We develop Stratified Shortest Solution Imitation Learning (3SIL) to learn equational theorem proving in a deep reinforcement learning (RL) setting. The self-trained models achieve state-of-the-art performance in proving problems generated by one of the top open conjectures in quasigroup theory, the Abelian Inner Mapping (AIM) Conjecture. To develop the methods, we first use two simpler arithmetic rewriting tasks that share tree-structured proof states and sparse rewards with the AIM problems. On these tasks, 3SIL is shown to significantly outperform several established RL and imitation learning methods. The final system is then evaluated in a standalone and cooperative mode on the AIM problems. The standalone 3SIL-trained system proves in 60 seconds more theorems (70.2%) than the complex, hand-engineered Waldmeister system (65.5%). In the cooperative mode, the final system is combined with the Prover9 system, proving in 2 seconds what standalone Prover9 proves in 60 seconds.

Vampire has been for a long time the strongest first-order automated theorem prover, widely used for hammer-style proof automation in ITPs such as Mizar, Isabelle, HOL and Coq. In this work, we considerably improve the performance of Vampire in hammering over the full Mizar library by enhancing its saturation procedure with efficient neural guidance. In particular, we employ a recursive neural network classifying the generated clauses based only on their derivation history. Compared to previous neural methods based on considering the logical content of the clauses, this leads to large real-time speedup of the neural guidance. The resulting system shows good learning capability and achieves state-of-the-art performance on the Mizar library, while proving many theorems that the related ENIGMA system could not prove in a similar hammering evaluation.

Egalitarian considerations play a central role in many areas of social choice theory. Applications of egalitarian principles range from ensuring everyone gets an equal share of a cake when deciding how to divide it, to guaranteeing balance with respect to gender or ethnicity in committee elections. Yet, the egalitarian approach has received little attention in judgment aggregation -- a powerful framework for aggregating logically interconnected issues. We make the first steps towards filling that gap. We introduce axioms capturing two classical interpretations of egalitarianism in judgment aggregation and situate these within the context of existing axioms in the pertinent framework of belief merging. We then explore the relationship between these axioms and several notions of strategyproofness from social choice theory at large. Finally, a novel egalitarian judgment aggregation rule stems from our analysis; we present complexity results concerning both outcome determination and strategic manipulation for that rule.

The chase is a well-established family of algorithms used to materialize Knowledge Bases (KBs), like Knowledge Graphs (KGs), to tackle important tasks like query answering under dependencies or data cleaning. A general problem of chase algorithms is that they might perform redundant computations. To counter this problem, we introduce the notion of Trigger Graphs (TGs), which guide the execution of the rules avoiding redundant computations. We present the results of an extensive theoretical and empirical study that seeks to answer when and how TGs can be computed and what are the benefits of TGs when applied over real-world KBs. Our results include introducing algorithms that compute (minimal) TGs. We implemented our approach in a new engine, and our experiments show that it can be significantly more efficient than the chase enabling us to materialize KBs with 17B facts in less than 40 min on commodity machines.

Program synthesis is an active research field in academia, national labs, and industry. Yet, work directly applicable to scientific computing, while having some impressive successes, has been limited. This report reviews the relevant areas of program synthesis work for scientific computing, discusses successes to date, and outlines opportunities for future work. This report is the result of the Workshop on Program Synthesis for Scientific Computing was held virtually on August 4-5 2020 (https://prog-synth-science.github.io/2020/).

To increase automation in proof assistants and other verification tools based on higher-order formalisms, we propose to generalize superposition to an extensional, polymorphic, clausal version of higher-order logic (also called simple type theory). Our ambition is to achieve a graceful extension, which coincides with standard superposition on first-order problems and smoothly scales up to arbitrary higher-order problems. Bentkamp, Blanchette, Cruanes, and Waldmann [12] designed a family of superpositionlike calculi for a λ-free clausal fragment of higher-order logic, with currying and applied variables. We adapt their extensional nonpurifying calculus to support λ-terms (Sect.

Sequences and time-series often arise in robot tasks, e.g., in activity recognition and imitation learning. In recent years, deep neural networks (DNNs) have emerged as an effective data-driven methodology for processing sequences given sufficient training data and compute resources. However, when data is limited, simpler models such as logic/rule-based methods work surprisingly well, especially when relevant prior knowledge is applied in their construction. However, unlike DNNs, these "structured" models can be difficult to extend, and do not work well with raw unstructured data. In this work, we seek to learn flexible DNNs, yet leverage prior temporal knowledge when available. Our approach is to embed symbolic knowledge expressed as linear temporal logic (LTL) and use these embeddings to guide the training of deep models. Specifically, we construct semantic-based embeddings of automata generated from LTL formula via a Graph Neural Network. Experiments show that these learnt embeddings can lead to improvements in downstream robot tasks such as sequential action recognition and imitation learning.

In this paper, we deal with a calculus system SLCD (Syllogistic Logic with Carroll Diagrams), which gives a formal approach to logical reasoning with diagrams, for representations of the fundamental Aristotelian categorical propositions and show that they are closed under the syllogistic criterion of inference which is the deletion of middle term. Therefore, it is implemented to let the formalism comprise synchronically bilateral and trilateral diagrammatical appearance and a naive algorithmic nature. And also, there is no need specific knowledge or exclusive ability to understand as well as to use it. Consequently, we give an effective algorithm used to determine whether a syllogistic reasoning valid or not by using SLCD.

The paper analyzes the parameterized complexity of evaluating Ontology Mediated Queries (OMQs) based on Guarded TGDs (GTGDs) and Unions of Conjunctive Queries (UCQs), in the setting where relational symbols might have unbounded arity and where the parameter is the size of the OMQ. It establishes exact criteria for fixed-parameter tractability (fpt) evaluation of recursively enumerable classes of such OMQs (under the widely held Exponential Time Hypothesis). One of the main technical tools introduced in the paper is an fpt-reduction from deciding parameterized uniform CSPs to parameterized OMQ evaluation. A fundamental feature of the reduction is preservation of measures which are known to be essential for classifying classes of parameterized uniform CSPs: submodular width (according to the well known result of Marx for unbounded-arity schemas) and treewidth (according to the well known result of Grohe for bounded-arity schemas). As such, the reduction can be employed to obtain hardness results for evaluation of classes of parameterized OMQs both in the unbounded and in the bounded arity case. Previously, in the case of bounded arity schemas, this has been tackled using a technique requiring full introspection into the construction employed by Grohe.

Understanding the meaning of a text is a fundamental challenge of natural language understanding (NLU) research. An ideal NLU system should process a language in a way that is not exclusive to a single task or a dataset. Keeping this in mind, we have introduced a novel knowledge driven semantic representation approach for English text. By leveraging the VerbNet lexicon, we are able to map syntax tree of the text to its commonsense meaning represented using basic knowledge primitives. The general purpose knowledge represented from our approach can be used to build any reasoning based NLU system that can also provide justification. We applied this approach to construct two NLU applications that we present here: SQuARE (Semantic-based Question Answering and Reasoning Engine) and StaCACK (Stateful Conversational Agent using Commonsense Knowledge). Both these systems work by "truly understanding" the natural language text they process and both provide natural language explanations for their responses while maintaining high accuracy.