Statistical Learning
On Discriminative vs. Generative Classifiers: A comparison of logistic regression and naive Bayes
Ng, Andrew Y., Jordan, Michael I.
Discriminative classifiers model the posterior p(ylx)directly, or learn a direct map from inputs x to the class labels. There are several compelling reasons for using discriminative rather than generative classifiers, oneof which, succinctly articulated by Vapnik [6], is that "one should solve the [classification] problem directly and never solve a more general problem as an intermediate step [such as modeling p(xly)]." Indeed, leaving aside computational issues and matters such as handling missing data, the prevailing consensus seems to be that discriminative classifiers are almost always to be preferred to generative ones. Anotherpiece of prevailing folk wisdom is that the number of examples needed to fit a model is often roughly linear in the number of free parameters of a model. This has its theoretical basis in the observation that for "many" models, the VC dimension is roughly linear or at most some low-order polynomial in the number of parameters (see, e.g., [1, 3]), and it is known that sample complexity in the discriminative setting is linear in the VC dimension [6]. In this paper, we study empirically and theoretically the extent to which these beliefs are true. A parametric family of probabilistic models p(x, y) can be fit either to optimize the joint likelihood of the inputs and the labels, or fit to optimize the conditional likelihood p(ylx), or even fit to minimize the 0-1 training error obtained by thresholding p(ylx) to make predictions.
Quantizing Density Estimators
Meinicke, Peter, Ritter, Helge
We suggest a nonparametric framework for unsupervised learning of projection models in terms of density estimation on quantized sample spaces. The objective is not to optimally reconstruct the data but instead thequantizer is chosen to optimally reconstruct the density of the data. For the resulting quantizing density estimator (QDE) we present a general method for parameter estimation and model selection. We show how projection sets which correspond to traditional unsupervised methods likevector quantization or PCA appear in the new framework. For a principal component quantizer we present results on synthetic and realworld data,which show that the QDE can improve the generalization of the kernel density estimator although its estimate is based on significantly lower-dimensional projection indices of the data.
Minimax Probability Machine
Lanckriet, Gert, Ghaoui, Laurent E., Bhattacharyya, Chiranjib, Jordan, Michael I.
When constructing a classifier, the probability of correct classification offuture data points should be maximized. In the current paper this desideratum is translated in a very direct way into an optimization problem, which is solved using methods from convex optimization.We also show how to exploit Mercer kernels in this setting to obtain nonlinear decision boundaries. A worst-case bound on the probability of misclassification of future data is obtained explicitly. 1 Introduction Consider the problem of choosing a linear discriminant by minimizing the probabilities thatdata vectors fall on the wrong side of the boundary. One way to attempt to achieve this is via a generative approach in which one makes distributional assumptions aboutthe class-conditional densities and thereby estimates and controls the relevant probabilities. The need to make distributional assumptions, however, casts doubt on the generality and validity of such an approach, and in discriminative solutionsto classification problems it is common to attempt to dispense with class-conditional densities entirely.
Online Learning with Kernels
Kivinen, Jyrki, Smola, Alex J., Williamson, Robert C.
We consider online learning in a Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space. Our method is computationally efficient and leads to simple algorithms. In particular we derive update equations for classification, regression, and novelty detection. The inclusion of the -trick allows us to give a robust parameterization.
The Method of Quantum Clustering
We propose a novel clustering method that is an extension of ideas inherent toscale-space clustering and support-vector clustering. Like the latter, itassociates every data point with a vector in Hilbert space, and like the former it puts emphasis on their total sum, that is equal to the scalespace probabilityfunction. The novelty of our approach is the study of an operator in Hilbert space, represented by the Schrรถdinger equation of which the probability function is a solution. This Schrรถdinger equation contains a potential function that can be derived analytically from the probability function.
Kernel Feature Spaces and Nonlinear Blind Souce Separation
Harmeling, Stefan, Ziehe, Andreas, Kawanabe, Motoaki, Mรผller, Klaus-Robert
In kernel based learning the data is mapped to a kernel feature space of a dimension that corresponds to the number of training data points. In practice, however, the data forms a smaller submanifold in feature space, a fact that has been used e.g. by reduced set techniques for SVMs. We propose a new mathematical construction that permits to adapt to the intrinsic dimensionand to find an orthonormal basis of this submanifold. In doing so, computations get much simpler and more important our theoretical framework allows to derive elegant kernelized blind source separation (BSS) algorithms for arbitrary invertible nonlinear mixings. Experiments demonstrate the good performance and high computational efficiency of our kTDSEP algorithm for the problem of nonlinear BSS.
Escaping the Convex Hull with Extrapolated Vector Machines
Maximum margin classifiers such as Support Vector Machines (SVMs) critically depends upon the convex hulls of the training samples of each class, as they implicitly search for the minimum distance between the convex hulls. We propose Extrapolated Vector Machines(XVMs) which rely on extrapolations outside these convex hulls. XVMs improve SVM generalization very significantly on the MNIST [7] OCR data. They share similarities with the Fisher discriminant: maximize the inter-class margin while minimizing theintra-class disparity.
Discriminative Direction for Kernel Classifiers
In many scientific and engineering applications, detecting and understanding differencesbetween two groups of examples can be reduced to a classical problem of training a classifier for labeling new examples while making as few mistakes as possible. In the traditional classification setting,the resulting classifier is rarely analyzed in terms of the properties of the input data captured by the discriminative model. However, suchanalysis is crucial if we want to understand and visualize the detected differences. We propose an approach to interpretation of the statistical modelin the original feature space that allows us to argue about the model in terms of the relevant changes to the input vectors. For each point in the input space, we define a discriminative direction to be the direction that moves the point towards the other class while introducing as little irrelevant change as possible with respect to the classifier function. Wederive the discriminative direction for kernel-based classifiers, demonstrate the technique on several examples and briefly discuss its use in the statistical shape analysis, an application that originally motivated this work.
Product Analysis: Learning to Model Observations as Products of Hidden Variables
Frey, Brendan J., Kannan, Anitha, Jojic, Nebojsa
Factor analysis and principal components analysis can be used to model linear relationships between observed variables and linearly map high-dimensional data to a lower-dimensional hidden space. In factor analysis, the observations are modeled as a linear combination ofnormally distributed hidden variables. We describe a nonlinear generalization of factor analysis, called "product analysis", thatmodels the observed variables as a linear combination of products of normally distributed hidden variables. Just as factor analysiscan be viewed as unsupervised linear regression on unobserved, normally distributed hidden variables, product analysis canbe viewed as unsupervised linear regression on products of unobserved, normally distributed hidden variables. The mapping betweenthe data and the hidden space is nonlinear, so we use an approximate variational technique for inference and learning.
Fast, Large-Scale Transformation-Invariant Clustering
Frey, Brendan J., Jojic, Nebojsa
In previous work on "transformed mixtures of Gaussians" and "transformed hidden Markov models", we showed how the EM algorithm ina discrete latent variable model can be used to jointly normalize data (e.g., center images, pitch-normalize spectrograms) and learn a mixture model of the normalized data. The only input to the algorithm is the data, a list of possible transformations, and the number of clusters to find. The main criticism of this work was that the exhaustive computation of the posterior probabilities overtransformations would make scaling up to large feature vectors and large sets of transformations intractable. Here, we describe howa tremendous speedup is acheived through the use of a variational technique for decoupling transformations, and a fast Fourier transform method for computing posterior probabilities.