In multi-label learning, a particular case of multi-task learning where a single data point is associated with multiple target labels, it was widely assumed in the literature that, to obtain best accuracy, the dependence among the labels should be explicitly modeled. This premise led to a proliferation of methods offering techniques to learn and predict labels together, for example where the prediction for one label influences predictions for other labels. Even though it is now acknowledged that in many contexts a model of dependence is not required for optimal performance, such models continue to outperform independent models in some of those very contexts, suggesting alternative explanations for their performance beyond label dependence, which the literature is only recently beginning to unravel. Leveraging and extending recent discoveries, we turn the original premise of multi-label learning on its head, and approach the problem of joint-modeling specifically under the absence of any measurable dependence among task labels; for example, when task labels come from separate problem domains. We shift insights from this study towards building an approach for transfer learning that challenges the long-held assumption that transferability of tasks comes from measurements of similarity between the source and target domains or models. This allows us to design and test a method for transfer learning, which is model driven rather than purely data driven, and furthermore it is black box and model-agnostic (any base model class can be considered). We show that essentially we can create task-dependence based on source-model capacity. The results we obtain have important implications and provide clear directions for future work, both in the areas of multi-label and transfer learning.

Gathering cyber threat intelligence from open sources is becoming increasingly important for maintaining and achieving a high level of security as systems become larger and more complex. However, these open sources are often subject to information overload. It is therefore useful to apply machine learning models that condense the amount of information to what is necessary. Yet, previous studies and applications have shown that existing classifiers are not able to extract specific information about emerging cybersecurity events due to their low generalization ability. Therefore, we propose a system to overcome this problem by training a new classifier for each new incident. Since this requires a lot of labelled data using standard training methods, we combine three different low-data regime techniques - transfer learning, data augmentation, and few-shot learning - to train a high-quality classifier from very few labelled instances. We evaluated our approach using a novel dataset derived from the Microsoft Exchange Server data breach of 2021 which was labelled by three experts. Our findings reveal an increase in F1 score of more than 21 points compared to standard training methods and more than 18 points compared to a state-of-the-art method in few-shot learning. Furthermore, the classifier trained with this method and 32 instances is only less than 5 F1 score points worse than a classifier trained with 1800 instances.

Posted by Akib Uddin, Product Manager and Andrew Sellergren, Software Engineer, Google Health Every year, nearly a billion chest X-ray (C...

High-end vehicles have been furnished with a number of electronic control units (ECUs), which provide upgrading functions to enhance the driving experience. The controller area network (CAN) is a well-known protocol that connects these ECUs because of its modesty and efficiency. However, the CAN bus is vulnerable to various types of attacks. Although the intrusion detection system (IDS) is proposed to address the security problem of the CAN bus, most previous studies only provide alerts when attacks occur without knowing the specific type of attack. Moreover, an IDS is designed for a specific car model due to diverse car manufacturers. In this study, we proposed a novel deep learning model called supervised contrastive (SupCon) ResNet, which can handle multiple attack identification on the CAN bus. Furthermore, the model can be used to improve the performance of a limited-size dataset using a transfer learning technique. The capability of the proposed model is evaluated on two real car datasets. When tested with the car hacking dataset, the experiment results show that the SupCon ResNet model improves the overall false-negative rates of four types of attack by four times on average, compared to other models. In addition, the model achieves the highest F1 score at 0.9994 on the survival dataset by utilizing transfer learning. Finally, the model can adapt to hardware constraints in terms of memory size and running time.

Reliable evaluation benchmarks designed for replicability and comprehensiveness have driven progress in machine learning. Due to the lack of a multilingual benchmark, however, vision-and-language research has mostly focused on English language tasks. To fill this gap, we introduce the Image-Grounded Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark. IGLUE brings together - by both aggregating pre-existing datasets and creating new ones - visual question answering, cross-modal retrieval, grounded reasoning, and grounded entailment tasks across 20 diverse languages. Our benchmark enables the evaluation of multilingual multimodal models for transfer learning, not only in a zero-shot setting, but also in newly defined few-shot learning setups. Based on the evaluation of the available state-of-the-art models, we find that translate-test transfer is superior to zero-shot transfer and that few-shot learning is hard to harness for many tasks. Moreover, downstream performance is partially explained by the amount of available unlabelled textual data for pretraining, and only weakly by the typological distance of target-source languages. We hope to encourage future research efforts in this area by releasing the benchmark to the community.

Both time series classification and transfer learning have increasingly been the focus of research in recent years. However, only a limited number of studies have combined time series classification with transfer learning. Time series classification (TSC) is the task of training a classifier to map a given time series input to a probability distribution over the possible class values. Typically, transfer learning (TL) algorithms learn from a source dataset and task and then apply the knowledge gained to another target dataset and task. TL has received considerable attention in the domains of computer vision and natural language processing, but less research attention has been devoted to the task of TSC, which is lacking a state-of-the-art pretrained model that can serve as a good starting point for new TSC tasks.

Text readability assessment has a wide range of applications for different target people, from language learners to people with disabilities. The fast pace of textual content production on the web makes it impossible to measure text complexity without the benefit of machine learning and natural language processing techniques. Although various research addressed the readability assessment of English text in recent years, there is still room for improvement of the models for other languages. In this paper, we proposed a new model for text complexity assessment for German text based on transfer learning. Our results show that the model outperforms more classical solutions based on linguistic features extraction from input text.

Despite achieving state-of-the-art zero-shot performance, existing vision-language models still fall short of few-shot transfer ability on domain-specific problems. Classical fine-tuning often fails to prevent highly expressive models from exploiting spurious correlations. Although model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) presents as a natural alternative for few-shot transfer learning, the expensive computation due to implicit second-order optimization limits its use on large-scale vision-language models such as CLIP. While much literature has been devoted to exploring alternative optimization strategies, we identify another essential aspect towards effective few-shot transfer learning, task sampling, which is previously only be viewed as part of data pre-processing in MAML. To show the impact of task sampling, we propose a simple algorithm, Model-Agnostic Multitask Fine-tuning (MAMF), which differentiates classical fine-tuning only on uniformly sampling multiple tasks. Despite its simplicity, we show that MAMF consistently outperforms classical fine-tuning on five few-shot vision-language classification tasks. We further show that the effectiveness of the bi-level optimization in MAML is highly sensitive to the zero-shot performance of a task in the context of few-shot vision-language classification. The goal of this paper is to provide new insights on what makes few-shot learning work, and encourage more research into investigating better task sampling strategies.

We propose two novel transferability metrics F-OTCE (Fast Optimal Transport based Conditional Entropy) and JC-OTCE (Joint Correspondence OTCE) to evaluate how much the source model (task) can benefit the learning of the target task and to learn more transferable representations for cross-domain cross-task transfer learning. Unlike the existing metric that requires evaluating the empirical transferability on auxiliary tasks, our metrics are auxiliary-free such that they can be computed much more efficiently. Specifically, F-OTCE estimates transferability by first solving an Optimal Transport (OT) problem between source and target distributions, and then uses the optimal coupling to compute the Negative Conditional Entropy between source and target labels. It can also serve as a loss function to maximize the transferability of the source model before finetuning on the target task. Meanwhile, JC-OTCE improves the transferability robustness of F-OTCE by including label distances in the OT problem, though it may incur additional computation cost. Extensive experiments demonstrate that F-OTCE and JC-OTCE outperform state-of-the-art auxiliary-free metrics by 18.85% and 28.88%, respectively in correlation coefficient with the ground-truth transfer accuracy. By eliminating the training cost of auxiliary tasks, the two metrics reduces the total computation time of the previous method from 43 minutes to 9.32s and 10.78s, respectively, for a pair of tasks. When used as a loss function, F-OTCE shows consistent improvements on the transfer accuracy of the source model in few-shot classification experiments, with up to 4.41% accuracy gain.

This primer is an attempt to provide a detailed summary of the different facets of lifelong learning. We start with Chapter 2 which provides a high-level overview of lifelong learning systems. In this chapter, we discuss prominent scenarios in lifelong learning (Section 2.4), provide 8 Introduction a high-level organization of different lifelong learning approaches (Section 2.5), enumerate the desiderata for an ideal lifelong learning system (Section 2.6), discuss how lifelong learning is related to other learning paradigms (Section 2.7), describe common metrics used to evaluate lifelong learning systems (Section 2.8). This chapter is more useful for readers who are new to lifelong learning and want to get introduced to the field without focusing on specific approaches or benchmarks. The remaining chapters focus on specific aspects (either learning algorithms or benchmarks) and are more useful for readers who are looking for specific approaches or benchmarks. Chapter 3 focuses on regularization-based approaches that do not assume access to any data from previous tasks. Chapter 4 discusses memory-based approaches that typically use a replay buffer or an episodic memory to save subset of data across different tasks. Chapter 5 focuses on different architecture families (and their instantiations) that have been proposed for training lifelong learning systems. Following these different classes of learning algorithms, we discuss the commonly used evaluation benchmarks and metrics for lifelong learning (Chapter 6) and wrap up with a discussion of future challenges and important research directions in Chapter 7.