Recent work in computational psycholinguistics has revealed intriguing parallels between attention mechanisms and human memory retrieval, focusing primarily on Transformer architectures that operate on token-level representations. However, computational psycholinguistic research has also established that syntactic structures provide compelling explanations for human sentence processing that word-level factors alone cannot fully account for. In this study, we investigate whether the attention mechanism of Transformer Grammar (TG), which uniquely operates on syntactic structures as representational units, can serve as a cognitive model of human memory retrieval, using Normalized Attention Entropy (NAE) as a linking hypothesis between model behavior and human processing difficulty. Our experiments demonstrate that TG's attention achieves superior predictive power for self-paced reading times compared to vanilla Transformer's, with further analyses revealing independent contributions from both models. These findings suggest that human sentence processing involves dual memory representations -- one based on syntactic structures and another on token sequences -- with attention serving as the general retrieval algorithm, while highlighting the importance of incorporating syntactic structures as representational units.

Grammatical error classification plays a crucial role in language learning systems, but existing classification taxonomies often lack rigorous validation, leading to inconsistencies and unreliable feedback. In this paper, we revisit previous classification taxonomies for grammatical errors by introducing a systematic and qualitative evaluation framework. Our approach examines four aspects of a taxonomy, i.e., exclusivity, coverage, balance, and usability. Then, we construct a high-quality grammatical error classification dataset annotated with multiple classification taxonomies and evaluate them grounding on our proposed evaluation framework. Our experiments reveal the drawbacks of existing taxonomies. Our contributions aim to improve the precision and effectiveness of error analysis, providing more understandable and actionable feedback for language learners.

One of the goals of automatic evaluation metrics in grammatical error correction (GEC) is to rank GEC systems such that it matches human preferences. However, current automatic evaluations are based on procedures that diverge from human evaluation. Specifically, human evaluation derives rankings by aggregating sentence-level relative evaluation results, e.g., pairwise comparisons, using a rating algorithm, whereas automatic evaluation averages sentence-level absolute scores to obtain corpus-level scores, which are then sorted to determine rankings. In this study, we propose an aggregation method for existing automatic evaluation metrics which aligns with human evaluation methods to bridge this gap. We conducted experiments using various metrics, including edit-based metrics, $n$-gram based metrics, and sentence-level metrics, and show that resolving the gap improves results for the most of metrics on the SEEDA benchmark. We also found that even BERT-based metrics sometimes outperform the metrics of GPT-4. We publish our unified implementation of the metrics and meta-evaluations.

Question Under Discussion (QUD), which is originally a linguistic analytic framework, gains increasing attention in the community of natural language processing over the years. Various models have been proposed for implementing QUD for discourse processing. This survey summarizes these models, with a focus on application to written texts, and examines studies that explore the relationship between QUD and mainstream discourse frameworks, including RST, PDTB and SDRT. Some questions that may require further study are suggested.

Large language models (LLMs) are able to generate human-like responses to user queries. However, LLMs exhibit inherent limitations, especially because they hallucinate. This paper introduces LP-LM, a system that grounds answers to questions in known facts contained in a knowledge base (KB), facilitated through semantic parsing in Prolog, and always produces answers that are reliable. LP-LM generates a most probable constituency parse tree along with a corresponding Prolog term for an input question via Prolog definite clause grammar (DCG) parsing. The term is then executed against a KB of natural language sentences also represented as Prolog terms for question answering. By leveraging DCG and tabling, LP-LM runs in linear time in the size of input sentences for sufficiently many grammar rules. Performing experiments comparing LP-LM with current well-known LLMs in accuracy, we show that LLMs hallucinate on even simple questions, unlike LP-LM.

Grammatical error correction (GEC) aims to correct grammatical, spelling, and semantic errors in natural language text. With the growing of large language models (LLMs), direct text generation has gradually become the focus of the GEC methods, and few-shot in-context learning presents a cost-effective solution. However, selecting effective in-context examples remains challenging, as the similarity between input texts does not necessarily correspond to similar grammatical error patterns. In this paper, we propose a novel retrieval method based on natural language grammatical error explanations (GEE) to address this issue. Our method retrieves suitable few-shot demonstrations by matching the GEE of the test input with that of pre-constructed database samples, where explanations for erroneous samples are generated by LLMs. We conducted multilingual GEC few-shot experiments on both major open-source and closed-source LLMs. Experiments across five languages show that our method outperforms existing semantic and BM25-based retrieval techniques, without requiring additional training or language adaptation. This also suggests that matching error patterns is key to selecting examples.

We develop an algorithm to semantically parse linear ordering problems, which require a model to arrange entities using deductive reasoning. Our method takes as input a number of premises and candidate statements, parsing them to a first-order logic of an ordering domain, and then utilizes constraint logic programming to infer the truth of proposed statements about the ordering. Our semantic parser transforms Heim and Kratzer's syntax-based compositional formal semantic rules to a computational algorithm. This transformation involves introducing abstract types and templates based on their rules, and introduces a dynamic component to interpret entities within a contextual framework. Our symbolic system, the Formal Semantic Logic Inferer (FSLI), is applied to answer multiple choice questions in BIG-bench's logical_deduction multiple choice problems, achieving perfect accuracy, compared to 67.06% for the best-performing LLM (GPT-4) and 87.63% for the hybrid system Logic-LM. These promising results demonstrate the benefit of developing a semantic parsing algorithm driven by first-order logic constructs.

The authors should be commended for writing and submitting a solid paper on semantic parsing and program synthesis that was clearly written, deemed interesting, and contained good and compelling experimental results.

This report details Lumen Labs' novel approach to processing Social Networking Service (SNS) data. We leverage knowledge distillation, specifically a simple distillation method inspired by DeepSeek-R1's CoT acquisition, combined with prompt hacking, to extract valuable training data from the Grok model. This data is then used to fine-tune a Phi-3-mini model, augmented with a mask-like mechanism specifically designed for handling the nuances of SNS data. Our method demonstrates state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on several SNS data processing tasks, outperforming existing models like Grok, Phi-3, and GPT-4. We provide a comprehensive analysis of our approach, including mathematical formulations, engineering details, ablation studies, and comparative evaluations.

We present our solution to the AAAI-25 VRD-IU challenge, achieving first place in the competition. Our approach integrates large margin loss for improved feature discrimination and employs heuristic rules to refine hierarchical relationships. By combining a deep learning-based matching strategy with greedy algorithms, we achieve a significant boost in accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency. Our method attains an accuracy of 0.98904 on the private leaderboard, demonstrating its effectiveness in document structure parsing. Source codes are publicly available at https://github.com/ffyyytt/VRUID-AAAI-DAKiet