For clustering points in Rna main application focus of this paper-one standard approach is based on generative models, in which algorithms such as EM are used to learn a mixture density. These approaches suffer from several drawbacks. First, to use parametric density estimators, harsh simplifying assumptions usually need to be made (e.g., that the density of each cluster is Gaussian). Second, the log likelihood can have many local minima and therefore multiple restarts are required to find a good solution using iterative algorithms. Algorithms such as K-means have similar problems.

Discriminative classifiers model the posterior p(ylx) directly, or learn a direct map from inputs x to the class labels. There are several compelling reasons for using discriminative rather than generative classifiers, one of which, succinctly articulated by Vapnik [6], is that "one should solve the [classification] problem directly and never solve a more general problem as an intermediate step [such as modeling p(xly)]." Indeed, leaving aside computational issues and matters such as handling missing data, the prevailing consensus seems to be that discriminative classifiers are almost always to be preferred to generative ones. Another piece of prevailing folk wisdom is that the number of examples needed to fit a model is often roughly linear in the number of free parameters of a model. This has its theoretical basis in the observation that for "many" models, the VC dimension is roughly linear or at most some low-order polynomial in the number of parameters (see, e.g., [1, 3]), and it is known that sample complexity in the discriminative setting is linear in the VC dimension [6]. In this paper, we study empirically and theoretically the extent to which these beliefs are true. A parametric family of probabilistic models p(x, y) can be fit either to optimize the joint likelihood of the inputs and the labels, or fit to optimize the conditional likelihood p(ylx), or even fit to minimize the 0-1 training error obtained by thresholding p(ylx) to make predictions.

We suggest a nonparametric framework for unsupervised learning of projection models in terms of density estimation on quantized sample spaces. The objective is not to optimally reconstruct the data but instead the quantizer is chosen to optimally reconstruct the density of the data. For the resulting quantizing density estimator (QDE) we present a general method for parameter estimation and model selection. We show how projection sets which correspond to traditional unsupervised methods like vector quantization or PCA appear in the new framework. For a principal component quantizer we present results on synthetic and realworld data, which show that the QDE can improve the generalization of the kernel density estimator although its estimate is based on significantly lower-dimensional projection indices of the data.

One way to attempt to achieve this is via a generative approach in which one makes distributional assumptions about the class-conditional densities and thereby estimates and controls the relevant probabilities. The need to make distributional assumptions, however, casts doubt on the generality and validity of such an approach, and in discriminative solutions to classification problems it is common to attempt to dispense with class-conditional densities entirely. Rather than avoiding any reference to class-conditional densities, it might be useful to attempt to control misclassification probabilities in a worst-case setting; that is, under all possible choices of class-conditional densities. Such a minimax approach could be viewed as providing an alternative justification for discriminative approaches. In this paper we show how such a minimax programme can be carried out in the setting of binary classification. Our approach involves exploiting the following powerful theorem due to Isii [6], as extended in recent work by Bertsimas - http://robotics.eecs.berkeley.edur

We consider online learning in a Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space. Our method is computationally efficient and leads to simple algorithms. In particular we derive update equations for classification, regression, and novelty detection. The inclusion of the -trick allows us to give a robust parameterization.

We propose a novel clustering method that is an extension of ideas inherent to scale-space clustering and support-vector clustering. Like the latter, it associates every data point with a vector in Hilbert space, and like the former it puts emphasis on their total sum, that is equal to the scalespace probability function. The novelty of our approach is the study of an operator in Hilbert space, represented by the Schrödinger equation of which the probability function is a solution. This Schrödinger equation contains a potential function that can be derived analytically from the probability function.

In kernel based learning the data is mapped to a kernel feature space of a dimension that corresponds to the number of training data points. In practice, however, the data forms a smaller submanifold in feature space, a fact that has been used e.g. by reduced set techniques for SVMs. We propose a new mathematical construction that permits to adapt to the intrinsic dimension and to find an orthonormal basis of this submanifold. In doing so, computations get much simpler and more important our theoretical framework allows to derive elegant kernelized blind source separation (BSS) algorithms for arbitrary invertible nonlinear mixings. Experiments demonstrate the good performance and high computational efficiency of our kTDSEP algorithm for the problem of nonlinear BSS.

Maximum margin classifiers such as Support Vector Machines (SVMs) critically depends upon the convex hulls of the training samples of each class, as they implicitly search for the minimum distance between the convex hulls. We propose Extrapolated Vector Machines (XVMs) which rely on extrapolations outside these convex hulls. XVMs improve SVM generalization very significantly on the MNIST [7] OCR data. They share similarities with the Fisher discriminant: maximize the inter-class margin while minimizing the intra-class disparity.

In many scientific and engineering applications, detecting and understanding differences between two groups of examples can be reduced to a classical problem of training a classifier for labeling new examples while making as few mistakes as possible. In the traditional classification setting, the resulting classifier is rarely analyzed in terms of the properties of the input data captured by the discriminative model. However, such analysis is crucial if we want to understand and visualize the detected differences. We propose an approach to interpretation of the statistical model in the original feature space that allows us to argue about the model in terms of the relevant changes to the input vectors. For each point in the input space, we define a discriminative direction to be the direction that moves the point towards the other class while introducing as little irrelevant change as possible with respect to the classifier function. We derive the discriminative direction for kernel-based classifiers, demonstrate the technique on several examples and briefly discuss its use in the statistical shape analysis, an application that originally motivated this work.

Factor analysis and principal components analysis can be used to model linear relationships between observed variables and linearly map high-dimensional data to a lower-dimensional hidden space. In factor analysis, the observations are modeled as a linear combination of normally distributed hidden variables. We describe a nonlinear generalization of factor analysis, called "product analysis", that models the observed variables as a linear combination of products of normally distributed hidden variables. Just as factor analysis can be viewed as unsupervised linear regression on unobserved, normally distributed hidden variables, product analysis can be viewed as unsupervised linear regression on products of unobserved, normally distributed hidden variables. The mapping between the data and the hidden space is nonlinear, so we use an approximate variational technique for inference and learning.