When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. Claude Opus 5.5 promises to cut the chatter The successor to the notoriously chatty Claude Opus 5, the updated Opus model seems less prone to rambling about "loose ends" and other dangling threads. Better coding performance, improved safety and "alignment," and greater value are among Anthropic's selling points for its latest Claude Opus model. But for many Claude Opus users, one particular Opus 5.5 promise stands out: less chatter. Claude Opus 5.5 is the first new Claude model since Anthropic pledged to "pace" itself in the face of runaway AI development .

The conversation in the AI industry has largely been focused on slowing down AI development or "pacing the frontier," but that apparently won't stop Anthropic and OpenAI from releasing new models. Both companies are iterating on their previous releases, Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra, with new models that offer similar levels of performance but at lower costs. In the case of Claude, Anthropic says its new Opus 5.5 model is better at handling complex work, "finding and fixing inefficiencies in software" and financial analysis and business work -- all pitches laser-targeted at Anthropic's enterprise customers. Anthropic's benchmarks claim Opus 5.5 also scored better at agentic coding than GPT-6 Astra on both Terminal-Bench 4.0 and FrontierCode v1.1 (Main), which could make it more appealing for developers. Improvements extend outside of the tasks the model can handle and to how it works: Anthropic claims Opus 5.5 produces writing that's easier to understand, and that it "attempted to circumvent boundaries around 85 percent less often" than past models, suggesting it'll disobey directions less often.

Look Up Mashable's Best: E-readers, robovacs, laptops, earbuds, smart home and more Say More Safety Net Versus Mashable Selects Creator Playbook In My Bag Trending Now Back to School Good Connection: Uplifting stories for a digital age Switch Off All Series Anthropic launches Claude Opus 5.5, promising Fable-level performance at a lower price Anthropic says its new model rivals Fable 5.1 on most tasks while costing 40 percent less to run than Opus 5. Chance Townsend is the General Assignments Editor at Mashable, covering tech, video games, dating apps, digital culture, and whatever else comes his way. He has a Master's in Journalism from the University of North Texas and is a proud orange cat father. His writing has also appeared in PC Mag and . Anthropic has released Claude Opus 5.5, a new AI model the company says performs at roughly the same level as its Claude Fable 5.1 model on most work, but at a significantly lower cost. The model, announced on Tuesday, Sept. 22, is the first in Anthropic's new Claude 5.5 family.

Claude Opus 5.5 delivers Fable 5.1 performance - and costs 40% less Anthropic's newest Claude model aims to make frontier AI cheaper, faster, and safer, while giving subscribers more breathing room before those frustrating usage limits kick in. Computer science professor turned AI innovator David Gewirtz has spent over thirty years driving advancements at the forefront of artificial intelligence and is the recipient of the Sigma Xi Research Award in Engineering. Claude Opus 5.5 could be a big win for power users. Developers may see faster coding with fewer steps. Anthropic says the upgrade is safer, cheaper, and less wordy.

America will be AI DOMINANT!" Get your news from a source that's not owned and controlled by oligarchs. In recent weeks, a fresh crop of people connected to the artificial intelligence industry have emerged to warn that AI is possibly going to kill us all, spreading the word with various degrees of credibility or self-interest. Anthropic chief and co-founder Dario Amodei has also called to slow down the development of AI technology, a recommendation that Sam Altman of OpenAI and even notorious good judgment-haver Elon Musk quickly cosigned. Meanwhile, the Trump administration and the president himself have continued to insist that AI is essential for American technological advancement and military might. As a very strange public debate has ensued, it's become clear that Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and other people connected with the administration view AI as an essentially masculine tool: "dominant," a word they keep using over and over, powerful, and able to be kept in check only by a strong ruler. The Trump administration has become a place where very odd politics around both gender and "wokeness" are constantly on display. Trump issued a garbled executive order immediately upon retaking office that attempted to redefine "male" and "female ." Hegseth is obsessed with testosterone, announcing in July that military members will be screened for low T regardless of their gender. The intense focus on gender and wokeness has also been true of their approach to AI: Last year, the administration promised that it would require AI companies with federal contracts to make sure their large language models match the administration's views on things like climate change; transgender identity; and diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. Trump has turned "a debate about technology into a debate about who's got the phallus." It's now increasingly obvious that Trump and his administration view AI technology as something akin to a large, dangerous dog that only a masculine owner can control. Trump has repeatedly called warnings that AI could harm human beings "a hoax," writing on TruthSocial that the "only control or'guardrails' that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades!" "The people that say AI is going to destroy the World, and that Data Centers are bad for your neighborhood, are the same people that said, just a short time ago, that the World would be extinguished by'Climate Change,'" the president also posted, with his trademark random capitalization. "That HOAX never worked out for them, and now they're on to the next one.

There has been significant progress in using AI as a tool in the detection, prevention and treatment of cancer. There has been significant progress in using AI as a tool in the detection, prevention and treatment of cancer. Big tech says AI can find a cure for cancer. Alongside warnings about its ability to destroy humanity, artificial intelligence is also hailed for its potential to revolutionise health treatment. Just how far can it take us? June would be the last month she ever knew.

You're viewing the US edition You can switch to the UK or AU homepage at any time using this menu. 'Uncle George' Clooney rushes to Kaia Gerber's house as his heartbreaking notes to Presley are revealed: Actor in utter agony over death of'second son'... after desperate attempts to save him ended in disaster Nightmare for Kash Patel as hackers'steal data on EVERY FBI agent' and issue chilling Trump threat There's a hidden message in Diana's brother's vengeful new book. No wonder William has kept silent... Harry's role in this is so suspect: MAUREEN CALLAHAN What REALLY goes on in some Equinox steam rooms: Gym insiders reveal eye-popping indecency... secret towel signals used by experimental married men... and clubs with most'aggressive' locker rooms Married father, 56, named as man who jumped off Carnival cruise ship during 15th wedding anniversary trip with wife... as grieving sister shares heartbreaking theory on why he did it A fleeting look in Patrick Clancy's eyes during his 60 Minutes interview sent shockwaves through me... this is the truth about him and his pregnant new wife that must be said: KENNEDY SARAH VINE: My message to the four-times married colossal cad Earl Spencer: People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones Taylor Swift reveals bombshell return to music with new single Patient Zero... after sending fans into MELTDOWN over mysterious countdown NASCAR star admits he got his'a** kicked' in brutal post-race punch-up with rival... after wild video emerged of pit row brawl Why it really DOES matter what time of day you take your blood pressure pills. Truth about Adriana Lima's dramatic face transformation... and why surgeons say it could easily happen to you Trump's six-word little white lie to Zohran Mamdani reveals surprising affection for his old foe Presley Gerber's'inevitable' death: Family insiders reveal life-long secret struggle that sparked'self-destruct' spiral... and mother Cindy Crawford's desperate bid to save him before shock death at 27 Staff at leading AI companies and safety institutions are being signed off from work with stress, according to a new report. According to reporting by the Financial Times, top researchers at OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, and the UK's AI Security Institute (AISI), have reported burnout and stress due to developing powerful AIs.

Follow this author to personalize your feed and get instant alerts. Follow Go to your personalized feed WHY FOLLOW? Smart Alerts: Get notified about major news as it happens. OpenAI is split into three divisions. There is Research, where the frontier models are trained.

Viture's first display-free smart glasses have bone-conduction microphones to privately record your daily musings. David Jiang, cofounder and CEO of smart glasses company Viture, tells me about how he used to yell at his kid. His 10-year-old son played tennis. During tournaments, Jiang says he had a habit of shouting and criticizing his son's mistakes as he played. He wanted to apply pressure to make him succeed--it was the way he'd been taught to raise kids, after all.

The Download: why AI's latest breakthroughs and fears may be more hype than reality Plus: 22 nations have called for a new global body to oversee AI. Don't be fooled by this summer of AI hype It's been a busy few months for AI hype, with companies making breathless claims about hacking, mathematical breakthroughs, and the prospect of self-improving superintelligence. In all these cases, massive fanfare from the companies, presented as mea culpas in the hacking incidents, has been accompanied by intense press coverage. But once experts have had time to examine what happened, very different stories emerge. There's a strong commercial incentive to overstate AI capabilities. The authors argue that the illusion of speed and urgency promulgated by the tech companies is also a ploy to misdirect policymakers and the public.