Reinforcement learning algorithms, just like any other Machine learning algorithm pose a serious threat from adversaries. The adversaries can manipulate the learning algorithm resulting in non-optimal policies. In this paper, we analyze the Multi-task Federated Reinforcement Learning algorithms, where multiple collaborative agents in various environments are trying to maximize the sum of discounted return, in the presence of adversarial agents. We argue that the common attack methods are not guaranteed to carry out a successful attack on Multi-task Federated Reinforcement Learning and propose an adaptive attack method with better attack performance. Furthermore, we modify the conventional federated reinforcement learning algorithm to address the issue of adversaries that works equally well with and without the adversaries. Experimentation on different small to mid-size reinforcement learning problems show that the proposed attack method outperforms other general attack methods and the proposed modification to federated reinforcement learning algorithm was able to achieve near-optimal policies in the presence of adversarial agents.

We propose a simple, general and effective technique, Reward Randomization for discovering diverse strategic policies in complex multi-agent games. Combining reward randomization and policy gradient, we derive a new algorithm, Reward-Randomized Policy Gradient (RPG). RPG is able to discover multiple distinctive human-interpretable strategies in challenging temporal trust dilemmas, including grid-world games and a real-world game Agar.io, Furthermore, with the set of diverse strategies from RPG, we can (1) achieve higher payoffs by fine-tuning the best policy from the set; and (2) obtain an adaptive agent by using this set of strategies as its training opponents. Games have been a long-standing benchmark for artificial intelligence, which prompts persistent technical advances towards our ultimate goal of building intelligent agents like humans, from Shannon's initial interest in Chess (Shannon, 1950) and IBM DeepBlue (Campbell et al., 2002), to the most recent deep reinforcement learning breakthroughs in Go (Silver et al., 2017), Dota II (OpenAI et al., 2019) and Starcraft (Vinyals et al., 2019). Hence, analyzing and understanding the challenges in various games also become critical for developing new learning algorithms for even harder challenges. Most recent successes in games are based on decentralized multi-agent learning (Brown, 1951; Singh et al., 2000; Lowe et al., 2017; Silver et al., 2018), where agents compete against each other and optimize their own rewards to gradually improve their strategies. Despite the empirical success of these algorithms, a fundamental question remains largely unstudied in the field: even if an MARL algorithm converges to an NE, which equilibrium will it converge to? The existence of multiple NEs is extremely common in many multi-agent games. Discovering as many NE strategies as possible is particularly important in practice not only because different NEs can produce drastically different payoffs but also because when facing unknown players who are trained to play an NE strategy, we can gain advantage by identifying which NE strategy the opponent is playing and choosing the most appropriate response. Unfortunately, in many games where multiple distinct NEs exist, the popular decentralized policy gradient algorithm (PG), which has led to great successes in numerous games including Dota II and Stacraft, always converge to a particular NE with non-optimal payoffs and fail to explore more diverse modes in the strategy space. Consider an extremely simple example, a 2-by-2 matrix game Stag-Hunt (Rousseau, 1984; Skyrms, 2004), where two pure strategy NEs exist: a "risky" cooperative equilibrium with the highest payoff for both agents and a "safe" non-cooperative equilibrium with strictly lower payoffs.

Game theory is known to be a useful tool in the study of Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Multi-Agent interactions.

As machine learning systems become more powerful they also become increasingly unpredictable and opaque. Yet, finding human-understandable explanations of how they work is essential for their safe deployment. This technical report illustrates a methodology for investigating the causal mechanisms that drive the behaviour of artificial agents. Six use cases are covered, each addressing a typical question an analyst might ask about an agent. In particular, we show that each question cannot be addressed by pure observation alone, but instead requires conducting experiments with systematically chosen manipulations so as to generate the correct causal evidence.

Visual Place Recognition (VPR) is often characterized as being able to recognize the same place despite significant changes in appearance and viewpoint. VPR is a key component of Spatial Artificial Intelligence, enabling robotic platforms and intelligent augmentation platforms such as augmented reality devices to perceive and understand the physical world. In this paper, we observe that there are three "drivers" that impose requirements on spatially intelligent agents and thus VPR systems: 1) the particular agent including its sensors and computational resources, 2) the operating environment of this agent, and 3) the specific task that the artificial agent carries out. In this paper, we characterize and survey key works in the VPR area considering those drivers, including their place representation and place matching choices. We also provide a new definition of VPR based on the visual overlap -- akin to spatial view cells in the brain -- that enables us to find similarities and differences to other research areas in the robotics and computer vision fields. We identify numerous open challenges and suggest areas that require more in-depth attention in future works.

Advances in reinforcement learning (RL) have resulted in recent breakthroughs in the application of artificial intelligence (AI) across many different domains. An emerging landscape of development environments is making powerful RL techniques more accessible for a growing community of researchers. However, most existing frameworks do not directly address the problem of learning in complex operating environments, such as dense urban settings or defense-related scenarios, that incorporate distributed, heterogeneous teams of agents. To help enable AI research for this important class of applications, we introduce the AI Arena: a scalable framework with flexible abstractions for distributed multi-agent reinforcement learning. The AI Arena extends the OpenAI Gym interface to allow greater flexibility in learning control policies across multiple agents with heterogeneous learning strategies and localized views of the environment. To illustrate the utility of our framework, we present experimental results that demonstrate performance gains due to a distributed multi-agent learning approach over commonly-used RL techniques in several different learning environments.

In domains such as electric vehicle charging, smart distribution grids and autonomous warehouses, multiple agents share the same resources. When planning the use of these resources, agents need to deal with the uncertainty in these domains. Although several models and algorithms for such constrained multiagent planning problems under uncertainty have been proposed in the literature, it remains unclear when which algorithm can be applied. In this survey we conceptualize these domains and establish a generic problem class based on Markov decision processes. We identify and compare the conditions under which algorithms from the planning literature for problems in this class can be applied: whether constraints are soft or hard, whether agents are continuously connected, whether the domain is fully observable, whether a constraint is momentarily (instantaneous) or on a budget, and whether the constraint is on a single resource or on multiple. Further we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these algorithms. We conclude by identifying open problems that are directly related to the conceptualized domains, as well as in adjacent research areas.

Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) systems are widely prevalent in many engineering systems, e.g., robotic systems (Ding et al., 2020), power grids (Yu et al., 2014), traffic control (Bazzan, 2009), as well as team games (Zhao et al., 2019). Increasingly, federated (Yang et al., 2019) and distributed (Peteiro-Barral & Guijarro-Berdiñas, 2013) machine learning is gaining prominence in industrial applications, and reinforcement learning in these large-scale settings is becoming of import in the research community as well (Zhuo et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019). Recent research in the statistical learning community has focused on cooperative multi-agent decision-making algorithms with provable guarantees(Zhang et al., 2018b; Wai et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018a). However, prior work focuses on algorithms that, while are decentralized, provide guarantees on convergence (e.g., Zhang et al. (2018b)) but no finite-sample guarantees for regret, in contrast to efficient algorithms with function approximation proposed for single-agent RL (e.g., Jin et al. (2018, 2020); Yang et al. (2020)). Moreover, optimization in the decentralized multi-agent setting is also known to be non-convergent without assumptions (Tan, 1993). Developing no-regret multi-agent algorithms is therefore an important problem in RL. For the (relatively) easier problem of multi-agent multi-armed bandits, there has been significant recent interest in decentralized algorithms involving agents communicating over a network (Landgren et al., 2016a, 2018; Martínez-Rubio et al., 2019; Dubey & Pentland, 2020b), as well as in the distributed settings (Hillel et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2019). Since several application areas for distributed sequential decision-making regularly involve non-stationarity and contextual information (Polydoros & Nalpantidis, 2017), an MDP formulation can potentially provide stronger algorithms for these settings as well. Furthermore, no-regret algorithms in the single-agent RL setting with function approximation (e.g., Jin et al. (2020)) build on analysis techniques for contextual bandits, which leads us to the question - Can no-regret function approximation be extended to (decentralized) cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning?

Welcome to the fourth edition of the AI Index Report. This year we significantly expanded the amount of data available in the report, worked with a broader set of external organizations to calibrate our data, and deepened our connections with the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI). The AI Index Report tracks, collates, distills, and visualizes data related to artificial intelligence. Its mission is to provide unbiased, rigorously vetted, and globally sourced data for policymakers, researchers, executives, journalists, and the general public to develop intuitions about the complex field of AI. The report aims to be the most credible and authoritative source for data and insights about AI in the world.

Human beings are able to understand objectives and learn by simply observing others perform a task. Imitation learning methods aim to replicate such capabilities, however, they generally depend on access to a full set of optimal states and actions taken with the agent's actuators and from the agent's point of view. In this paper, we introduce a new algorithm - called Disentangling Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning (DisentanGAIL) - with the purpose of bypassing such constraints. Our algorithm enables autonomous agents to learn directly from high dimensional observations of an expert performing a task, by making use of adversarial learning with a latent representation inside the discriminator network. Such latent representation is regularized through mutual information constraints to incentivize learning only features that encode information about the completion levels of the task being demonstrated. This allows to obtain a shared feature space to successfully perform imitation while disregarding the differences between the expert's and the agent's domains. Empirically, our algorithm is able to efficiently imitate in a diverse range of control problems including balancing, manipulation and locomotive tasks, while being robust to various domain differences in terms of both environment appearance and agent embodiment.