Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Statistical Learning


Co-clustering through Optimal Transport

arXiv.org Machine Learning

In this paper, we present a novel method for co-clustering, an unsupervised learning approach that aims at discovering homogeneous groups of data instances and features by grouping them simultaneously. The proposed method uses the entropy regularized optimal transport between empirical measures defined on data instances and features in order to obtain an estimated joint probability density function represented by the optimal coupling matrix. This matrix is further factorized to obtain the induced row and columns partitions using multiscale representations approach. To justify our method theoretically, we show how the solution of the regularized optimal transport can be seen from the vari-ational inference perspective thus motivating its use for co-clustering. The algorithm derived for the proposed method and its kernelized version based on the notion of Gromov-Wasserstein distance are fast, accurate and can determine automatically the number of both row and column clusters. These features are vividly demonstrated through extensive experimental evaluations.


Sharp Convergence Rates for Forward Regression in High-Dimensional Sparse Linear Models

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Forward regression is a statistical model selection and estimation procedure which inductively selects covariates that add predictive power into a working statistical regression model. Once a model is selected, unknown regression parameters are estimated by least squares. This paper analyzes forward regression in high-dimensional sparse linear models. Probabilistic bounds for prediction error norm and number of selected covariates are proved. The analysis in this paper gives sharp rates and does not require beta-min or irrepresentability conditions.


Kernel Bandwidth Selection for SVDD: Peak Criterion Approach for Large Data

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Support Vector Data Description (SVDD) provides a useful approach to construct a description of multivariate data for single-class classification and outlier detection with various practical applications. Gaussian kernel used in SVDD formulation allows flexible data description defined by observations designated as support vectors. The data boundary of such description is non-spherical and conforms to the geometric features of the data. By varying the Gaussian kernel bandwidth parameter, the SVDD-generated boundary can be made either smoother (more spherical) or tighter/jagged. The former case may lead to under-fitting, whereas the latter may result in overfitting. Peak criterion has been proposed to select an optimal value of the kernel bandwidth to strike the balance between the data boundary smoothness and its ability to capture the general geometric shape of the data. Peak criterion involves training SVDD at various values of the kernel bandwidth parameter. When training datasets are large, the time required to obtain the optimal value of the Gaussian kernel bandwidth parameter according to Peak method can become prohibitively large. This paper proposes an extension of Peak method for the case of large data. The proposed method gives good results when applied to several datasets. Two existing alternative methods of computing the Gaussian kernel bandwidth parameter (Coefficient of Variation and Distance to the Farthest Neighbor) were modified to allow comparison with the proposed method on convergence. Empirical comparison demonstrates the advantage of the proposed method.


Data Science Dictionary

@machinelearnbot

The idea of cross-validation is to split the data into N subsets, to put one subset aside, to estimate parameters of the model from the remaining N-1 subsets, and to use the retained subset to estimate the error of the model. Such a process is repeated N times - with each of the N subsets being used as the validation set . Then the values of the errors obtained in such N steps are combined to provide the final estimate of the model error. The cross-validation is used in various classification and prediction procedures, such as regression analysis, discriminant analysis, neural networks and classification and regression trees (CART) . The goal is to improve the quality of the decision that is made from the outcome of the study on the basis of statistical methods, and to ensure that maximum information is obtained from scarce experimental data.


Understanding the Bias-Variance Tradeoff: An Overview

@machinelearnbot

While this will serve as an overview of Scott's essay, which you can read for further detail and mathematical insights, we will start by with Fortmann-Roe's verbatim definitions which are central to the piece: Error due to Bias: The error due to bias is taken as the difference between the expected (or average) prediction of our model and the correct value which we are trying to predict. Again, imagine you can repeat the entire model building process multiple times. Fortmann-Roe ends the section on over- and under-fitting by pointing to another of his great essays (Accurately Measuring Model Prediction Error), and then moving on to the highly-agreeable recommendation that "resampling based measures such as cross-validation should be preferred over theoretical measures such as Aikake's Information Criteria." I recommend reading Scott Fortmann-Roe's entire bias-variance tradeoff essay, as well as his piece on measuring model prediction error.


ŷhat Intuitive Classification using KNN and Python

@machinelearnbot

K-nearest neighbors, or KNN, is a supervised learning algorithm for either classification or regression. It's super intuitive and has been applied to many types of problems. To make a personalized offer to one customer, you might employ KNN to find similar customers and base your offer on their purchase behaviors. KNN has also been applied to medical diagnosis and credit scoring. This is a post about the K-nearest neighbors algorithm and Python.


Modern Machine Learning Algorithms: Strengths and Weaknesses

#artificialintelligence

In this guide, we'll take a practical, concise tour through modern machine learning algorithms. While other such lists exist, they don't really explain the practical tradeoffs of each algorithm, which we hope to do here. We'll discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each algorithm based on our experience. Categorizing machine learning algorithms is tricky, and there are several reasonable approaches; they can be grouped into generative/discriminative, parametric/non-parametric, supervised/unsupervised, and so on. However, from our experience, this isn't always the most practical way to group algorithms.


Vector Representations of Words TensorFlow

#artificialintelligence

In this tutorial we look at the word2vec model by Mikolov et al. This model is used for learning vector representations of words, called "word embeddings". This tutorial is meant to highlight the interesting, substantive parts of building a word2vec model in TensorFlow. This basic example contains the code needed to download some data, train on it a bit and visualize the result. But first, let's look at why we would want to learn word embeddings in the first place.


Which machine learning algorithm should I use?

#artificialintelligence

The machine learning algorithm cheat sheet helps you to choose from a variety of machine learning algorithms to find the appropriate algorithm for your specific problems. A support vector machine (SVM) training algorithm finds the classifier represented by the normal vector \(w\) and bias \(b\) of the hyperplane. A support vector machine (SVM) training algorithm finds the classifier represented by the normal vector and bias of the hyperplane. Support vector machines (SVM) and other simpler models, which can be easily trained by solving convex optimization problems, gradually replaced neural networks in machine learning.


Discovering the Graph Structure in the Clustering Results

arXiv.org Machine Learning

In a standard cluster analysis, such as k-means, in addition to clusters locations and distances between them, it's important to know if they are connected or well separated from each other. The main focus of this paper is discovering the relations between the resulting clusters. We propose a new method which is based on pairwise overlapping k-means clustering, that in addition to means of clusters provides the graph structure of their relations. The proposed method has a set of parameters that can be tuned in order to control the sensitivity of the model and the desired relative size of the pairwise overlapping interval between means of two adjacent clusters, i.e., level of overlapping. We present the exact formula for calculating that parameter. The empirical study presented in the paper demonstrates that our approach works well not only on toy data but also compliments standard clustering results with a reasonable graph structure on real datasets, such as financial indices and restaurants.