Statistical Learning
Optimistic Semi-supervised Least Squares Classification
Krijthe, Jesse H., Loog, Marco
The goal of semi-supervised learning is to improve supervised classifiers by using additional unlabeled training examples. In this work we study a simple self-learning approach to semi-supervised learning applied to the least squares classifier. We show that a soft-label and a hard-label variant of self-learning can be derived by applying block coordinate descent to two related but slightly different objective functions. The resulting soft-label approach is related to an idea about dealing with missing data that dates back to the 1930s. We show that the soft-label variant typically outperforms the hard-label variant on benchmark datasets and partially explain this behaviour by studying the relative difficulty of finding good local minima for the corresponding objective functions.
Sparse principal component regression for generalized linear models
Kawano, Shuichi, Fujisawa, Hironori, Takada, Toyoyuki, Shiroishi, Toshihiko
Principal component regression (PCR) is a widely used two-stage procedure: principal component analysis (PCA), followed by regression in which the selected principal components are regarded as new explanatory variables in the model. Note that PCA is based only on the explanatory variables, so the principal components are not selected using the information on the response variable. In this paper, we propose a one-stage procedure for PCR in the framework of generalized linear models. The basic loss function is based on a combination of the regression loss and PCA loss. An estimate of the regression parameter is obtained as the minimizer of the basic loss function with a sparse penalty. We call the proposed method sparse principal component regression for generalized linear models (SPCR-glm). Taking the two loss function into consideration simultaneously, SPCR-glm enables us to obtain sparse principal component loadings that are related to a response variable. However, a combination of loss functions may cause a parameter identification problem, but this potential problem is avoided by virtue of the sparse penalty. Thus, the sparse penalty plays two roles in this method. The parameter estimation procedure is proposed using various update algorithms with the coordinate descent algorithm. We apply SPCR-glm to two real datasets, doctor visits data and mouse consomic strain data. SPCR-glm provides more easily interpretable principal component (PC) scores and clearer classification on PC plots than the usual PCA.
The 10 Algorithms Machine Learning Engineers Need to Know
It is no doubt that the sub-field of machine learning / artificial intelligence has increasingly gained more popularity in the past couple of years. As Big Data is the hottest trend in the tech industry at the moment, machine learning is incredibly powerful to make predictions or calculated suggestions based on large amounts of data. Some of the most common examples of machine learning are Netflix's algorithms to make movie suggestions based on movies you have watched in the past or Amazon's algorithms that recommend books based on books you have bought before. So if you want to learn more about machine learning, how do you start? For me, my first introduction is when I took an Artificial Intelligence class when I was studying abroad in Copenhagen. My lecturer is a full-time Applied Math and CS professor at the Technical University of Denmark, in which his research areas are logic and artificial, focusing primarily on the use of logic to model human-like planning, reasoning and problem solving.
Maximum entropy models capture melodic styles
Sakellariou, Jason, Tria, Francesca, Loreto, Vittorio, Pachet, François
We introduce a Maximum Entropy model able to capture the statistics of melodies in music. The model can be used to generate new melodies that emulate the style of the musical corpus which was used to train it. Instead of using the $n-$body interactions of $(n-1)-$order Markov models, traditionally used in automatic music generation, we use a $k-$nearest neighbour model with pairwise interactions only. In that way, we keep the number of parameters low and avoid over-fitting problems typical of Markov models. We show that long-range musical phrases don't need to be explicitly enforced using high-order Markov interactions, but can instead emerge from multiple, competing, pairwise interactions. We validate our Maximum Entropy model by contrasting how much the generated sequences capture the style of the original corpus without plagiarizing it. To this end we use a data-compression approach to discriminate the levels of borrowing and innovation featured by the artificial sequences. The results show that our modelling scheme outperforms both fixed-order and variable-order Markov models. This shows that, despite being based only on pairwise interactions, this Maximum Entropy scheme opens the possibility to generate musically sensible alterations of the original phrases, providing a way to generate innovation.
Recursion-Free Online Multiple Incremental/Decremental Analysis Based on Ridge Support Vector Learning
This study presents a rapid multiple incremental and decremental mechanism based on Weight-Error Curves (WECs) for support-vector analysis. Recursion-free computation is proposed for predicting the Lagrangian multipliers of new samples. This study examines Ridge Support Vector Models, subsequently devising a recursion-free function derived from WECs. With the proposed function, all the new Lagrangian multipliers can be computed at once without using any gradual step sizes. Moreover, such a function relaxes a constraint, where the increment of new multiple Lagrangian multipliers should be the same in the previous work, thereby easily satisfying the requirement of KKT conditions. The proposed mechanism no longer requires typical bookkeeping strategies, which compute the step size by checking all the training samples in each incremental round.
Machine learning applied to single-shot x-ray diagnostics in an XFEL
Sanchez-Gonzalez, A., Micaelli, P., Olivier, C., Barillot, T. R., Ilchen, M., Lutman, A. A., Marinelli, A., Maxwell, T., Achner, A., Agåker, M., Berrah, N., Bostedt, C., Buck, J., Bucksbaum, P. H., Montero, S. Carron, Cooper, B., Cryan, J. P., Dong, M., Feifel, R., Frasinski, L. J., Fukuzawa, H., Galler, A., Hartmann, G., Hartmann, N., Helml, W., Johnson, A. S., Knie, A., Lindahl, A. O., Liu, J., Motomura, K., Mucke, M., O'Grady, C., Rubensson, J-E., Simpson, E. R., Squibb, R. J., Såthe, C., Ueda, K., Vacher, M., Walke, D. J., Zhaunerchyk, V., Coffee, R. N., Marangos, J. P.
X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs) are the only sources currently able to produce bright few-fs pulses with tunable photon energies from 100 eV to more than 10 keV. Due to the stochastic SASE operating principles and other technical issues the output pulses are subject to large fluctuations, making it necessary to characterize the x-ray pulses on every shot for data sorting purposes. We present a technique that applies machine learning tools to predict x-ray pulse properties using simple electron beam and x-ray parameters as input. Using this technique at the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS), we report mean errors below 0.3 eV for the prediction of the photon energy at 530 eV and below 1.6 fs for the prediction of the delay between two x-ray pulses. We also demonstrate spectral shape prediction with a mean agreement of 97%. This approach could potentially be used at the next generation of high-repetition-rate XFELs to provide accurate knowledge of complex x-ray pulses at the full repetition rate.
Gradient Descent - Batch Normalization in Neural Networks
Batch Normalization basically means that we normalize each activation individually. Training Deep Neural Networks is complicated by the fact that the distribution of each layer's inputs changes during training, as the parameters of the previous layers change. This slows down the training by requiring lower learning rates and careful parameter initialization, and makes it notoriously hard to train models with saturating nonlinearities. We refer to this phenomenon as internal covariate shift. Their paper is a fascinting deep dive into the math of how layers are affected by the input, and how this covariate shift can be reduced by applying batch normalizations. Using batch normalization means we can use higher learning rates (since gradients do not explode or vanish), making the network more resilient.
Static & DYNAMICAL Machine Learning – What is the Difference?
In an earlier blog, "Need for DYNAMICAL Machine Learning: Bayesian exact recursive estimation", I introduced the need for Dynamical ML as we now enter the "Walk" stage of "Crawl-Walk-Run" evolution of machine learning. First, I defined Static ML as follows: Given a set of inputs and outputs, find a static map between the two during supervised "Training" and use this static map for business purposes during "Operation". I made the following points using IoT as an example. Dynamical ML solution involves State-Space data model (more below). What more does a Dynamical ML solution offer?
Columbia University Free Online Course on Machine Learning
Columbia University is offering free online course on Machine Learning. It is a subfield of computer science that evolved from the study of pattern recognition and computational learning theory in artificial intelligence. In this course applicants will master the essentials of machine learning and algorithms to help improve learning from data without human intervention. The course will start on January 16, 2017. Columbia University is one of the world's most important centers of research and at the same time a distinctive and distinguished learning environment for undergraduates and graduate students in many scholarly and professional fields.