Agents
Agent-based models of social behaviour and communication in evacuations: A systematic review
Templeton, Anne, Xie, Hui, Gwynne, Steve, Hunt, Aoife, Thompson, Pete, Köster, Gerta
Most modern agent-based evacuation models involve interactions between evacuees. However, the assumed reasons for interactions and portrayal of them may be overly simple. Research from social psychology suggests that people interact and communicate with one another when evacuating and evacuee response is impacted by the way information is communicated. Thus, we conducted a systematic review of agent-based evacuation models to identify 1) how social interactions and communication approaches between agents are simulated, and 2) what key variables related to evacuation are addressed in these models. We searched Web of Science and ScienceDirect to identify articles that simulated information exchange between agents during evacuations, and social behaviour during evacuations. From the final 70 included articles, we categorised eight types of social interaction that increased in social complexity from collision avoidance to social influence based on strength of social connections with other agents. In the 17 models which simulated communication, we categorised four ways that agents communicate information: spatially through information trails or radii around agents, via social networks and via external communication. Finally, the variables either manipulated or measured in the models were categorised into the following groups: environmental condition, personal attributes of the agents, procedure, and source of information. We discuss promising directions for agent-based evacuation models to capture the effects of communication and group dynamics on evacuee behaviour. Moreover, we demonstrate how communication and group dynamics may impact the variables commonly used in agent-based evacuation models.
Do Differences in Values Influence Disagreements in Online Discussions?
van der Meer, Michiel, Vossen, Piek, Jonker, Catholijn M., Murukannaiah, Pradeep K.
Disagreements are common in online discussions. Disagreement may foster collaboration and improve the quality of a discussion under some conditions. Although there exist methods for recognizing disagreement, a deeper understanding of factors that influence disagreement is lacking in the literature. We investigate a hypothesis that differences in personal values are indicative of disagreement in online discussions. We show how state-of-the-art models can be used for estimating values in online discussions and how the estimated values can be aggregated into value profiles. We evaluate the estimated value profiles based on human-annotated agreement labels. We find that the dissimilarity of value profiles correlates with disagreement in specific cases. We also find that including value information in agreement prediction improves performance.
Assume-Guarantee Verification of Strategic Ability
Mikulski, Łukasz, Jamroga, Wojciech, Kurpiewski, Damian
Model checking of strategic abilities is a notoriously hard problem, even more so in the realistic case of agents with imperfect information. Assume-guarantee reasoning can be of great help here, providing a way to decompose the complex problem into a small set of exponentially easier subproblems. In this paper, we propose two schemes for assume-guarantee verification of alternating-time temporal logic with imperfect information. We prove the soundness of both schemes, and discuss their completeness. We illustrate the method by examples based on known benchmarks, and show experimental results that demonstrate the practical benefits of the approach.
Emergent Communication in Interactive Sketch Question Answering
Lei, Zixing, Zhang, Yiming, Xiong, Yuxin, Chen, Siheng
Vision-based emergent communication (EC) aims to learn to communicate through sketches and demystify the evolution of human communication. Ironically, previous works neglect multi-round interaction, which is indispensable in human communication. To fill this gap, we first introduce a novel Interactive Sketch Question Answering (ISQA) task, where two collaborative players are interacting through sketches to answer a question about an image in a multi-round manner. To accomplish this task, we design a new and efficient interactive EC system, which can achieve an effective balance among three evaluation factors, including the question answering accuracy, drawing complexity and human interpretability. Our experimental results including human evaluation demonstrate that multi-round interactive mechanism facilitates targeted and efficient communication between intelligent agents with decent human interpretability. The code is available at here.
Symmetric Strategies for Multi-Access IoT Network Optimization: A Common Information Approach
In the context of IoT deployments, a multitude of devices concurrently require network access to transmit data over a shared communication channel. Employing symmetric strategies can effectively facilitate the collaborative use of the communication medium among these devices. By adopting such strategies, devices collectively optimize their transmission parameters, resulting in minimized collisions and enhanced overall network throughput. Our primary focus centers on the formulation of symmetric (i.e., identical) strategies for the sensors, aiming to optimize a finite horizon team objective. The imposition of symmetric strategies introduces novel facets and complexities into the team problem. To address this, we embrace the common information approach and adapt it to accommodate the use of symmetric strategies. This adaptation yields a dynamic programming framework grounded in common information, wherein each step entails the minimization of a single function mapping from an agent's private information space to the space of probability distributions over possible actions. Our proposed policy/method incurs a reduced cumulative cost compared to other methods employing symmetric strategies, a point substantiated by our simulation results.
Rule Enforcing Through Ordering
Sychrovský, David, Desai, Sameer, Loebl, Martin
In many real world situations, like minor traffic offenses in big cities, a central authority is tasked with periodic administering punishments to a large number of individuals. Common practice is to give each individual a chance to suffer a smaller fine and be guaranteed to avoid the legal process with probable considerably larger punishment. However, thanks to the large number of offenders and a limited capacity of the central authority, the individual risk is typically small and a rational individual will not choose to pay the fine. Here we show that if the central authority processes the offenders in a publicly known order, it properly incentives the offenders to pay the fine. We show analytically and on realistic experiments that our mechanism promotes non-cooperation and incentives individuals to pay. Moreover, the same holds for an arbitrary coalition. We quantify the expected total payment the central authority receives, and show it increases considerably.
Intent-based Deep Reinforcement Learning for Multi-agent Informative Path Planning
Yang, Tianze, Cao, Yuhong, Sartoretti, Guillaume
In multi-agent informative path planning (MAIPP), agents must collectively construct a global belief map of an underlying distribution of interest (e.g., gas concentration, light intensity, or pollution levels) over a given domain, based on measurements taken along their trajectory. They must frequently replan their path to balance the exploration of new areas with the exploitation of known high-interest areas, to maximize information gain within a predefined budget. Traditional approaches rely on reactive path planning conditioned on other agents' predicted future actions. However, as the belief is continuously updated, the predicted actions may not match the executed actions, introducing noise and reducing performance. We propose a decentralized, deep reinforcement learning (DRL) approach using an attention-based neural network, where agents optimize long-term individual and cooperative objectives by sharing their intent, represented as a distribution of medium-/long-term future positions obtained from their own policy. Intent sharing enables agents to learn to claim or avoid broader areas, while the use of attention mechanisms allows them to identify useful portions of imperfect predictions, maximizing cooperation even based on imperfect information. Our experiments compare the performance of our approach, its variants, and high-quality baselines across various MAIPP scenarios. We finally demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach under limited communication ranges, towards deployments under realistic communication constraints.
Conformal Prediction for Federated Uncertainty Quantification Under Label Shift
Plassier, Vincent, Makni, Mehdi, Rubashevskii, Aleksandr, Moulines, Eric, Panov, Maxim
Federated Learning (FL) is a machine learning framework where many clients collaboratively train models while keeping the training data decentralized. Despite recent advances in FL, the uncertainty quantification topic (UQ) remains partially addressed. Among UQ methods, conformal prediction (CP) approaches provides distribution-free guarantees under minimal assumptions. We develop a new federated conformal prediction method based on quantile regression and take into account privacy constraints. This method takes advantage of importance weighting to effectively address the label shift between agents and provides theoretical guarantees for both valid coverage of the prediction sets and differential privacy. Extensive experimental studies demonstrate that this method outperforms current competitors.
Diverse Conventions for Human-AI Collaboration
Sarkar, Bidipta, Shih, Andy, Sadigh, Dorsa
Conventions are crucial for strong performance in cooperative multi-agent games, because they allow players to coordinate on a shared strategy without explicit communication. Unfortunately, standard multi-agent reinforcement learning techniques, such as self-play, converge to conventions that are arbitrary and non-diverse, leading to poor generalization when interacting with new partners. In this work, we present a technique for generating diverse conventions by (1) maximizing their rewards during self-play, while (2) minimizing their rewards when playing with previously discovered conventions (cross-play), stimulating conventions to be semantically different. To ensure that learned policies act in good faith despite the adversarial optimization of cross-play, we introduce \emph{mixed-play}, where an initial state is randomly generated by sampling self-play and cross-play transitions and the player learns to maximize the self-play reward from this initial state. We analyze the benefits of our technique on various multi-agent collaborative games, including Overcooked, and find that our technique can adapt to the conventions of humans, surpassing human-level performance when paired with real users.