Effective methods of capacity control via uniform convergence bounds for function expansions have been largely limited to Support Vector machines, where good bounds are obtainable by the entropy number approach. We extend these methods to systems with expansions in terms of arbitrary (parametrized) basis functions and a wide range of regularization methods covering the whole range of general linear additive models. This is achieved by a data dependent analysis of the eigenvalues of the corresponding design matrix.

Although one can derive the Gaussian noise assumption based on a maximum entropy approach, the main reason for this assumption is practicability: under the Gaussian noise assumption the maximum likelihood parameter estimate can simply be found by minimization of the squared error. Despite its common use it is far from clear that the Gaussian noise assumption is a good choice for many practical problems. A reasonable approach therefore would be a noise distribution which contains the Gaussian as a special case but which has a tunable parameter that allows for more flexible distributions.

We discuss an information theoretic approach for categorizing and modeling dynamic processes. The approach can learn a compact and informative statistic which summarizes past states to predict future observations. Furthermore, the uncertainty of the prediction is characterized nonparametrically by a joint density over the learned statistic and present observation. We discuss the application of the technique to both noise driven dynamical systems and random processes sampled from a density which is conditioned on the past. In the first case we show results in which both the dynamics of random walk and the statistics of the driving noise are captured. In the second case we present results in which a summarizing statistic is learned on noisy random telegraph waves with differing dependencies on past states. In both cases the algorithm yields a principled approach for discriminating processes with differing dynamics and/or dependencies. The method is grounded in ideas from information theory and nonparametric statistics.

In this article we study the effects of introducing structure in the input distribution of the data to be learnt by a simple perceptron. We determine the learning curves within the framework of Statistical Mechanics. Stepwise generalization occurs as a function of the number of examples when the distribution of patterns is highly anisotropic. Although extremely simple, the model seems to capture the relevant features of a class of Support Vector Machines which was recently shown to present this behavior.

The support vector machine (SVM) is a state-of-the-art technique for regression and classification, combining excellent generalisation properties with a sparse kernel representation. However, it does suffer from a number of disadvantages, notably the absence of probabilistic outputs, the requirement to estimate a tradeoff parameter and the need to utilise'Mercer' kernel functions. In this paper we introduce the Relevance Vector Machine (RVM), a Bayesian treatment of a generalised linear model of identical functional form to the SVM. The RVM suffers from none of the above disadvantages, and examples demonstrate that for comparable generalisation performance, the RVM requires dramatically fewer kernel functions.

For many problems, the correct behavior of a model depends not only on its input-output mapping but also on properties of its Jacobian matrix, the matrix of partial derivatives of the model's outputs with respect to its inputs. We introduce the J-prop algorithm, an efficient general method for computing the exact partial derivatives of a variety of simple functions of the Jacobian of a model with respect to its free parameters. The algorithm applies to any parametrized feedforward model, including nonlinear regression, multilayer perceptrons, and radial basis function networks.

The Karush-Kuhn-Tucker Theorem is used to derive conditions for determining whether or not a given working set is optimal. These conditions become the algorithm)s termination criteria) as an alternative to Osuna)s criteria (also used by Joachims without modification) which used conditions for individual points. The advantage of the new conditions is that knowledge of the hyperplane)s constant factor b) which in some cases is difficult to compute) is not required. Further investigation of the new termination conditions allows to form the strategy for selecting an optimal working set. The new algorithm is applicable to the pattern recognition SVM) and is provably equivalent to Joachims) algorithm. One can also interpret the new algorithm in the sense of the method of feasible directions. Experimental results presented in the last section demonstrate superior performance of the new method in comparison with traditional training of regression SVM. 2 General Principles of Regression SVM Decomposition The original decomposition algorithm proposed for the pattern recognition SVM in [2] has been extended to the regression SVM in [4]. For the sake of completeness I will repeat the main steps of this extension with the aim of providing terse and streamlined notation to lay the ground for working set selection.

Visualization of input data and feature selection are intimately related. A good feature selection algorithm can identify meaningful coordinate projections for low dimensional data visualization. Conversely, a good visualization technique can suggest meaningful features to include in a model. Input variable selection is the most important step in the model selection process. Given a target variable, a set of input variables can be selected as explanatory variables by some prior knowledge.

The idea of a large minimum margin [17] explains the good generalization performance of AdaBoost in the low noise regime. However, AdaBoost performs worse on noisy tasks [10, 11], such as the iris and the breast cancer benchmark data sets [1]. On the latter tasks, a large margin on all training points cannot be achieved without adverse effects on the generalization error. This experimental observation was supported by the study of [13] where the generalization error of ensemble methods was bounded by the sum of the fraction of training points which have a margin smaller than some value p, say, plus a complexity term depending on the base hypotheses and p. While this bound can only capture part of what is going on in practice, it nevertheless already conveys the message that in some cases it pays to allow for some points which have a small margin, or are misclassified, if this leads to a larger overall margin on the remaining points. To cope with this problem, it was mandatory to construct regularized variants of AdaBoost, which traded off the number of margin errors and the size of the margin 562 G. Riitsch, B. Sch6lkopf, A. J. Smola, K.-R.

Simply changing the potential function allows one to create new algorithms related to AdaBoost. However, these new algorithms are generally not known to have the formal boosting property. This paper examines the question of which potential functions lead to new algorithms that are boosters. The two main results are general sets of conditions on the potential; one set implies that the resulting algorithm is a booster, while the other implies that the algorithm is not. These conditions are applied to previously studied potential functions, such as those used by LogitBoost and Doom II.