Statistical Learning
Unsupervised and Supervised Clustering: The Mutual Information between Parameters and Observations
Herschkowitz, Didier, Nadal, Jean-Pierre
Recent works in parameter estimation and neural coding have demonstrated that optimal performance are related to the mutual information between parameters and data. We consider the mutual information in the case where the dependency in the parameter (a vector 8) of the conditional p.d.f. of each observation (a vector
Probabilistic Visualisation of High-Dimensional Binary Data
We present a probabilistic latent-variable framework for data visualisation, a key feature of which is its applicability to binary and categorical data types for which few established methods exist. A variational approximation to the likelihood is exploited to derive a fast algorithm for determining the model parameters. Illustrations of application to real and synthetic binary data sets are given.
Graph Matching for Shape Retrieval
Huet, Benoit, Cross, Andrew D. J., Hancock, Edwin R.
We propose a new in-sample cross validation based method (randomized GACV) for choosing smoothing or bandwidth parameters that govern the bias-variance or fit-complexity tradeoff in'soft' classification. Soft classification refers to a learning procedure which estimates the probability that an example with a given attribute vector is in class 1 vs class O. The target for optimizing the the tradeoff is the Kullback-Liebler distance between the estimated probability distribution and the'true' probability distribution, representing knowledge of an infinite population. The method uses a randomized estimate of the trace of a Hessian and mimics cross validation at the cost of a single relearning with perturbed outcome data.
Semiparametric Support Vector and Linear Programming Machines
Smola, Alex J., Frieß, Thilo-Thomas, Schölkopf, Bernhard
In fact, for many of the kernels used (not the polynomial kernels) like Gaussian rbf-kernels it can be shown [6] that SV machines are universal approximators. While this is advantageous in general, parametric models are useful techniques in their own right. Especially if one happens to have additional knowledge about the problem, it would be unwise not to take advantage of it. For instance it might be the case that the major properties of the data are described by a combination of a small set of linear independent basis functions {¢Jt (.),..., ¢n (.)}. Or one may want to correct the data for some (e.g.
Dynamically Adapting Kernels in Support Vector Machines
Cristianini, Nello, Campbell, Colin, Shawe-Taylor, John
The kernel-parameter is one of the few tunable parameters in Support Vector machines, controlling the complexity of the resulting hypothesis. Its choice amounts to model selection and its value is usually found by means of a validation set. We present an algorithm which can automatically perform model selection with little additional computational cost and with no need of a validation set. In this procedure model selection and learning are not separate, but kernels are dynamically adjusted during the learning process to find the kernel parameter which provides the best possible upper bound on the generalisation error. Theoretical results motivating the approach and experimental results confirming its validity are presented.
Neural Networks for Density Estimation
Magdon-Ismail, Malik, Atiya, Amir F.
Even if the underlying phenomena are inherently deterministic, the complexity of these phenomena often makes a probabilistic formulation the only feasible approach from the computational point of view. Although quantities such as the mean, the variance, and possibly higher order moments of a random variable have often been sufficient to characterize a particular problem, the quest for higher modeling accuracy, and for more realistic assumptions drives us towards modeling the available random variables using their probability density. This of course leads us to the problem of density estimation (see [6]). The most common approach for density estimation is the nonparametric approach, where the density is determined according to a formula involving the data points available. The most common non parametric methods are the kernel density estimator, also known as the Parzen window estimator [4] and the k-nearest neighbor technique [1].
Semi-Supervised Support Vector Machines
Bennett, Kristin P., Demiriz, Ayhan
We introduce a semi-supervised support vector machine (S3yM) method. Given a training set of labeled data and a working set of unlabeled data, S3YM constructs a support vector machine using both the training and working sets. We use S3 YM to solve the transduction problem using overall risk minimization (ORM) posed by Yapnik. The transduction problem is to estimate the value of a classification function at the given points in the working set. This contrasts with the standard inductive learning problem of estimating the classification function at all possible values and then using the fixed function to deduce the classes of the working set data.
A High Performance k-NN Classifier Using a Binary Correlation Matrix Memory
Zhou, Ping, Austin, Jim, Kennedy, John
This paper presents a novel and fast k-NN classifier that is based on a binary CMM (Correlation Matrix Memory) neural network. A robust encoding method is developed to meet CMM input requirements. A hardware implementation of the CMM is described, which gives over 200 times the speed of a current mid-range workstation, and is scaleable to very large problems. When tested on several benchmarks and compared with a simple k-NN method, the CMM classifier gave less than I % lower accuracy and over 4 and 12 times speedup in software and hardware respectively.