Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Statistical Learning


Listing Embeddings for Similar Listing Recommendations and Real-time Personalization in Search

#artificialintelligence

Airbnb's marketplace contains millions of diverse listings which potential guests explore through search results generated from a sophisticated Machine Learning model that uses more than hundred signals to decide how to rank a particular listing on the search page. Once a guest views a home they can continue their search by either returning to the results or by browsing the Similar Listing Carousel, where listing recommendations related to the current listing are shown. In this blog post we describe a Listing Embedding technique we developed and deployed at Airbnb for the purpose of improving Similar Listing Recommendations and Real-Time Personalization in Search Ranking. The embeddings are vector representations of Airbnb homes learned from search sessions that allow us to measure similarities between listings. They effectively encode many listing features, such as location, price, listing type, architecture and listing style, all using only 32 float numbers.


Online Regression with Model Selection

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Online learning algorithms have a wide variety of applications in large scale machine learning problems due to their low computational and memory requirements. However, standard online learning methods still suffer some issues such as lower convergence rates and limited capability to select features or to recover the true features. In this paper, we present a novel framework for online learning based on running averages and introduce a series of online versions of some popular existing offline algorithms such as Adaptive Lasso, Elastic Net and Feature Selection with Annealing. We prove the equivalence between our online methods and their offline counterparts and give theoretical feature selection and convergence guarantees for some of them. In contrast to the existing online methods, the proposed methods can extract model with any desired sparsity level at any time. Numerical experiments indicate that our new methods enjoy high feature selection accuracy and a fast convergence rate, compared with standard stochastic algorithms and offline learning algorithms. We also present some applications to large datasets where again the proposed framework shows competitive results compared to popular online and offline algorithms.


Collaborative targeted minimum loss inference from continuously indexed nuisance parameter estimators

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Suppose that we wish to infer the value of a statistical parameter at a law from which we sample independent observations. Suppose that this parameter is smooth and that we can define two variation-independent, infinite-dimensional features of the law, its so called Q- and G-components (comp.), such that if we estimate them consistently at a fast enough product of rates, then we can build a confidence interval (CI) with a given asymptotic level based on a plain targeted minimum loss estimator (TMLE). The estimators of the Q- and G-comp. would typically be by products of machine learning algorithms. We focus on the case that the machine learning algorithm for the G-comp. is fine-tuned by a real-valued parameter h. Then, a plain TMLE with an h chosen by cross-validation would typically not lend itself to the construction of a CI, because the selection of h would trade-off its empirical bias with something akin to the empirical variance of the estimator of the G-comp. as opposed to that of the TMLE. A collaborative TMLE (C-TMLE) might, however, succeed in achieving the relevant trade-off. We construct a C-TMLE and show that, under high-level empirical processes conditions, and if there exists an oracle h that makes a bulky remainder term asymptotically Gaussian, then the C-TMLE is asymptotically Gaussian hence amenable to building a CI provided that its asymptotic variance can be estimated too. We illustrate the construction and main result with the inference of the average treatment effect, where the Q-comp. consists in a marginal law and a conditional expectation, and the G-comp. is a propensity score (a conditional probability). We also conduct a multi-faceted simulation study to investigate the empirical properties of the collaborative TMLE when the G-comp. is estimated by the LASSO. Here, h is the bound on the l1-norm of the candidate coefficients.


Mode-Seeking Clustering and Density Ridge Estimation via Direct Estimation of Density-Derivative-Ratios

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Modes and ridges of the probability density function behind observed data are useful geometric features. Mode-seeking clustering assigns cluster labels by associating data samples with the nearest modes, and estimation of density ridges enables us to find lower-dimensional structures hidden in data. A key technical challenge both in mode-seeking clustering and density ridge estimation is accurate estimation of the ratios of the first- and second-order density derivatives to the density. A naive approach takes a three-step approach of first estimating the data density, then computing its derivatives, and finally taking their ratios. However, this three-step approach can be unreliable because a good density estimator does not necessarily mean a good density derivative estimator, and division by the estimated density could significantly magnify the estimation error. To cope with these problems, we propose a novel estimator for the \emph{density-derivative-ratios}. The proposed estimator does not involve density estimation, but rather \emph{directly} approximates the ratios of density derivatives of any order. Moreover, we establish a convergence rate of the proposed estimator. Based on the proposed estimator, novel methods both for mode-seeking clustering and density ridge estimation are developed, and the respective convergence rates to the mode and ridge of the underlying density are also established. Finally, we experimentally demonstrate that the developed methods significantly outperform existing methods, particularly for relatively high-dimensional data.


Engineering a Simplified 0-Bit Consistent Weighted Sampling

arXiv.org Machine Learning

The Min-Hashing approach to sketching has become an important tool in data analysis, search, and classification. To apply it to real-valued datasets, the ICWS algorithm has become a seminal approach that is widely used, and provides state-of-the-art performance for this problem space. However, ICWS suffers a computational burden as the sketch size K increases. We develop a new Simplified approach to the ICWS algorithm, that enables us to obtain over 20x speedups compared to the standard algorithm. The veracity of our approach is demonstrated empirically on multiple datasets, showing that our new Simplified CWS obtains the same quality of results while being an order of magnitude faster.


Minimax Estimation of Quadratic Fourier Functionals

arXiv.org Machine Learning

We study estimation of (semi-)inner products between two nonparametric probability distributions, given IID samples from each distribution. These products include relatively well-studied classical $\mathcal{L}^2$ and Sobolev inner products, as well as those induced by translation-invariant reproducing kernels, for which we believe our results are the first. We first propose estimators for these quantities, and the induced (semi)norms and (pseudo)metrics. We then prove non-asymptotic upper bounds on their mean squared error, in terms of weights both of the inner product and of the two distributions, in the Fourier basis. Finally, we prove minimax lower bounds that imply rate-optimality of the proposed estimators over Fourier ellipsoids.


On the Resistance of Neural Nets to Label Noise

arXiv.org Machine Learning

We investigate the behavior of convolutional neural networks (CNN) in the presence of label noise. We show empirically that CNN prediction for a given test sample depends on the labels of the training samples in its local neighborhood. This is similar to the way that the K-nearest neighbors (K-NN) classifier works. With this understanding, we derive an analytical expression for the expected accuracy of a K-NN, and hence a CNN, classifier for any level of noise. In particular, we show that K-NN, and CNN, are resistant to label noise that is randomly spread across the training set, but are very sensitive to label noise that is concentrated. Experiments on real datasets validate our analytical expression by showing that they match the empirical results for varying degrees of label noise.


Learning to generate classifiers

arXiv.org Machine Learning

We train a network to generate mappings between training sets and classification policies (a 'classifier generator') by conditioning on the entire training set via an attentional mechanism. The network is directly optimized for test set performance on an training set of related tasks, which is then transferred to unseen 'test' tasks. We use this to optimize for performance in the low-data and unsupervised learning regimes, and obtain significantly better performance in the 10-50 datapoint regime than support vector classifiers, random forests, XGBoost, and k-nearest neighbors on a range of small datasets.


Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labels

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Deep neural networks (DNNs) trained on large-scale datasets have exhibited significant performance in image classification. Many large-scale datasets are collected from websites, however they tend to contain inaccurate labels that are termed as noisy labels. Training on such noisy labeled datasets causes performance degradation because DNNs easily overfit to noisy labels. To overcome this problem, we propose a joint optimization framework of learning DNN parameters and estimating true labels. Our framework can correct labels during training by alternating update of network parameters and labels. We conduct experiments on the noisy CIFAR-10 datasets and the Clothing1M dataset. The results indicate that our approach significantly outperforms other state-of-the-art methods.


KDnuggets News 18:n13, Mar 28: Where did you apply Data Science/ML? 12 Essential Command Line Tools for Data Scientists

#artificialintelligence

Top Stories, Mar 19-25: 5 Things You Need to Know about Sentiment Analysis and Classification; Top 12 Essential Command Line Tools for Data Scientists Top KDnuggets tweets, Mar 14-20: Introduction to Markov Chains "What are Markov chains, when to use them, and how they work"