The research on embodied AI has greatly promoted the development of robot manipulation. However, it still faces significant challenges in various aspects such as benchmark construction, multi-modal perception and decision-making, and physical execution. Previous robot manipulation simulators were primarily designed to enrich manipulation types and types of objects while neglecting the balance between physical manipulation and language instruction complexity in multi-modal environments. This paper proposes a new robot manipulation simulator and builds a comprehensive and systematic robot manipulation benchmark with progressive reasoning tasks called SeaWave (i.e., a progressive reasoning benchmark). It provides a standard test platform for embedded AI agents in a multi-modal environment, which can evaluate and execute four levels of human natural language instructions at the same time. Previous world model-based robot manipulation work lacked research on the perception and decision-making of complex instructions in multi-modal environments. To this end, we propose a new world model tailored for cross-modal robot manipulation called DamWorld. Specifically, DamWorld takes the current visual scene and predicted execution actions based on natural language instructions as input, and uses the next action frame to supervise the output of the world model to force the model to learn robot manipulation consistent with world knowledge. Compared with the renowned baselines (e.g., RT-1), our DamWorld improves the manipulation success rate by 5.6% on average on four levels of progressive reasoning tasks. It is worth noting that on the most challenging level 4 manipulation task, DamWorld still improved by 9.0% compared to prior works.

Designing natural language interfaces has historically required collecting supervised data to translate user requests into carefully designed intent representations. This requires enumerating and labeling a long tail of user requests, which is challenging. At the same time, large language models (LLMs) encode knowledge about goals and plans that can help conversational assistants interpret user requests requiring numerous steps to complete. We introduce an approach to handle complex-intent-bearing utterances from a user via a process of hierarchical natural language decomposition and interpretation. Our approach uses a pre-trained language model to decompose a complex utterance into a sequence of simpler natural language steps and interprets each step using the language-to-program model designed for the interface. To test our approach, we collect and release DeCU -- a new NL-to-program benchmark to evaluate Decomposition of Complex Utterances. Experiments show that the proposed approach enables the interpretation of complex utterances with almost no complex training data, while outperforming standard few-shot prompting approaches.

Lately, propelled by the phenomenal advances around the transformer architecture, the legal NLP field has enjoyed spectacular growth. To measure progress, well curated and challenging benchmarks are crucial. However, most benchmarks are English only and in legal NLP specifically there is no multilingual benchmark available yet. Additionally, many benchmarks are saturated, with the best models clearly outperforming the best humans and achieving near perfect scores. We survey the legal NLP literature and select 11 datasets covering 24 languages, creating LEXTREME. To provide a fair comparison, we propose two aggregate scores, one based on the datasets and one on the languages. The best baseline (XLM-R large) achieves both a dataset aggregate score a language aggregate score of 61.3. This indicates that LEXTREME is still very challenging and leaves ample room for improvement. To make it easy for researchers and practitioners to use, we release LEXTREME on huggingface together with all the code required to evaluate models and a public Weights and Biases project with all the runs.

Artificial Intelligence is now recognized as a general-purpose technology with ample impact on human life. This work aims at understanding the evolution of AI and, in particular Machine learning, from the perspective of researchers' contributions to the field. In order to do so, we present several measures allowing the analyses of AI and machine learning researchers' impact, influence, and leadership over the last decades. This work also contributes, to a certain extent, to shed new light on the history and evolution of AI by exploring the dynamics involved in the field's evolution by looking at papers published at the flagship AI and machine learning conferences since the first International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) held in 1969. AI development and evolution have led to increasing research output, reflected in the number of articles published over the last sixty years. We construct comprehensive citation collaboration and paper-author datasets and compute corresponding centrality measures to carry out our analyses. These analyses allow a better understanding of how AI has reached its current state of affairs in research. Throughout the process, we correlate these datasets with the work of the ACM Turing Award winners and the so-called two AI winters the field has gone through. We also look at self-citation trends and new authors' behaviors. Finally, we present a novel way to infer the country of affiliation of a paper from its organization. Therefore, this work provides a deep analysis of Artificial Intelligence history from information gathered and analysed from large technical venues datasets and suggests novel insights that can contribute to understanding and measuring AI's evolution.

Large language models have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in tasks involving natural language generation, reasoning, and comprehension. This study aims to construct prompts and comments grounded in the diverse scoring criteria delineated within the official TOEFL guide. The primary objective is to assess the capabilities and constraints of ChatGPT, a prominent representative of large language models, within the context of automated essay scoring. The prevailing methodologies for automated essay scoring involve the utilization of deep neural networks, statistical machine learning techniques, and fine-tuning pre-trained models. However, these techniques face challenges when applied to different contexts or subjects, primarily due to their substantial data requirements and limited adaptability to small sample sizes. In contrast, this study employs ChatGPT to conduct an automated evaluation of English essays, even with a small sample size, employing an experimental approach. The empirical findings indicate that ChatGPT can provide operational functionality for automated essay scoring, although the results exhibit a regression effect. It is imperative to underscore that the effective design and implementation of ChatGPT prompts necessitate a profound domain expertise and technical proficiency, as these prompts are subject to specific threshold criteria. Keywords: ChatGPT, Automated Essay Scoring, Prompt Learning, TOEFL Independent Writing Task

This study aimed to examine an assumption that generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools can overcome the cognitive intensity that humans suffer when solving problems. We compared the performance of ChatGPT and GPT-4 on 2019 NAEP science assessments with students by cognitive demands of the items. Fifty-four tasks were coded by experts using a two-dimensional cognitive load framework, including task cognitive complexity and dimensionality. ChatGPT and GPT-4 responses were scored using the scoring keys of NAEP. The analysis of the available data was based on the average student ability scores for students who answered each item correctly and the percentage of students who responded to individual items. Results showed that both ChatGPT and GPT-4 consistently outperformed most students who answered the NAEP science assessments. As the cognitive demand for NAEP tasks increases, statistically higher average student ability scores are required to correctly address the questions. This pattern was observed for students in grades 4, 8, and 12, respectively. However, ChatGPT and GPT-4 were not statistically sensitive to the increase in cognitive demands of the tasks, except for Grade 4. As the first study focusing on comparing GAI and K-12 students in problem-solving in science, this finding implies the need for changes to educational objectives to prepare students with competence to work with GAI tools in the future. Education ought to emphasize the cultivation of advanced cognitive skills rather than depending solely on tasks that demand cognitive intensity. This approach would foster critical thinking, analytical skills, and the application of knowledge in novel contexts. Findings also suggest the need for innovative assessment practices by moving away from cognitive intensity tasks toward creativity and analytical skills to avoid the negative effects of GAI on testing more efficiently.

This work presents an unsupervised method for automatically constructing and expanding topic taxonomies by using instruction-based fine-tuned LLMs (Large Language Models). We apply topic modeling and keyword extraction techniques to create initial topic taxonomies and LLMs to post-process the resulting terms and create a hierarchy. To expand an existing taxonomy with new terms, we use zero-shot prompting to find out where to add new nodes, which, to our knowledge, is the first work to present such an approach to taxonomy tasks. We use the resulting taxonomies to assign tags that characterize merchants from a retail bank dataset. To evaluate our work, we asked 12 volunteers to answer a two-part form in which we first assessed the quality of the taxonomies created and then the tags assigned to merchants based on that taxonomy. The evaluation revealed a coherence rate exceeding 90% for the chosen taxonomies, while the average coherence for merchant tagging surpassed 80%.

How would research be like if we still needed to "send" papers typed with a typewriter? Our life and research environment have continually evolved, often accompanied by controversial opinions about new methodologies. In this paper, we embrace this change by introducing a new approach to qualitative analysis in HCI using Large Language Models (LLMs). We detail a method that uses LLMs for qualitative data analysis and present a quantitative framework using SBART cosine similarity for performance evaluation. Our findings indicate that LLMs not only match the efficacy of traditional analysis methods but also offer unique insights. Through a novel dataset and benchmark, we explore LLMs' characteristics in HCI research, suggesting potential avenues for further exploration and application in the field.

The commercialization of diffusion models, renowned for their ability to generate high-quality images that are often indistinguishable from real ones, brings forth potential copyright concerns. Although attempts have been made to impede unauthorized access to copyrighted material during training and to subsequently prevent DMs from generating copyrighted images, the effectiveness of these solutions remains unverified. This study explores the vulnerabilities associated with copyright protection in DMs by introducing a backdoor data poisoning attack (SilentBadDiffusion) against text-to-image diffusion models. Our attack method operates without requiring access to or control over the diffusion model's training or fine-tuning processes; it merely involves the insertion of poisoning data into the clean training dataset. This data, comprising poisoning images equipped with prompts, is generated by leveraging the powerful capabilities of multimodal large language models and text-guided image inpainting techniques. Our experimental results and analysis confirm the method's effectiveness. By integrating a minor portion of non-copyright-infringing stealthy poisoning data into the clean dataset-rendering it free from suspicion-we can prompt the finetuned diffusion models to produce copyrighted content when activated by specific trigger prompts. These findings underline potential pitfalls in the prevailing copyright protection strategies and underscore the necessity for increased scrutiny and preventative measures against the misuse of DMs.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have experienced a rapid rise in AI, changing a wide range of applications with their advanced capabilities. As these models become increasingly integral to decision-making, the need for thorough interpretability has never been more critical. Mechanistic Interpretability offers a pathway to this understanding by identifying and analyzing specific sub-networks or 'circuits' within these complex systems. A crucial aspect of this approach is Automated Circuit Discovery, which facilitates the study of large models like GPT4 or LLAMA in a feasible manner. In this context, our research evaluates a recent method, Brain-Inspired Modular Training (BIMT), designed to enhance the interpretability of neural networks. We demonstrate how BIMT significantly improves the efficiency and quality of Automated Circuit Discovery, overcoming the limitations of manual methods. Our comparative analysis further reveals that BIMT outperforms existing models in terms of circuit quality, discovery time, and sparsity. Additionally, we provide a comprehensive computational analysis of BIMT, including aspects such as training duration, memory allocation requirements, and inference speed. This study advances the larger objective of creating trustworthy and transparent AI systems in addition to demonstrating how well BIMT works to make neural networks easier to understand.