Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is a widely used preference optimization algorithm in large language model (LLM) alignment, which reparameterizes the reward function in reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) without requiring a separate reward model. However, during the DPO training process, when a large negative gradient is applied to low-confidence samples, LLMs with a softmax output head tend to squeeze the confidence in the model's output distribution towards the highest-confidence sentence, which may lead to a decrease in the confidence of both preference and non-preference samples, while increasing the confidence of unrelated tokens. This phenomenon becomes more complex in reasoning tasks. In this work, focusing on reasoning tasks, we propose VPO, a negative gradient constraint method for human non-preference samples based on $\mathcal{V}$-usable information. By using $\mathcal{V}$-usable information to measure the similarity between preference pairs and selectively constrain the negative gradient, VPO can alleviate the squeezing effect of DPO, enhance alignment with the generation objective, and maintain the model's ability to distinguish between preference and non-preference samples. We compare VPO with DPO and its latest variants on mathematical reasoning tasks using the LLama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 series, including both Base and Instruct models. Our results demonstrate that VPO consistently and significantly outperforms existing methods.

The success of DeepSeek-R1 demonstrates the immense potential of using reinforcement learning (RL) to enhance LLMs' reasoning capabilities. This paper introduces Retrv-R1, the first R1-style MLLM specifically designed for multimodal universal retrieval, achieving higher performance by employing step-by-step reasoning to produce more accurate retrieval results. We find that directly applying the methods of DeepSeek-R1 to retrieval tasks is not feasible, mainly due to (1) the high computational cost caused by the large token consumption required for multiple candidates with reasoning processes, and (2) the instability and suboptimal results when directly applying RL to train for retrieval tasks. To address these issues, Retrv-R1 introduces an information compression module with a details inspection mechanism, which enhances computational efficiency by reducing the number of tokens while ensuring that critical information for challenging candidates is preserved. Additionally, a new training paradigm is proposed, including an activation stage using a retrieval-tailored synthetic CoT dataset for more effective optimization, followed by RL with a novel curriculum reward to improve both performance and efficiency. Incorporating these novel designs, Retrv-R1 achieves SOTA performance, high efficiency, and strong generalization ability, as demonstrated by extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks and tasks.

Using ideas from scaling laws, our system *Genesys* employs a *Ladder of Scales* approach; new designs are proposed, adversarially reviewed, implemented, and selectively verified at increasingly larger model scales (14M$\sim$350M parameters) with a narrowing budget (the number of models we can train at each scale). To help make discovery efficient and factorizable, Genesys uses a novel genetic programming backbone, which we show has empirical advantages over commonly used direct prompt generation workflows (e.g., $\sim$86\% percentage point improvement in successful design generation, a key bottleneck). We report experiments involving 1,162 newly discovered designs (1,062 fully verified) and find the best designs to be competitive with known architectures (e.g., outperform GPT2, Mamba2, etc., on 6/9 common benchmarks). We couple these results with comprehensive system-level ablations and formal results, which give broader insights into the design of effective autonomous discovery systems.

Preference alignment methods are increasingly critical for steering large language models (LLMs) to generate outputs consistent with human values. While recent approaches often rely on synthetic data generated by LLMs for scalability and cost-efficiency reasons, this reliance can introduce distributional shifts that undermine the nuanced representation of human preferences needed for desirable outputs. In this paper, we propose a novel distribution-aware optimization framework that improves preference alignment despite such shifts. Our approach first leverages well-learned classifiers to assign a calibration value to each training sample, quantifying its alignment with the target human-preferred distribution. These values are then incorporated into a robust optimization objective that minimizes the worst-case loss over regions of the data space most relevant to human preferences. By explicitly focusing optimization on the target distribution, our approach mitigates the impact of distributional mismatch and improves the generation of responses that better reflect intended values.

In recent years, large language models with Transformer architecture as the core have made breakthrough progress in many fields. At the same time, there are also some weaknesses in the large language model that have prompted people to reflect, among which the most fundamental one is the reflection on the Transformer architecture. The Transformer architecture has high parallelism and can fully utilize the computing power of GPUs, thus replacing models such as LSTM in the past few years. However, high parallelism is not a free lunch, as it fundamentally limits the performance of models. Especially, the problems that logarithmic precision Transformer architecture can solve are strictly limited to the $TC^0$.

Cybersecurity and software research have crossed paths with modern deep learning research for a few years. The power of large language models (LLMs) in particular has intrigued us to apply them to understanding binary code. In this paper, we investigate some of the many ways LLMs can be applied to binary code similarity detection, as it is a significantly more difficult task compared to source code similarity detection due to the sparsity of information and less meaningful syntax. It also has great practical implications, such as vulnerability and malware detection. We find that pretrained LLMs are mostly capable of detecting similar binary code, even with a zero-shot setting. Our main contributions and findings are to provide several supervised fine-tuning methods that, when combined, significantly surpass zero-shot LLMs and state-of-the-art binary code similarity detection methods.

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are frequently updated, LoRA weights trained on earlier versions quickly become obsolete. The conventional practice of retraining LoRA weights from scratch on the latest model is costly, time-consuming, and environmentally detrimental, particularly as the diversity of LLMs and downstream tasks expands. This motivates a critical question: How can we efficiently leverage existing LoRA weights to adapt to newer model versions? To address this, we propose LoRASuite, a modular approach tailored specifically to various types of LLM updates. First, we compute a transfer matrix utilizing known parameters from both old and new LLMs.

Embodied agents powered by large language models (LLMs), such as Voyager, promise open-ended competence in worlds such as Minecraft. However, when powered by open-weight LLMs they still falter on elementary tasks after domain-specific fine-tuning. We propose MindForge, a generative-agent framework for cultural lifelong learning through explicit perspective taking. We introduce three key innovations: (1) a structured theory of mind representation linking percepts, beliefs, desires, and actions; (2) natural inter-agent communication; and (3) a multi-component memory system. Following the cultural learning framework, we test MindForge in both instructive and collaborative settings within Minecraft. In an instructive setting with GPT-4, MindForge agents powered by open-weight LLMs significantly outperform their Voyager counterparts in basic tasks yielding $3\times$ more tech-tree milestones and collecting $2.3\times$ more unique items than the Voyager baseline. Furthermore, in fully collaborative settings, we find that the performance of two underachieving agents improves with more communication rounds, echoing the Condorcet Jury Theorem. MindForge agents demonstrate sophisticated behaviors, including expert-novice knowledge transfer, collaborative problem solving, and adaptation to out-of-distribution tasks through accumulated cultural experiences.

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly capable, security and safety evaluation are crucial. While current red teaming approaches have made strides in assessing LLM vulnerabilities, they often rely heavily on human input and lack comprehensive coverage of emerging attack vectors. This paper introduces AutoRedTeamer, a novel framework for fully automated, end-to-end red teaming against LLMs. AutoRedTeamer combines a multi-agent architecture with a memory-guided attack selection mechanism to enable continuous discovery and integration of new attack vectors. The dual-agent framework consists of a red teaming agent that can operate from high-level risk categories alone to generate and execute test cases, and a strategy proposer agent that autonomously discovers and implements new attacks by analyzing recent research. This modular design allows AutoRedTeamer to adapt to emerging threats while maintaining strong performance on existing attack vectors. We demonstrate AutoRedTeamer's effectiveness across diverse evaluation settings, achieving 20% higher attack success rates on HarmBench against Llama-3.1-70B

Large Language Models (LLMs) are now integral across various domains and have demonstrated impressive performance. Progress, however, rests on the premise that benchmark scores are both accurate and reproducible. We demonstrate that the reproducibility of LLM performance is fragile: changing system configuration, such as evaluation batch size, GPU count, and GPU version, can introduce significant differences in the generated responses. This issue is especially pronounced in reasoning models, where minor rounding differences in early tokens can cascade into divergent chains of thought, ultimately affecting accuracy. For instance, under bfloat16 precision with greedy decoding, a reasoning model like DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B can exhibit up to 9\% variation in accuracy and 9,000 tokens difference in response length due to differences in GPU count, type, and evaluation batch size.