This article proposes connectionism as an alternative to classical cognitivism in understanding design. It also considers the difficulties encountered within a particular view of the role of explanations and typologies. Connectionism provides an alternative model that does not depend on the articulation of explanations and typologies.

LEARNING IN NETWORKS OF NONDETERMINISTIC ADAPTIVE LOGIC ELEMENTS Richard C. Windecker* AT&T Bell Laboratories, Middletown, NJ 07748 ABSTRACT This paper presents a model of nondeterministic adaptive automata that are constructed from simpler nondeterministic adaptive information processing elements. The first half of the paper describes the model. Chief among these properties is that network aggregates of the model elements can adapt appropriately when a single reinforcement channel provides the same positive or negative reinforcement signal to all adaptive elements of the network at the same time. This holds for multiple-input, multiple-output, multiple-layered, combinational and sequential networks. It also holds when some network elements are "hidden" in that their outputs are not directly seen by the external environment. INTRODUCTION There are two primary motivations for studying models of adaptive automata constructed from simple parts. First, they let us learn things about real biological systems whose properties are difficult to study directly: We form a hypothesis about such systems, embody it in a model, and then see if the model has reasonable learning and behavioral properties. In the present work, the hypothesis being tested is: that much of an animal's behavior as determined by its nervous system is intrinsically nondeterministic; that learning consists of incremental changes in the probabilities governing the animal's behavior; and that this is a consequence of the animal's nervous system consisting of an aggregate of information processing elements some of which are individually nondeterministic and adaptive. The second motivation for studying models of this type is to find ways of building machines that can learn to do (artificially) intelligent and practical things.

LEARNING IN NETWORKS OF NONDETERMINISTIC ADAPTIVE LOGIC ELEMENTS Richard C. Windecker* AT&T Bell Laboratories, Middletown, NJ 07748 ABSTRACT This paper presents a model of nondeterministic adaptive automata that are constructed from simpler nondeterministic adaptive information processing elements. The first half of the paper describes the model. Chief among these properties is that network aggregates of the model elements can adapt appropriately when a single reinforcement channel provides the same positive or negative reinforcement signal to all adaptive elements of the network at the same time. This holds for multiple-input, multiple-output, multiple-layered, combinational and sequential networks. It also holds when some network elements are "hidden" in that their outputs are not directly seen by the external environment. INTRODUCTION There are two primary motivations for studying models of adaptive automata constructed from simple parts. First, they let us learn things about real biological systems whose properties are difficult to study directly: We form a hypothesis about such systems, embody it in a model, and then see if the model has reasonable learning and behavioral properties. In the present work, the hypothesis being tested is: that much of an animal's behavior as determined by its nervous system is intrinsically nondeterministic; that learning consists of incremental changes in the probabilities governing the animal's behavior; and that this is a consequence of the animal's nervous system consisting of an aggregate of information processing elements some of which are individually nondeterministic and adaptive. The second motivation for studying models of this type is to find ways of building machines that can learn to do (artificially) intelligent and practical things.

The first half of the paper describes the model.

ON THE MECHANIZATION OF ABDUCTIVE LOGIC Harry E. Pople, Jr. Graduate School of Business University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260 Session 6 Logic: II Theorem Proving and Abstract Abduction Is a basic form of logical inference, which is said to engender the use of plans, perceptual models, intuitions, and analogical reasoning - all aspects of Intelligent behavior that have so far failed to find representation in existing formal deductive systems. This paper explores the abductive reasoning process and develops a model for its mechanization, .which An application of the method to the problem of medical diagnosis is discussed. Introduction There has been growing criticism lately concerning the methodology of artificial intelligence. While differing in the specifics of their analyses of the problem, most thoughtful observers seem to feel that the current stock of deductive machinery is simply not up to the task at hand.