Neoclassical economics identifies preferences with choice s. That Alice prefers x to y means only that Alice chooses x when presented with the binary-choice problem "would you li ke x or y?" As a consequence of this view, and given the great availabi lity of choice data from various sources, economists have developed and used an extensi ve methodology for analyzing choice data. Choice data are used in estimating preferences, in predicting agents' behavior out of sample, and in conducting counterfactual analysis. Ther e is, however, a growing acceptance in the profession that preferences could be meaningful beyo nd their interpretation as choices. Many economists now think that non-choice data have a role to play in the estimation of preferences and the prediction of agents' behavior. Now, while t here is substantial interest in the use of non-choice data, there is not yet a mature statistical methodological body of work designed for working with economic non-choice data. Our paper presents progress towards such a methodology . W e develop empirical methodology to estimate preferences f rom choice and response-time data.

We develop information theory for the temporal behavior of memoryful agents moving through complex -- structured, stochastic -- environments. We introduce and explore information processes -- stochastic processes produced by cognitive agents in real-time as they interact with and interpret incoming stimuli. We provide basic results on the ergodicity and semantics of the resulting time series of Shannon information measures that monitor an agent's adapting view of uncertainty and structural correlation in its environment.

The main objective of this paper is to introduce a transfer learning-enhanced deep reinforcement learning (DRL) methodology that is able to optimise the geometry of any airfoil based on concomitant aerodynamic and structural integrity criteria. To showcase the method, we aim to maximise the lift-to-drag ratio $C_L/C_D$ while preserving the structural integrity of the airfoil -- as modelled by its maximum thickness -- and train the DRL agent using a list of different transfer learning (TL) strategies. The performance of the DRL agent is compared with Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO), a traditional gradient-free optimisation method. Results indicate that DRL agents are able to perform purely aerodynamic and hybrid aerodynamic/structural shape optimisation, that the DRL approach outperforms PSO in terms of computational efficiency and aerodynamic improvement, and that the TL-enhanced DRL agent achieves performance comparable to the DRL one, while further saving substantial computational resources.

The increasing demand for automation and flexibility drives the widespread adoption of heterogeneous automated guided vehicles (AGVs). This work intends to investigate a new scheduling problem in a material transportation system consisting of attachable heterogeneous AGVs, namely carriers and shuttles. They can flexibly attach to and detach from each other to cooperatively execute complex transportation tasks. While such collaboration enhances operational efficiency, the attachment-induced synchronization and interdependence render the scheduling coupled and susceptible to deadlock. To tackle this challenge, Petri nets are introduced to model AGV schedules, well describing the concurrent and sequential task execution and carrier-shuttle synchronization. Based on Petri net theory, a firing-driven decoding method is proposed, along with deadlock detection and prevention strategies to ensure deadlock-free schedules. Furthermore, a Petri net-based metaheuristic is developed in an adaptive large neighborhood search framework and incorporates an effective acceleration method to enhance computational efficiency. Finally, numerical experiments using real-world industrial data validate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm against the scheduling policy applied in engineering practice, an exact solver, and four state-of-the-art metaheuristics. A sensitivity analysis is also conducted to provide managerial insights.

--Modern cyber attacks unfold through multiple stages, requiring defenders to dynamically prioritize mitigations under uncertainty. While game-theoretic models capture attacker-defender interactions, existing approaches often rely on static assumptions and lack integration with real-time threat intelligence, limiting their adaptability. This paper presents Cy-GATE, a game-theoretic framework modeling attacker-defender interactions, using large language models (LLMs) with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to enhance tactic selection and patch prioritization. Applied to a two-agent scenario, CyGATE frames cyber conflicts as a partially observable stochastic game (POSG) across Cyber Kill Chain stages. Both agents use belief states to navigate uncertainty, with the attacker adapting tactics and the defender re-prioritizing patches based on evolving risks and observed adversary behavior . The framework's flexible architecture enables extension to multi-agent scenarios involving coordinated attackers, collaborative defenders, or complex enterprise environments with multiple stakeholders. The evolving cybersecurity landscape presents increasingly sophisticated threats that necessitate adaptive, proactive defense strategies. Patch management, a cornerstone of cyber defense, requires intelligent prioritization of vulnerabilities under resource constraints such as maintenance windows and operational cost [1] [2] . However, traditional scoring systems like common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) [3] fail to capture the evolving nature of cyber threats, where attackers adapt their strategies based on defender actions. Game theory provides a structured framework for modeling attacker-defender interactions [4], with chained or multistage games particularly suited to representing complex attack progressions along the Cyber Kill Chain (CKC) [5][6][7]. These models allow defenders to reason about long-term risks and preempt cascading compromises. Despite these advancements, existing models remain constrained by fixed strategies, static payoff structures, and minimal integration of threat intelligence, failing to dynamically prioritize vulnerabilities based on evolving exploitation trends [8]. Traditional game-theoretical approaches typically use predefined rules to analyze strategies, hence are limited in dynamic cyber environments where adversaries continuously adapt, operate under uncertainty, and employ unpredictable tactics [9].

With the development of multimodal reasoning models, Computer Use Agents (CUAs), akin to Jarvis from \textit{"Iron Man"}, are becoming a reality. GUI grounding is a core component for CUAs to execute actual actions, similar to mechanical control in robotics, and it directly leads to the success or failure of the system. It determines actions such as clicking and typing, as well as related parameters like the coordinates for clicks. Current end-to-end grounding models still achieve less than 65\% accuracy on challenging benchmarks like ScreenSpot-pro and UI-Vision, indicating they are far from being ready for deployment. % , as a single misclick can result in unacceptable consequences. In this work, we conduct an empirical study on the training of grounding models, examining details from data collection to model training. Ultimately, we developed the \textbf{Phi-Ground} model family, which achieves state-of-the-art performance across all five grounding benchmarks for models under $10B$ parameters in agent settings. In the end-to-end model setting, our model still achieves SOTA results with scores of \textit{\textbf{43.2}} on ScreenSpot-pro and \textit{\textbf{27.2}} on UI-Vision. We believe that the various details discussed in this paper, along with our successes and failures, not only clarify the construction of grounding models but also benefit other perception tasks. Project homepage: \href{https://zhangmiaosen2000.github.io/Phi-Ground/}{https://zhangmiaosen2000.github.io/Phi-Ground/}

We provide a comprehensive examination of agent-based approaches that codify the principles and linkages underlying multi-agent systems, simulations, and information systems. Based on two decades of study, this paper confirms a framework intended as a formal specification for geosimulation platforms. Our findings show that large language models (LLMs) can be effectively incorporated as agent components if they follow a structured architecture specific to fundamental agent activities such as perception, memory, planning, and action. This integration is precisely consistent with the architecture that we formalize, providing a solid platform for next-generation geosimulation systems.

Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) methods allow for learning scalable multi-agent policies, but suffer from partial observability and induced non-stationarity. These challenges can be addressed by introducing mechanisms that facilitate coordination and high-level planning. Specifically, coordination and temporal abstraction can be achieved through communication (e.g., message passing) and Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning (HRL) approaches to decision-making. However, optimization issues limit the applicability of hierarchical policies to multi-agent systems. As such, the combination of these approaches has not been fully explored. To fill this void, we propose a novel and effective methodology for learning multi-agent hierarchies of message-passing policies. We adopt the feudal HRL framework and rely on a hierarchical graph structure for planning and coordination among agents. Agents at lower levels in the hierarchy receive goals from the upper levels and exchange messages with neighboring agents at the same level. To learn hierarchical multi-agent policies, we design a novel reward-assignment method based on training the lower-level policies to maximize the advantage function associated with the upper levels. Results on relevant benchmarks show that our method performs favorably compared to the state of the art.

This paper presents the design, implementation, and evaluation behind a Large Language Model (LLM) agent that chats with an industrial production-grade ERP system. The agent is capable of interpreting natural language queries and translating them into executable SQL statements, leveraging open-weight LLMs. A novel dual-agent architecture combining reasoning and critique stages was proposed to improve query generation reliability. Keywords: LLMs, Text to SQL, AI Agents 1. Introduction Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are complex software platforms that integrate and manage core business processes across departments such as manufacturing, logistics, finance, and human resources. These systems are essential for coordinating operations, ensuring data consistency, and enabling data-driven decision-making in industrial environments.

Scientific research increasingly depends on complex computational analysis, yet the design and execution of such analysis remain labor-intensive, error-prone, and difficult to scale. From genomics [23, 103, 125], materials discovery [25], drug development [49, 106], and epidemiology [69, 9], to climate modeling [60] and personalized medicine [36], the analytical backbone of modern science involves highly structured, multi-step workflows written in code. These workflows must integrate raw or semi-structured data, apply statistical or mechanistic models, and yield interpretable results--all under the constraints of evolving domain knowledge, platform variation, and methodological rigor. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led to rapid progress in general-purpose agents capable of decomposing tasks [118, 113, 79, 18], interacting with tools [86, 138, 147, 49], and producing executable code [30, 126, 167, 114, 140]. These developments have raised the prospect that LLM-based agents might soon contribute meaningfully to scientific discovery by automating analysis pipelines, exploring hypotheses, or refining computational models [8, 60]. However, realizing this promise requires bridging a fundamental gap between general reasoning ability and the structured, precision-driven nature of scientific computation. While many LLM-based agents have shown competence in retrieving documents, calling APIs, or planning abstract tasks [165, 154, 46, 124], these capabilities fall short in domains where scientific progress depends on code. In fields such as transcriptomics [90, 69, 9], protein engineering [106], and statistical genetics [36, 76], research workflows are encoded as sequences of programmatic transformations, each tailored to the idiosyncrasies of a specific dataset, model assumption, or experimental design.