Terminology correctness is important in the downstream application of machine translation, and a prevalent way to ensure this is to inject terminology constraints into a translation system. In our submission to the WMT 2023 terminology translation task, we adopt a translate-then-refine approach which can be domain-independent and requires minimal manual efforts. We annotate random source words with pseudo-terminology translations obtained from word alignment to first train a terminology-aware model. Further, we explore two post-processing methods. First, we use an alignment process to discover whether a terminology constraint has been violated, and if so, we re-decode with the violating word negatively constrained. Alternatively, we leverage a large language model to refine a hypothesis by providing it with terminology constraints. Results show that our terminology-aware model learns to incorporate terminologies effectively, and the large language model refinement process can further improve terminology recall.

Large language models (LLMs), like ChatGPT and GPT-4, have demonstrated remarkable abilities in natural language understanding and generation. However, alongside their positive impact on our daily tasks, they can also produce harmful content that negatively affects societal perceptions. To systematically assess the safety of Chinese LLMs, we introduce SuperCLUE-Safety (SC-Safety) - a multi-round adversarial benchmark with 4912 open-ended questions covering more than 20 safety sub-dimensions. Adversarial human-model interactions and conversations significantly increase the challenges compared to existing methods. Experiments on 13 major LLMs supporting Chinese yield the following insights: 1) Closed-source models outperform open-sourced ones in terms of safety; 2) Models released from China demonstrate comparable safety levels to LLMs like GPT-3.5-turbo; 3) Some smaller models with 6B-13B parameters can compete effectively in terms of safety. By introducing SC-Safety, we aim to promote collaborative efforts to create safer and more trustworthy LLMs. The benchmark and findings provide guidance on model selection. Our benchmark can be found at https://www.CLUEbenchmarks.com

Recent studies have indicated that foundation models, such as BERT and GPT, excel in adapting to a variety of downstream tasks. This adaptability has established them as the dominant force in building artificial intelligence (AI) systems. As visualization techniques intersect with these models, a new research paradigm emerges. This paper divides these intersections into two main areas: visualizations for foundation models (VIS4FM) and foundation models for visualizations (FM4VIS). In VIS4FM, we explore the primary role of visualizations in understanding, refining, and evaluating these intricate models. This addresses the pressing need for transparency, explainability, fairness, and robustness. Conversely, within FM4VIS, we highlight how foundation models can be utilized to advance the visualization field itself. The confluence of foundation models and visualizations holds great promise, but it also comes with its own set of challenges. By highlighting these challenges and the growing opportunities, this paper seeks to provide a starting point for continued exploration in this promising avenue.

While Large Language Models (LLMs) are the dominant models for generative tasks in language, they do not perform as well as diffusion models on image and video generation. To effectively use LLMs for visual generation, one crucial component is the visual tokenizer that maps pixel-space inputs to discrete tokens appropriate for LLM learning. In this paper, we introduce MAGVIT-v2, a video tokenizer designed to generate concise and expressive tokens for both videos and images using a common token vocabulary. Equipped with this new tokenizer, we show that LLMs outperform diffusion models on standard image and video generation benchmarks including ImageNet and Kinetics. In addition, we demonstrate that our tokenizer surpasses the previously top-performing video tokenizer on two more tasks: (1) video compression comparable to the next-generation video codec (VCC) according to human evaluations, and (2) learning effective representations for action recognition tasks.

Recent development of large language models (LLMs) for code like CodeX and CodeT5+ demonstrates tremendous promise in achieving code intelligence. Their ability of synthesizing code that completes a program for performing a pre-defined task has been intensively tested and verified on benchmark datasets including HumanEval and MBPP. Yet, evaluation of these LLMs from more perspectives (than just program synthesis) is also anticipated, considering their broad scope of applications in software engineering. In this paper, we explore the ability of LLMs for testing programs/code. By performing thorough analyses of recent LLMs for code in program testing, we show a series of intriguing properties of these models and demonstrate how program testing ability of LLMs can be improved. Following recent work which utilizes generated test cases to enhance program synthesis, we further leverage our findings in improving the quality of the synthesized programs and show +11.77% and +4.22% higher code pass rates on HumanEval+ comparing with the GPT-3.5-turbo The community has witnessed a surge in the development of large language models (LLMs), which have achieved incredible ability in understanding and generating not only texts but also code. LLMs for code (CodeX (Chen et al., 2021), StarCoder (Li et al., 2023b), CodeT5+ (Wang et al., 2023b), etc) have been widely adopted to a variety of applications to achieve code intelligence. However, current evaluation of these LLMs mostly focuses on program completion/synthesis, despite the models can also be utilized in other applications.

The utilization of large language models (LLMs) in the Healthcare domain has generated both excitement and concern due to their ability to effectively respond to freetext queries with certain professional knowledge. This survey outlines the capabilities of the currently developed LLMs for Healthcare and explicates their development process, with the aim of providing an overview of the development roadmap from traditional Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) to LLMs. Specifically, we first explore the potential of LLMs to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of various Healthcare applications highlighting both the strengths and limitations. Secondly, we conduct a comparison between the previous PLMs and the latest LLMs, as well as comparing various LLMs with each other. Then we summarize related Healthcare training data, training methods, optimization strategies, and usage. Finally, the unique concerns associated with deploying LLMs in Healthcare settings are investigated, particularly regarding fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics. Our survey provide a comprehensive investigation from perspectives of both computer science and Healthcare specialty. Besides the discussion about Healthcare concerns, we supports the computer science community by compiling a collection of open source resources, such as accessible datasets, the latest methodologies, code implementations, and evaluation benchmarks in the Github. Summarily, we contend that a significant paradigm shift is underway, transitioning from PLMs to LLMs. This shift encompasses a move from discriminative AI approaches to generative AI approaches, as well as a shift from model-centered methodologies to datacentered methodologies.

This paper proposes a method of abstractive summarization designed to scale to document collections instead of individual documents. Our approach applies a combination of semantic clustering, document size reduction within topic clusters, semantic chunking of a cluster's documents, GPT-based summarization and concatenation, and a combined sentiment and text visualization of each topic to support exploratory data analysis. Statistical comparison of our results to existing state-of-the-art systems BART, BRIO, PEGASUS, and MoCa using ROGUE summary scores showed statistically equivalent performance with BART and PEGASUS on the CNN/Daily Mail test dataset, and with BART on the Gigaword test dataset. This finding is promising since we view document collection summarization as more challenging than individual document summarization. We conclude with a discussion of how issues of scale are

In this paper, we assess the efficacy of ChatGPT (version Feb 2023), a large-scale language model, in solving probability problems typically presented in introductory computer engineering exams. Our study comprised a set of 23 probability exercises administered to students at Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC) in Madrid. The responses produced by ChatGPT were evaluated by a group of five statistics professors, who assessed them qualitatively and assigned grades based on the same criteria used for students. Our results indicate that ChatGPT surpasses the average student in terms of phrasing, organization, and logical reasoning. The model's performance remained consistent for both the Spanish and English versions of the exercises. However, ChatGPT encountered difficulties in executing basic numerical operations. Our experiments demonstrate that requesting ChatGPT to provide the solution in the form of an R script proved to be an effective approach for overcoming these limitations. In summary, our results indicate that ChatGPT surpasses the average student in solving probability problems commonly presented in introductory computer engineering exams. Nonetheless, the model exhibits limitations in reasoning around certain probability concepts. The model's ability to deliver high-quality explanations and illustrate solutions in any programming language, coupled with its performance in solving probability exercises, suggests that large language models have the potential to serve as learning assistants.

Using large language models (LLMs) to evaluate text quality has recently gained popularity. Some prior works explore the idea of using LLMs for evaluation, while they differ in some details of the evaluation process. In this paper, we analyze LLM evaluation (Chiang and Lee, 2023) and G-Eval (Liu et al., 2023), and we discuss how those details in the evaluation process change how well the ratings given by LLMs correlate with human ratings. We find that the auto Chain-of-Thought (CoT) used in G-Eval does not always make G-Eval more aligned with human ratings. We also show that forcing the LLM to output only a numeric rating, as in G-Eval, is suboptimal. Last, we reveal that asking the LLM to explain its own ratings consistently improves the correlation between the ChatGPT and human ratings and pushes state-of-the-art (SoTA) correlations on two meta-evaluation datasets.

The Counter Narrative (CN) is a promising approach to combat online hate speech (HS) without infringing on freedom of speech. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in automatically generating CNs using natural language generation techniques. However, current automatic CN generation methods mainly rely on expert-authored datasets for training, which are time-consuming and labor-intensive to acquire. Furthermore, these methods cannot directly obtain and extend counter-knowledge from external statistics, facts, or examples. To address these limitations, we propose Retrieval-Augmented Unsupervised Counter Narrative Generation (RAUCG) to automatically expand external counter-knowledge and map it into CNs in an unsupervised paradigm. Specifically, we first introduce an SSF retrieval method to retrieve counter-knowledge from the multiple perspectives of stance consistency, semantic overlap rate, and fitness for HS. Then we design an energy-based decoding mechanism by quantizing knowledge injection, countering and fluency constraints into differentiable functions, to enable the model to build mappings from counter-knowledge to CNs without expert-authored CN data. Lastly, we comprehensively evaluate model performance in terms of language quality, toxicity, persuasiveness, relevance, and success rate of countering HS, etc. Experimental results show that RAUCG outperforms strong baselines on all metrics and exhibits stronger generalization capabilities, achieving significant improvements of +2.0% in relevance and +4.5% in success rate of countering metrics. Moreover, RAUCG enabled GPT2 to outperform T0 in all metrics, despite the latter being approximately eight times larger than the former. Warning: This paper may contain offensive or upsetting content!