The FPSR (Final Proof Success Rate) metric shows that the system performs best on the mathlib-extract dataset with a 74.9% success rate, followed by miniF2F at 68.4%, and the HOL Light Testbed trailing at 63.5%. Similarly, the PPC (Proof Production Correctness) values align with this trend, indicating higher intermediate proof accuracy on mathlib-extract (88.0%) compared to the other datasets. The EDPT (Edit Distance to Proof Target) metric reveals that mathlib-extract proofs require fewer correction steps (2.4) than miniF2F (3.2) and HOL Light (4.0), suggesting that the system is more efficient in approximating correct proofs in that domain. Latency measurements reflect verifier runtime, with mathlib-extract exhibiting the fastest average verification time (176 ms), whereas HOL Light has the highest latency (214 ms). Lastly, the average proof length varies notably, with HOL Light proofs being the longest (14.3 steps), potentially contributing to its higher latency and lower success metrics. These results indicate that while ProofNet++ demonstrates strong performance on established libraries like mathlib-extract, there is room for improvement on datasets with more complex or longer proofs, such as HOL Light. Enhancements could focus on optimizing proof search strategies and reducing verifier latency, particularly for longer proofs, to improve overall efficiency and success rates. E. Benchmark Pipeline Overview Figure 1 illustrates the full evaluation pipeline used to benchmark ProofNet++, from the initial input prompt to the final corrected proof output.

What is a mathematical proof? It can be described as a sequence of logical steps and calculations that serve as evidence of the correctness of a statement. The steps must follow rules that are accepted as correct by the community. One might think there is a set of universal rules. However, this is far from being the case.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) strives to deliver reliable services that customers can trust completely. This requires maintaining the highest standards of security, durability, integrity, and availability--with systems correctness serving as the cornerstone for achieving these priorities. An April 2015 article published in Communications of the ACM, titled "How Amazon Web Services Uses Formal Methods," highlighted the approach for ensuring the correctness of critical services that have since become among the most widely used by AWS customers.21 Central to this approach was TLA,14 a formal specification language developed by Leslie Lamport. Our experience at AWS with TLA revealed two significant advantages of applying formal methods in practice.

Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) is a pivotal task in legal AI. Existing semantic-enhanced LJP models integrate judicial precedents and legal knowledge for high performance. But they neglect legal reasoning logic, a critical component of legal judgments requiring rigorous logical analysis. Although some approaches utilize legal reasoning logic for high-quality predictions, their logic rigidity hinders adaptation to case-specific logical frameworks, particularly in complex cases that are lengthy and detailed. This paper proposes a rule-enhanced legal judgment prediction framework based on first-order logic (FOL) formalism and comparative learning (CL) to develop an adaptive adjustment mechanism for legal judgment logic and further enhance performance in LJP. Inspired by the process of human exam preparation, our method follows a three-stage approach: first, we initialize judgment rules using the FOL formalism to capture complex reasoning logic accurately; next, we propose a Confusion-aware Contrastive Learning (CACL) to dynamically optimize the judgment rules through a quiz consisting of confusable cases; finally, we utilize the optimized judgment rules to predict legal judgments. Experimental results on two public datasets show superior performance across all metrics. The code is publicly available{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/RLJP-FDF1}.

Circuits based on sum-product structure have become a ubiquitous representation to compactly encode knowledge, from Boolean functions to probability distributions. By imposing constraints on the structure of such circuits, certain inference queries become tractable, such as model counting and most probable configuration. Recent works have explored analyzing probabilistic and causal inference queriesas compositions of basic operators to derive tractability conditions. In this paper, we take an algebraic perspective for compositional inference, and show that a large class of queries--including marginal MAP, probabilistic answer set programming inference, and causal backdoor adjustment--correspond to a combination of basic operators over semirings: aggregation, product, and elementwise mapping. Using this framework, we uncover simple and general sufficient conditions for tractable composition of these operators, in terms of circuit properties (e.g., marginal determinism, compatibility) and conditions on the elementwise mappings.

In pioneering work from 2019, Barceló and coauthors identified logics that precisely match the expressive power of constant iteration-depth graph neural networks (GNNs) relative to properties definable in first-order logic. In this article, we give exact logical characterizations of recurrent GNNs in two scenarios: (1) in the setting with floating-point numbers and (2) with reals. For floats, the formalism matching recurrent GNNs is a rule-based modal logic with counting, while for reals we use a suitable infinitary modal logic, also with counting. These results give exact matches between logics and GNNs in the recurrent setting without relativising to a background logic in either case, but using some natural assumptions about floating-point arithmetic. Applying our characterizations, we also prove that, relative to graph properties definable in monadic second-order logic (MSO), our infinitary and rule-based logics are equally expressive.

Formal language theory has recently been successfully employed to unravel the power of transformer encoders. This setting is primarily applicable in Natural Language Processing (NLP), as a token embedding function (where a bounded number of tokens is admitted) is first applied before feeding the input to the transformer. In this paper, we initiate the study of the expressive power of transformer encoders on sequences of data (i.e. Our results indicate an increase in expressive power of hard attention transformers over data sequences, in stark contrast to the case of strings. In particular, we prove that Unique Hard Attention Transformers (UHAT) over inputs as data sequences no longer lie within the circuit complexity class AC0 (even without positional encodings), unlike the case of string inputs, but are still within the complexity class TC0 (even with positional encodings).

Recent advances in automated theorem proving leverages language models to explore expanded search spaces by step-by-step proof generation. However, such approaches are usually based on short-sighted heuristics (e.g., log probability or value function scores) that potentially lead to suboptimal or even distracting subgoals, preventing us from finding longer proofs. To address this challenge, we propose POETRY (PrOvE Theorems RecursivelY), which proves theorems in a recursive, level-by-level manner in the Isabelle theorem prover. Unlike previous step-by-step methods, POETRY searches for a verifiable sketch of the proof at each level and focuses on solving the current level's theorem or conjecture. Detailed proofs of intermediate conjectures within the sketch are temporarily replaced by a placeholder tactic called sorry, deferring their proofs to subsequent levels.