Time series forecasting is essential for many practical applications, with the adoption of transformer-based models on the rise due to their impressive performance in NLP and CV. Transformers' key feature, the attention mechanism, dynamically fusing embeddings to enhance data representation, often relegating attention weights to a byproduct role. Yet, time series data, characterized by noise and non-stationarity, poses significant forecasting challenges. Our approach elevates attention weights as the primary representation for time series, capitalizing on the temporal relationships among data points to improve forecasting accuracy. Our study shows that an attention map, structured using global landmarks and local windows, acts as a robust kernel representation for data points, withstanding noise and shifts in distribution. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art models, reducing mean squared error (MSE) in multivariate time series forecasting by a notable 3.6% without altering the core neural network architecture. It serves as a versatile component that can readily replace recent patching based embedding schemes in transformer-based models, boosting their performance.

User intentions are typically formalized as evaluation rewards to be maximized when fine-tuning language models (LMs). Existing alignment methods, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), are mainly tailored for pairwise preference data where rewards are implicitly defined rather than explicitly given. In this paper, we introduce a general framework for LM alignment, leveraging Noise Contrastive Estimation (NCE) to bridge the gap in handling reward datasets explicitly annotated with scalar evaluations. Our framework comprises two parallel algorithms, NCA and InfoNCA, both enabling the direct extraction of an LM policy from reward data as well as preference data. Notably, we show that the DPO loss is a special case of our proposed InfoNCA objective under pairwise preference settings, thereby integrating and extending current alignment theories. By contrasting NCA and InfoNCA, we show that InfoNCA and DPO adjust relative likelihood across different responses to a single instruction, while NCA optimizes absolute likelihood for each response. We apply our methods to align a 7B language model with a GPT-4 annotated reward dataset. Experimental results suggest that InfoNCA surpasses the DPO baseline in GPT-4 evaluations, while NCA enjoys better training stability with competitive performance.

Foundation models, such as Large language Models (LLMs), have attracted significant amount of interest due to their large number of applications. Existing works show that appropriate prompt design, such as Chain-of-Thoughts, can unlock LLM's powerful capacity in diverse areas. However, when handling tasks involving repetitive sub-tasks and/or deceptive contents, such as arithmetic calculation and article-level fake news detection, existing prompting strategies either suffers from insufficient expressive power or intermediate errors triggered by hallucination. To make LLM more discerning to such intermediate errors, we propose to guide LLM with a Divide-and-Conquer program that simultaneously ensures superior expressive power and disentangles task decomposition, sub-task resolution, and resolution assembly process. Theoretic analysis reveals that our strategy can guide LLM to extend the expressive power of fixed-depth Transformer. Experiments indicate that our proposed method can achieve better performance than typical prompting strategies in tasks bothered by intermediate errors and deceptive contents, such as large integer multiplication, hallucination detection and misinformation detection.

The over-parameterized pre-trained models pose a great challenge to fine-tuning with limited computation resources. An intuitive solution is to prune the less informative samples from the fine-tuning dataset. A series of training-based scoring functions are proposed to quantify the informativeness of the data subset but the pruning cost becomes non-negligible due to the heavy parameter updating. For efficient pruning, it is viable to adapt the similarity scoring function of geometric-based methods from training-based to training-free. However, we empirically show that such adaption distorts the original pruning and results in inferior performance on the downstream tasks. In this paper, we propose to treat the learning complexity (LC) as the scoring function for classification and regression tasks. Specifically, the learning complexity is defined as the average predicted confidence of subnets with different capacities, which encapsulates data processing within a converged model. Then we preserve the diverse and easy samples for fine-tuning. Extensive experiments with vision datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed scoring function for classification tasks. For the instruction fine-tuning of large language models, our method achieves state-of-the-art performance with stable convergence, outperforming the full training with only 10\% of the instruction dataset.

Information retrieval is a rapidly evolving field of information retrieval, which is characterized by a continuous refinement of techniques and technologies, from basic hyperlink-based navigation to sophisticated algorithm-driven search engines. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of Information Retrieval Technology, with a particular focus on the role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in bridging the gap between traditional search methods and the emerging paradigm of answer retrieval. The integration of LLMs in the realms of response retrieval and indexing signifies a paradigm shift in how users interact with information systems. This paradigm shift is driven by the integration of large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4, which are capable of understanding and generating human-like text, thus enabling them to provide more direct and contextually relevant answers to user queries. Through this exploration, we seek to illuminate the technological milestones that have shaped this journey and the potential future directions in this rapidly changing field.

Neurosymbolic AI combines the interpretability, parsimony, and explicit reasoning of classical symbolic approaches with the statistical learning of data-driven neural approaches. Models and policies that are simultaneously differentiable and interpretable may be key enablers of this marriage. This paper demonstrates three pathways to implementing such models and policies in a real-world reinforcement learning setting. Specifically, we study a broad class of neural networks that build interpretable semantics directly into their architecture. We reveal and highlight both the potential and the essential difficulties of combining logic, simulation, and learning. One lesson is that learning benefits from continuity and differentiability, but classical logic is discrete and non-differentiable. The relaxation to real-valued, differentiable representations presents a trade-off; the more learnable, the less interpretable. Another lesson is that using logic in the context of a numerical simulation involves a non-trivial mapping from raw (e.g., real-valued time series) simulation data to logical predicates. Some open questions this note exposes include: What are the limits of rule-based controllers, and how learnable are they? Do the differentiable interpretable approaches discussed here scale to large, complex, uncertain systems? Can we truly achieve interpretability? We highlight these and other themes across the three approaches.

In this research study, we empirically investigate the effect of sampling temperature on the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) on various problem-solving tasks. We created a multiple-choice question-and-answer (MCQA) exam by randomly sampling problems from standard LLM benchmarks. Then, we used four popular LLMs with five prompt-engineering techniques to solve the MCQA problems while increasing the sampling temperature from 0.0 to 1.0. Despite anecdotal reports to the contrary, our empirical results indicate that changes in temperature in the range 0.0 to 1.0 do not have a statistically significant impact on LLM performance for problem-solving tasks. In addition, these results appear to hold regardless of the LLM, the prompt-engineering technique, or the problem domain. All code, data, and supplemental materials are available on GitHub at: https://github.com/matthewrenze/jhu-llm-temperature.

Large Language Models (LLMs) create exciting possibilities for powerful language processing tools to accelerate research in materials science. While LLMs have great potential to accelerate materials understanding and discovery, they currently fall short in being practical materials science tools. In this position paper, we show relevant failure cases of LLMs in materials science that reveal current limitations of LLMs related to comprehending and reasoning over complex, interconnected materials science knowledge. Given those shortcomings, we outline a framework for developing Materials Science LLMs (MatSci-LLMs) that are grounded in materials science knowledge and hypothesis generation followed by hypothesis testing. The path to attaining performant MatSci-LLMs rests in large part on building high-quality, multi-modal datasets sourced from scientific literature where various information extraction challenges persist. As such, we describe key materials science information extraction challenges which need to be overcome in order to build large-scale, multi-modal datasets that capture valuable materials science knowledge. Finally, we outline a roadmap for applying future MatSci-LLMs for real-world materials discovery via: 1. Automated Knowledge Base Generation; 2. Automated In-Silico Material Design; and 3. MatSci-LLM Integrated Self-Driving Materials Laboratories.

One of the challenges in robotics is to enable robotic units with the reasoning capability that would be robust enough to execute complex tasks in dynamic environments. Recent advances in LLMs have positioned them as go-to tools for simple reasoning tasks, motivating the pioneering work of Liang et al. [35] that uses an LLM to translate natural language commands into low-level static execution plans for robotic units. Using LLMs inside robotics systems brings their generalization to a new level, enabling zero-shot generalization to new tasks. This paper extends this prior work to dynamic environments. We propose InCoRo, a system that uses a classical robotic feedback loop composed of an LLM controller, a scene understanding unit, and a robot. Our system continuously analyzes the state of the environment and provides adapted execution commands, enabling the robot to adjust to changing environmental conditions and correcting for controller errors. Our system does not require any iterative optimization to learn to accomplish a task as it leverages in-context learning with an off-the-shelf LLM model. Through an extensive validation process involving two standardized industrial robotic units -- SCARA and DELTA types -- we contribute knowledge about these robots, not popular in the community, thereby enriching it. We highlight the generalization capabilities of our system and show that (1) in-context learning in combination with the current state-of-the-art LLMs is an effective way to implement a robotic controller; (2) in static environments, InCoRo surpasses the prior art in terms of the success rate; (3) in dynamic environments, we establish new state-of-the-art for the SCARA and DELTA units, respectively. This research paves the way towards building reliable, efficient, intelligent autonomous systems that adapt to dynamic environments.

Despite these efforts, recent studies have uncovered concerning'jailbreak' scenarios. In these cases, even well-aligned Large language models (LLMs) show inherent models have had their safeguards successfully breached (Albert, brittleness in their safety mechanisms, as evidenced 2023). These jailbreaks can include crafting adversarial by their susceptibility to jailbreaking and prompts (Wei et al., 2023; Jones et al., 2023; Carlini even non-malicious fine-tuning. This study explores et al., 2023; Zou et al., 2023b; Shen et al., 2023; Zhu et al., this brittleness of safety alignment by leveraging 2023; Qi et al., 2023), applying persuasion techniques (Zeng pruning and low-rank modifications. We develop et al., 2024), or manipulating the model's decoding process methods to identify critical regions that are (Huang et al., 2024). Recent studies show that finetuning vital for safety guardrails, and that are disentangled an aligned LLM, even on a non-malicious dataset, from utility-relevant regions at both the neuron can inadvertently weaken a model's safety mechanisms (Qi and rank levels. Surprisingly, the isolated regions et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2023; Zhan et al., 2023). Often, we find are sparse, comprising about 3% at these vulnerabilities apply to both open-access and closedaccess the parameter level and 2.5% at the rank level.