In this paper, we address the challenge of enforcing strict schema adherence in large language model (LLM) generation by leveraging LLM reasoning capabilities. Building on the DeepSeek R1 reinforcement learning framework, our approach trains structured reasoning skills of a 1.5B parameter model through a novel pipeline that combines synthetic reasoning dataset construction with custom reward functions under Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). Specifically, we first perform R1 reinforcement learning on a 20K sample unstructured-to-structured dataset, mirroring the original DeepSeek R1 methods, to establish core reasoning abilities. Subsequently, we performed supervised fine-tuning on a separate 10K reasoning sample dataset, focusing on refining schema adherence for downstream tasks. Despite the relatively modest training scope, requiring approximately 20 hours on an 8xH100 GPU cluster for GRPO training and 3 hours on 1xA100 for SFT, our model demonstrates robust performance in enforcing schema consistency. We compare our ThinkJSON approach against the original DeepSeek R1 (671B), distilled versions of DeepSeek R1 (Qwen-1.5B and Qwen-7B), and Gemini 2.0 Flash (70B), showcasing its effectiveness in real-world applications. Our results underscore the practical utility of a resource-efficient framework for schema-constrained text generation.

An ongoing and intriguing debate focuses on whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can replicate human language. The literature presents mixed evidence on this matter. Several studies suggest that LLMs can generate text closely resembling human language (Bubeck et al., 2023; Clark et al., 2021; Georgiou, 2025). However, the widely accept ed concept of a universal grammar inherent in humans (Chomsky, 2000) challenges the idea that machine cognition can mirror human cognition. According to Chomsky et al. (2023), models like ChatGPT function as statistical engines driven by pattern recognitio n. Supporting this perspective, other studies highlight significant differences between human cognition and LLMs, which are reflected in language (Cai et al., 2024; Georgiou, 2024; Herbold et al., 2023). For instance, Georgiou (2024) examined how various linguistic components are represented in human - written and AI - generated texts, assessing the ability of ChatGPT to emulate human writing. The author found that d espite AI - generated texts appear ing to mimic human language, the results revealed signifi cant differences across multiple linguistic features in the domains of phonology, grammar, and semantics.

Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Voice Recognition agents are rapidly evolving healthcare by enabling efficient, accessible, and professional patient support while automating grunt work. This report serves as my self project wherein models finetuned on medical call recordings are analysed through a two-stage system: Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) for speech transcription and a Large Language Model (LLM) for context-aware, professional responses. ASR, finetuned on phone call recordings provides generalised transcription of diverse patient speech over call, while the LLM matches transcribed text to medical diagnosis. A novel audio preprocessing strategy, is deployed to provide invariance to incoming recording/call data, laden with sufficient augmentation with noise/clipping to make the pipeline robust to the type of microphone and ambient conditions the patient might have while calling/recording.

This study explores how to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in knowledge base question answering (KBQA) by leveraging Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). Semantic parsing-based KBQA methods are particularly challenging as these approaches require locating elements from knowledge bases and generating logical forms, demanding not only extensive annotated data but also strong reasoning capabilities. Although recent approaches leveraging LLMs as agents have demonstrated considerable potential, these studies are inherently constrained by their linear decision-making processes. To address this limitation, we propose a MCTS-based framework that enhances LLMs' reasoning capabilities through tree search methodology. We design a carefully designed step-wise reward mechanism that requires only direct prompting of open-source instruction LLMs without additional fine-tuning. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms linear decision-making methods, particularly in low-resource scenarios. Additionally, we contribute new data resources to the KBQA community by annotating intermediate reasoning processes for existing question-SPARQL datasets using distant supervision. Experimental results on the extended dataset demonstrate that our method achieves comparable performance to fully supervised models while using significantly less training data.

Question answering on free-form tables (TableQA) is challenging due to the absence of predefined schemas and the presence of noise in large tables. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in TableQA, they struggle with large free-form tables and noise sensitivity. To address these challenges, we propose TabSD, a SQL-based decomposition model that enhances LLMs' ability to process large free-form tables. TabSD generates SQL queries to guide the table decomposition, remove noise, and processes sub-tables for better answer generation. Additionally, SQL Verifier refines SQL outputs to enhance decomposition accuracy. We introduce two TableQA datasets with large free-form tables, SLQA and SEQA, which consist solely of large free-form tables and will be publicly available. Experimental results on four benchmark datasets demonstrate that TABSD outperforms the best-existing baseline models by 23.07%, 2.84%, 23.24% and 9.32% in accuracy, respectively, highlighting its effectiveness in handling large and noisy free-form tables.

Abstract--Large language models (LLMs) face the challenge of hallucinations - outputs that seem coherent but are actually incorrect. A particularly damaging type is fact-conflicting hallucination (FCH), where generated content contradicts established facts. Addressing FCH presents three main challenges: 1) Automatically constructing and maintaining large-scale benchmark datasets is difficult and resource-intensive; 2) Generating complex and efficient test cases that the LLM has not been trained on - especially those involving intricate temporal features - is challenging, yet crucial for eliciting hallucinations; and 3) Validating the reasoning behind LLM outputs is inherently difficult, particularly with complex logical relationships, as it requires transparency in the model's decision-making process. LLMs are tested using these cases through template-based prompts, which require them to generate both answers and reasoning steps. T o validate the reasoning, we propose two semantic-aware oracles that compare the semantic structure of LLM outputs to the ground truths. Key insights reveal that LLMs struggle with out-of-distribution knowledge and logical reasoning. These findings highlight the importance of continued efforts to detect and mitigate hallucinations in LLMs. Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized language processing, demonstrating impressive text generation and comprehension capabilities with diverse applications. However, despite their growing use, LLMs face significant security and privacy challenges [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], which affect their overall effectiveness and reliability . A critical issue is the phenomenon of hallucination, where LLMs generate outputs that are coherent but factually incorrect or irrelevant. This tendency to produce misleading information compromises the safety and usability of LLM-based systems. This paper focuses on fact-conflicting hallucina tion (FCH), the most prominent form of hallucination in LLMs. FCH occurs when LLMs generate content that directly contradicts established facts. For instance, as illustrated in Figure 1, an LLM incorrectly asserts that " Haruki Murakami won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 2016 ", whereas the fact is that "Haruki Murakami has not won the Nobel Prize, though he has received numerous other literary awards ". Such inaccuracies can significantly lead to user confusion and undermine the trust and reliability that are crucial for LLM applications. N. Li, K. Wang, and H. Wang are with Huazhong University of Science and T echnology, China. Song is with the National University of Singapore, Singapore. Li is with the University of New South Wales, Australia.

The API Knowledge Graph (API KG) is a structured network that models API entities and their relations, providing essential semantic insights for tasks such as API recommendation, code generation, and API misuse detection. However, constructing a knowledge-rich and reliable API KG presents several challenges. Existing schema-based methods rely heavily on manual annotations to design KG schemas, leading to excessive manual overhead. On the other hand, schema-free methods, due to the lack of schema guidance, are prone to introducing noise, reducing the KG's reliability. To address these issues, we propose the Explore-Construct-Filter framework, an automated approach for API KG construction based on large language models (LLMs). This framework consists of three key modules: 1) KG exploration: LLMs simulate the workflow of annotators to automatically design a schema with comprehensive type triples, minimizing human intervention; 2) KG construction: Guided by the schema, LLMs extract instance triples to construct a rich yet unreliable API KG; 3) KG filtering: Removing invalid type triples and suspicious instance triples to construct a rich and reliable API KG. Experimental results demonstrate that our method surpasses the state-of-the-art method, achieving a 25.2% improvement in F1 score. Moreover, the Explore-Construct-Filter framework proves effective, with the KG exploration module increasing KG richness by 133.6% and the KG filtering module improving reliability by 26.6%. Finally, cross-model experiments confirm the generalizability of our framework.

Despite recent advancements, most computational methods for molecule optimization are constrained to single- or double-property optimization tasks and suffer from poor scalability and generalizability to novel optimization tasks. Meanwhile, Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable out-of-domain generalizability to novel tasks. To demonstrate LLMs' potential for molecule optimization, we introduce $\mathtt{MoMUInstruct}$, the first high-quality instruction-tuning dataset specifically focused on complex multi-property molecule optimization tasks. Leveraging $\mathtt{MoMUInstruct}$, we develop $\mathtt{GeLLM^3O}$s, a series of instruction-tuned LLMs for molecule optimization. Extensive evaluations across 5 in-domain and 5 out-of-domain tasks demonstrate that $\mathtt{GeLLM^3O}$s consistently outperform state-of-the-art baselines. $\mathtt{GeLLM^3O}$s also exhibit outstanding zero-shot generalization to unseen tasks, significantly outperforming powerful closed-source LLMs. Such strong generalizability demonstrates the tremendous potential of $\mathtt{GeLLM^3O}$s as foundational models for molecule optimization, thereby tackling novel optimization tasks without resource-intensive retraining. $\mathtt{MoMUInstruct}$, models, and code are accessible through https://github.com/ninglab/GeLLMO.

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for evaluating Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks, their effectiveness is limited by their inability to appropriately weigh the importance of different topics, often overemphasizing minor details while undervaluing critical information, leading to misleading assessments. Our work proposes an efficient prompt design mechanism to address this specific limitation and provide a case study. Through strategic prompt engineering that incorporates explicit importance weighting mechanisms, we enhance using LLM-as-a-Judge ability to prioritize relevant information effectively, as demonstrated by an average improvement of 6% in the Human Alignment Rate (HAR) metric.

In this work, we propose Reinforced Functional Token Tuning (RFTT), a novel reinforced fine-tuning framework that empowers Large Language Models (LLMs) with self-play learn-to-reason capabilities. Unlike prior prompt-driven reasoning efforts, RFTT embeds a rich set of learnable functional tokens (e.g., , , ) directly into the model vocabulary, enabling chain-of-thought construction with diverse human-like reasoning behaviors. Specifically, RFTT comprises two phases: (1) supervised fine-tuning performs prompt-driven tree search to obtain self-generated training data annotated with functional tokens, which warms up the model to learn these tokens for reasoning; and (2) online reinforcement learning further allows the model to explore different reasoning pathways through functional token sampling without relying on prompts, thereby facilitating effective self-improvement for functional reasoning. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of the proposed RFTT on mathematical benchmarks, significantly boosting Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct (70.6% to 79.8%) and LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct (32.2% to 60.2%) on the MATH dataset. Moreover, the performance of RFTT consistently improves with more search rollouts at inference time. Our code is available at https://github.com/sastpg/RFTT.