Statistical Learning
Covariate-assisted spectral clustering
Binkiewicz, Norbert, Vogelstein, Joshua T., Rohe, Karl
Biological and social systems consist of myriad interacting units. The interactions can be represented in the form of a graph or network. Measurements of these graphs can reveal the underlying structure of these interactions, which provides insight into the systems that generated the graphs. Moreover, in applications such as connectomics, social networks, and genomics, graph data are accompanied by contextualizing measures on each node. We utilize these node covariates to help uncover latent communities in a graph, using a modification of spectral clustering. Statistical guarantees are provided under a joint mixture model that we call the node-contextualized stochastic blockmodel, including a bound on the mis-clustering rate. The bound is used to derive conditions for achieving perfect clustering. For most simulated cases, covariate-assisted spectral clustering yields results superior to regularized spectral clustering without node covariates and to an adaptation of canonical correlation analysis. We apply our clustering method to large brain graphs derived from diffusion MRI data, using the node locations or neurological region membership as covariates. In both cases, covariate-assisted spectral clustering yields clusters that are easier to interpret neurologically.
Performance From Various Predictive Models
Introduction: In the first blog, we decided on the predictors. We knew that different predictive models have different assumptions about their predictors. Random Forest has none, but Logistic Regression requires normality of the continuous variables, and assumes the probability between 2 consecutive unit levels in a series of numbers to stay constant. K Nearest Neighbors requires the predictors to be at least on the same scale. SVM, Logistic Regression, and Neural Networks tend to be sensitive to outliers.
24 Uses of Statistical Modeling (Part I)
Here we discuss general applications of statistical models, whether they arise from data science, operations research, engineering, machine learning or statistics. We do not discuss specific algorithms such as decision trees, logistic regression, Bayesian modeling, Markov models, data reduction or feature selection. Instead, I discuss frameworks - each one using its own types of techniques and algorithms - to solve real life problems. Most of the entries below are found in Wikipedia, and I have used a few definitions or extracts from the relevant Wikipedia articles, in addition to personal contributions. Spatial dependency is the co-variation of properties within geographic space: characteristics at proximal locations appear to be correlated, either positively or negatively. Methods for time series analyses may be divided into two classes: frequency-domain methods and time-domain methods.
Property-driven State-Space Coarsening for Continuous Time Markov Chains
Michaelides, Michalis, Milios, Dimitrios, Hillston, Jane, Sanguinetti, Guido
Dynamical systems with large state-spaces are often expensive to thoroughly explore experimentally. Coarse-graining methods aim to define simpler systems which are more amenable to analysis and exploration; most current methods, however, focus on a priori state aggregation based on similarities in transition rates, which is not necessarily reflected in similar behaviours at the level of trajectories. We propose a way to coarsen the state-space of a system which optimally preserves the satisfaction of a set of logical specifications about the system's trajectories. Our approach is based on Gaussian Process emulation and Multi-Dimensional Scaling, a dimensionality reduction technique which optimally preserves distances in non-Euclidean spaces. We show how to obtain low-dimensional visualisations of the system's state-space from the perspective of properties' satisfaction, and how to define macro-states which behave coherently with respect to the specifications. Our approach is illustrated on a non-trivial running example, showing promising performance and high computational efficiency.
Solving Large-scale Systems of Random Quadratic Equations via Stochastic Truncated Amplitude Flow
Wang, Gang, Giannakis, Georgios B., Chen, Jie
A novel approach termed \emph{stochastic truncated amplitude flow} (STAF) is developed to reconstruct an unknown $n$-dimensional real-/complex-valued signal $\bm{x}$ from $m$ `phaseless' quadratic equations of the form $\psi_i=|\langle\bm{a}_i,\bm{x}\rangle|$. This problem, also known as phase retrieval from magnitude-only information, is \emph{NP-hard} in general. Adopting an amplitude-based nonconvex formulation, STAF leads to an iterative solver comprising two stages: s1) Orthogonality-promoting initialization through a stochastic variance reduced gradient algorithm; and, s2) A series of iterative refinements of the initialization using stochastic truncated gradient iterations. Both stages involve a single equation per iteration, thus rendering STAF a simple, scalable, and fast approach amenable to large-scale implementations that is useful when $n$ is large. When $\{\bm{a}_i\}_{i=1}^m$ are independent Gaussian, STAF provably recovers exactly any $\bm{x}\in\mathbb{R}^n$ exponentially fast based on order of $n$ quadratic equations. STAF is also robust in the presence of additive noise of bounded support. Simulated tests involving real Gaussian $\{\bm{a}_i\}$ vectors demonstrate that STAF empirically reconstructs any $\bm{x}\in\mathbb{R}^n$ exactly from about $2.3n$ magnitude-only measurements, outperforming state-of-the-art approaches and narrowing the gap from the information-theoretic number of equations $m=2n-1$. Extensive experiments using synthetic data and real images corroborate markedly improved performance of STAF over existing alternatives.
The 10 Algorithms Machine Learning Engineers Need to Know
It is no doubt that the sub-field of machine learning / artificial intelligence has increasingly gained more popularity in the past couple of years. As Big Data is the hottest trend in the tech industry at the moment, machine learning is incredibly powerful to make predictions or calculated suggestions based on large amounts of data. Some of the most common examples of machine learning are Netflix's algorithms to make movie suggestions based on movies you have watched in the past or Amazon's algorithms that recommend books based on books you have bought before. So if you want to learn more about machine learning, how do you start? For me, my first introduction is when I took an Artificial Intelligence class when I was studying abroad in Copenhagen.
Emotional Artificial Intelligence
Can computer software be designed to be more emotional? Imagine the idea of conversing with your computer, perhaps checking the weather. The weather appears to be cold and rainy for the early part of the day. This naturally brings a certain feeling of negativity, perhaps even dread, to most people. Typical computer programs of today will simply report the weather and prompt for the next query, without giving the user's disposition a single thought.
Cyber Security and Machine Learning
Talking about the relationship between cyber security and machine learning, we need to first identify a concept change. In the past, cyber security focuses on blocking the intruders from outside of our network, but today, we have to believe that intruders are among us. They have invaded our systems and they are doing or going to do damages to us. Whatever the compromised device or machine is doing, it's acting abnormally. So, cyber security means anomaly detection.
Globally Optimal Training of Generalized Polynomial Neural Networks with Nonlinear Spectral Methods
Gautier, Antoine, Nguyen, Quynh, Hein, Matthias
The optimization problem behind neural networks is highly non-convex. Training with stochastic gradient descent and variants requires careful parameter tuning and provides no guarantee to achieve the global optimum. In contrast we show under quite weak assumptions on the data that a particular class of feedforward neural networks can be trained globally optimal with a linear convergence rate with our nonlinear spectral method. Up to our knowledge this is the first practically feasible method which achieves such a guarantee. While the method can in principle be applied to deep networks, we restrict ourselves for simplicity in this paper to one and two hidden layer networks. Our experiments confirm that these models are rich enough to achieve good performance on a series of real-world datasets.
Toward Implicit Sample Noise Modeling: Deviation-driven Matrix Factorization
Lee, Guang-He, Yang, Shao-Wen, Lin, Shou-De
The objective function of a matrix factorization model usually aims to minimize the average of a regression error contributed by each element. However, given the existence of stochastic noises, the implicit deviations of sample data from their true values are almost surely diverse, which makes each data point not equally suitable for fitting a model. In this case, simply averaging the cost among data in the objective function is not ideal. Intuitively we would like to emphasize more on the reliable instances (i.e., those contain smaller noise) while training a model. Motivated by such observation, we derive our formula from a theoretical framework for optimal weighting under heteroscedastic noise distribution. Specifically, by modeling and learning the deviation of data, we design a novel matrix factorization model. Our model has two advantages. First, it jointly learns the deviation and conducts dynamic reweighting of instances, allowing the model to converge to a better solution. Second, during learning the deviated instances are assigned lower weights, which leads to faster convergence since the model does not need to overfit the noise. The experiments are conducted in clean recommendation and noisy sensor datasets to test the effectiveness of the model in various scenarios. The results show that our model outperforms the state-of-the-art factorization and deep learning models in both accuracy and efficiency.