The deployment of large language models (LLMs) raises concerns regarding their cultural misalignment and potential ramifications on individuals from various cultural norms. Existing work investigated political and social biases and public opinions rather than their cultural values. To address this limitation, the proposed Cultural Alignment Test (CAT) quantifies cultural alignment using Hofstede's cultural dimension framework, which offers an explanatory cross-cultural comparison through the latent variable analysis. We apply our approach to assess the cultural values embedded in state-of-the-art LLMs, such as: ChatGPT and Bard, across diverse cultures of countries: United States (US), Saudi Arabia, China, and Slovakia, using different prompting styles and hyperparameter settings. Our results not only quantify cultural alignment of LLMs with certain countries, but also reveal the difference between LLMs in explanatory cultural dimensions. While all LLMs did not provide satisfactory results in understanding cultural values, GPT-4 exhibited the highest CAT score for the cultural values of the US.

Motivated by the substantial achievements observed in Large Language Models (LLMs) in the field of natural language processing, recent research has commenced investigations into the application of LLMs for complex, long-horizon sequential task planning challenges in robotics. LLMs are advantageous in offering the potential to enhance the generalizability as task-agnostic planners and facilitate flexible interaction between human instructors and planning systems. However, task plans generated by LLMs often lack feasibility and correctness. To address this challenge, we introduce ISR-LLM, a novel framework that improves LLM-based planning through an iterative self-refinement process. The framework operates through three sequential steps: preprocessing, planning, and iterative self-refinement. During preprocessing, an LLM translator is employed to convert natural language input into a Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) formulation. In the planning phase, an LLM planner formulates an initial plan, which is then assessed and refined in the iterative self-refinement step by using a validator. We examine the performance of ISR-LLM across three distinct planning domains. The results show that ISR-LLM is able to achieve markedly higher success rates in task accomplishments compared to state-of-the-art LLM-based planners. Moreover, it also preserves the broad applicability and generalizability of working with natural language instructions.

During the current mental health crisis, the importance of identifying potential indicators of mental issues from social media content has surged. Overlooking the multifaceted nature of mental and social well-being can have detrimental effects on one's mental state. In traditional therapy sessions, professionals manually pinpoint the origins and outcomes of underlying mental challenges, a process both detailed and time-intensive. We introduce an approach to this intricate mental health analysis by framing the identification of wellness dimensions in Reddit content as a wellness concept extraction and categorization challenge. We've curated a unique dataset named WELLXPLAIN, comprising 3,092 entries and totaling 72,813 words. Drawing from Halbert L. Dunn's well-regarded wellness theory, our team formulated an annotation framework along with guidelines. This dataset also includes human-marked textual segments, offering clear reasoning for decisions made in the wellness concept categorization process. Our aim in publishing this dataset and analyzing initial benchmarks is to spearhead the creation of advanced language models tailored for healthcare-focused concept extraction and categorization.

A large number of studies on social media compare the behaviour of users from different political parties. As a basic step, they employ a predictive model for inferring their political affiliation. The accuracy of this model can change the conclusions of a downstream analysis significantly, yet the choice between different models seems to be made arbitrarily. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey and an empirical comparison of the current party prediction practices and propose several new approaches which are competitive with or outperform state-of-the-art methods, yet require less computational resources. Party prediction models rely on the content generated by the users (e.g., tweet texts), the relations they have (e.g., who they follow), or their activities and interactions (e.g., which tweets they like). We examine all of these and compare their signal strength for the party prediction task. This paper lets the practitioner select from a wide range of data types that all give strong performance. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments on different aspects of these methods, such as data collection speed and transfer capabilities, which can provide further insights for both applied and methodological research.

Completing a sentence, phrase or word after typing few words / characters is very helpful for Intuit financial experts, while taking notes or having a live chat with users, since they need to write complex financial concepts more efficiently and accurately many times in a day. In this paper, we tie together different approaches like large language models, traditional Markov Models and char level models to create an end-to-end system to provide personalised sentence/word auto-complete suggestions to experts, under strict latency constraints. Proposed system can auto-complete sentences, phrases or words while writing with personalisation and can be trained with very less data and resources with good efficiency. Our proposed system is not only efficient and personalized but also robust as it leverages multiple machine learning techniques along with transfer learning approach to fine tune large language model with Intuit specific data. This ensures that even in cases of rare or unusual phrases, the system can provide relevant auto-complete suggestions in near real time. Survey has showed that this system saves expert note-taking time and boosts expert confidence in their communication with teammates and clients. Since enabling this predictive writing feature for QBLive experts, more than a million keystrokes have been saved based on these suggestions. We have done comparative study for our ensemble choice. Moreover this feature can be integrated with any product which has writing facility within a very short period of time.

Open intent detection, a crucial aspect of natural language understanding, involves the identification of previously unseen intents in user-generated text. Despite the progress made in this field, challenges persist in handling new combinations of language components, which is essential for compositional generalization. In this paper, we present a case study exploring the use of ChatGPT as a data augmentation technique to enhance compositional generalization in open intent detection tasks. We begin by discussing the limitations of existing benchmarks in evaluating this problem, highlighting the need for constructing datasets for addressing compositional generalization in open intent detection tasks. By incorporating synthetic data generated by ChatGPT into the training process, we demonstrate that our approach can effectively improve model performance. Rigorous evaluation of multiple benchmarks reveals that our method outperforms existing techniques and significantly enhances open intent detection capabilities. Our findings underscore the potential of large language models like ChatGPT for data augmentation in natural language understanding tasks.

As the responsibility of software developers encompasses more than just writing code, current Large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved the ability LLMs cannot fully replace professional software developers [4, 29]. to perform tasks in the field of code generation. However, there At a high level, the gap lies in several critical aspects of software is still a gap between LLMs being capable coders and being top-tier development beyond coding, such as effective communications, software engineers. Based on the observation that top-level software requirements, design, domain knowledge, and the broader context engineers often ask clarifying questions to reduce ambiguity of relevant projects and components, etc. [23, 31, 32, 35]. In this in both requirements and coding solutions, we argue that the same paper, we are interested in applying the communication lens to should be applied to LLMs for code generation tasks. By asking inspect the gap, given that effective communication is a critical probing questions in various topics before generating the final code, capability that connects all of the above-mentioned parts to coding.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable and prevalent, and can be used to produce creative content. The quality of content is influenced by the prompt used, with more specific prompts that incorporate examples generally producing better results. On from this, it could be seen that using instructions written for crowdsourcing tasks (that are specific and include examples to guide workers) could prove effective LLM prompts. To explore this, we used a previous crowdsourcing pipeline that gave examples to people to help them generate a collectively diverse corpus of motivational messages. We then used this same pipeline to generate messages using GPT-4, and compared the collective diversity of messages from: (1) crowd-writers, (2) GPT-4 using the pipeline, and (3 & 4) two baseline GPT-4 prompts. We found that the LLM prompts using the crowdsourcing pipeline caused GPT-4 to produce more diverse messages than the two baseline prompts. We also discuss implications from messages generated by both human writers and LLMs.

From the perspective of content safety issues, alignment has shown to limit large language models' (LLMs) harmful content generation. This intentional method of reinforcing models to not respond to certain user inputs seem to be present in many modern open-source instruction tuning datasets such as OpenAssistant or Guanaco. We introduce a novel insight to an instruction-tuned model's performance affected by the presence of alignment in supervised fine-tuning dataset. To be specific, we noticed that alignment acts as if it is poisoning the instruction dataset. Experimentally, we demonstrate that aligned answers significantly worsen the performance of the resulting fine-tuned model's on various reasoning benchmarks such as Big Bench (BBH), Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU), Human Eval, and Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs (DROP), performing worse than the counterpart tuned without alignment by 4-33%.

Software development plays a crucial role in driving innovation and efficiency across modern societies. To meet the demands of this dynamic field, there is a growing need for an effective software development assistant. However, existing large language models represented by ChatGPT suffer from limited accessibility, including training data and model weights. Although other large open-source models like LLaMA have shown promise, they still struggle with understanding human intent. In this paper, we present SoTaNa, an open-source software development assistant. SoTaNa utilizes ChatGPT to generate high-quality instruction-based data for the domain of software engineering and employs a parameter-efficient fine-tuning approach to enhance the open-source foundation model, LLaMA. We evaluate the effectiveness of \our{} in answering Stack Overflow questions and demonstrate its capabilities. Additionally, we discuss its capabilities in code summarization and generation, as well as the impact of varying the volume of generated data on model performance. Notably, SoTaNa can run on a single GPU, making it accessible to a broader range of researchers. Our code, model weights, and data are public at \url{https://github.com/DeepSoftwareAnalytics/SoTaNa}.