A key phase in the bridge design process is the selection of the structural system. Due to budget and time constraints, engineers typically rely on engineering judgment and prior experience when selecting a structural system, often considering a limited range of design alternatives. The objective of this study was to explore the suitability of supervised machine learning as a preliminary design aid that provides guidance to engineers with regards to the statistically optimal bridge type to choose, ultimately improving the likelihood of optimized design, design standardization, and reduced maintenance costs. In order to devise this supervised learning system, data for over 600,000 bridges from the National Bridge Inventory database were analyzed. Key attributes for determining the bridge structure type were identified through three feature selection techniques. Potentially useful attributes like seismic intensity and historic data on the cost of materials (steel and concrete) were then added from the US Geological Survey (USGS) database and Engineering News Record. Decision tree, Bayes network and Support Vector Machines were used for predicting the bridge design type. Due to state-to-state variations in material availability, material costs, and design codes, supervised learning models based on the complete data set did not yield favorable results. Supervised learning models were then trained and tested using 10-fold cross validation on data for each state. Inclusion of seismic data improved the model performance noticeably. The data was then resampled to reduce the bias of the models towards more common design types, and the supervised learning models thus constructed showed further improvements in performance. The average recall and precision for the state models was 88.6% and 88.0% using Decision Trees, 84.0% and 83.7% using Bayesian Networks, and 80.8% and 75.6% using SVM.

Linear and Logistic regressions are usually the first algorithms people learn in predictive modeling. Due to their popularity, a lot of analysts even end up thinking that they are the only form of regressions. The ones who are slightly more involved think that they are the most important amongst all forms of regression analysis. The truth is that there are innumerable forms of regressions, which can be performed. Each form has its own importance and a specific condition where they are best suited to apply.

Above we can see that two deviances NULL and Residual. Here Value of NULL deviance can be read as 43,86 on 31 degrees of freedom and Residual deviance as 21.4 on 29 degrees of freedom. Deviance is a measure of goodness of fit of a model. Higher numbers always indicates bad fit. The null deviance shows how well the response variable is predicted by a model that includes only the intercept (grand mean) where as residual with inclusion of independent variables.

Dimensionality Reduction is a category of unsupervised machine learning techniques which is used to reduce the number of features or variables of columns in a dataset. Lot of variables often enhances the noise signal in the data which is bad for modelling but Dimensionality Reduction techniques can help in this. One of the Dimensionality Reduction Technique is Principal component Analysis which creates a new feature set which are uncorrelated or orthogonal .The newly created features are called Principal components.First principal component explains the most of the variance in the data and then the next principal component explains the remaining. Principal Component analysis is helpful for any dataset which has many variables or variables which are anonymous. Principal component analysis can help in explaining the structure of the dataset or creating the groups in the data or doing the predictive analytics .

Every machine learning project begins by understanding what the data and drawing the objectives. While applying machine learning algorithms to your data set, you are understanding, building and analyzing the data as to get the end result. To understand various machine learning algorithms let us use the Iris data set, one of the most famous datasets available. This data set consists of the physical parameters of three species of flower -- Versicolor, Setosa and Virginica. The numeric parameters which the dataset contains are Sepal width, Sepal length, Petal width and Petal length.

Many articles have been written about the top machine learning algorithms: click here and here for instance. Most of them seem to define top as oldest, and thus most used, ignoring modern, efficient algorithms fit for big data, such as indexation, attribution modeling, collaborative filtering, or recommendation engines used by companies such as Amazon, Google, or Facebook. I received this morning and advertisement for a (self-published) book called Master Machine Learning Algorithms, and I could not resist to post the author's list of top 10 machine learning algorithms:: You can check the book here. Some of these techniques such as Naive Bayes (variables are almost never uncorrelated), Linear Discriminant Analysis (clusters are almost never separated by hyperplanes), or Linear Regression (numerous model assumptions - including linearity - are almost always violated in real data) have been so abused that I would hesitate teaching them. This is not a criticism of the book; most textbooks mention pretty much the same algorithms, and in this case, even skipping all graph-related algorithms.

Clustering is a Machine Learning technique that involves the grouping of data points. Given a set of data points, we can use a clustering algorithm to classify each data point into a specific group. In theory, data points that are in the same group should have similar properties and/or features, while data points in different groups should have highly dissimilar properties and/or features. Clustering is a method of unsupervised learning and is a common technique for statistical data analysis used in many fields. In Data Science, we can use clustering analysis to gain some valuable insights from our data by seeing what groups the data points fall into when we apply a clustering algorithm.

We consider the problem of improving kernel approximation via randomized feature maps. These maps arise as Monte Carlo approximation to integral representations of kernel functions and scale up kernel methods for larger datasets. We propose to use more efficient numerical integration technique to obtain better estimates of the integrals compared to the state-of-the-art methods. Our approach allows the use of information about the integrand to enhance approximation and facilitates fast computations. We derive the convergence behavior and conduct an extensive empirical study that supports our hypothesis.

Networks observed in the real world like social networks, collaboration networks etc., exhibit temporal dynamics, i.e. nodes and edges appear and/or disappear over time. In this paper, we propose a generative, latent space based, statistical model for such networks (called dynamic networks). We consider the case where the number of nodes is fixed, but the presence of edges can vary over time. Our model allows the number of communities in the network to be different at different time steps. We use a neural network based methodology to perform approximate inference in the proposed model and its simplified version. Experiments done on synthetic and real-world networks for the task of community detection and link prediction demonstrate the utility and effectiveness of our model as compared to other similar existing approaches. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that integrates statistical modeling of dynamic networks with deep learning for community detection and link prediction.

Reducing labeling costs in supervised learning is a critical issue in many practical machine learning applications. In this paper, we consider positive-confidence (Pconf) classification, the problem of training a binary classifier only from positive data equipped with confidence. Pconf classification can be regarded as a discriminative extension of one-class classification (which is aimed at "describing" the positive class by clustering-related methods), with ability to tune hyper-parameters for "classifying" positive and negative samples. Pconf classification is also related to positive-unlabeled (PU) classification (which uses hard-labeled positive data and unlabeled data), but the difference is that it enables us to avoid estimating the class priors, which is a critical bottleneck in typical PU classification methods. For the Pconf classification problem, we provide a simple empirical risk minimization framework and give a formulation for linear-in-parameter models that can be implemented easily and computationally efficiently. We also theoretically establish the consistency and estimation error bound for Pconf classification, and demonstrate the practical usefulness of the proposed method for deep neural networks through experiments.