Vertex classification is vulnerable to perturbations of both graph topology and vertex attributes, as shown in recent research. As in other machine learning domains, concerns about robustness to adversarial manipulation can prevent potential users from adopting proposed methods when the consequence of action is very high. This paper considers two topological characteristics of graphs and explores the way these features affect the amount the adversary must perturb the graph in order to be successful. We show that, if certain vertices are included in the training set, it is possible to substantially an adversary's required perturbation budget. On four citation datasets, we demonstrate that if the training set includes high degree vertices or vertices that ensure all unlabeled nodes have neighbors in the training set, we show that the adversary's budget often increases by a substantial factor---often a factor of 2 or more---over random training for the Nettack poisoning attack. Even for especially easy targets (those that are misclassified after just one or two perturbations), the degradation of performance is much slower, assigning much lower probabilities to the incorrect classes. In addition, we demonstrate that this robustness either persists when recently proposed defenses are applied, or is competitive with the resulting performance improvement for the defender.

Due to the massive size of the neural network models and training datasets used in machine learning today, it is imperative to distribute stochastic gradient descent (SGD) by splitting up tasks such as gradient evaluation across multiple worker nodes. However, running distributed SGD can be prohibitively expensive because it may require specialized computing resources such as GPUs for extended periods of time. We propose cost-effective strategies to exploit volatile cloud instances that are cheaper than standard instances, but may be interrupted by higher priority workloads. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to quantify how variations in the number of active worker nodes (as a result of preemption) affects SGD convergence and the time to train the model. By understanding these trade-offs between preemption probability of the instances, accuracy, and training time, we are able to derive practical strategies for configuring distributed SGD jobs on volatile instances such as Amazon EC2 spot instances and other preemptible cloud instances. Experimental results show that our strategies achieve good training performance at substantially lower cost.

Deep domain adaptation models learn a neural network in an unlabeled target domain by leveraging the knowledge from a labeled source domain. This can be achieved by learning a domain-invariant feature space. Though the learned representations are separable in the source domain, they usually have a large variance and samples with different class labels tend to overlap in the target domain, which yields suboptimal adaptation performance. To fill the gap, a Fisher loss is proposed to learn discriminative representations which are within-class compact and between-class separable. Experimental results on two benchmark datasets show that the Fisher loss is a general and effective loss for deep domain adaptation. Noticeable improvements are brought when it is used together with widely adopted transfer criteria, including MMD, CORAL and domain adversarial loss. For example, an absolute improvement of 6.67% in terms of the mean accuracy is attained when the Fisher loss is used together with the domain adversarial loss on the Office-Home dataset.

The ability to understand and trust the fairness of model predictions, particularly when considering the outcomes of unprivileged groups, is critical to the deployment and adoption of machine learning systems. SHAP values provide a unified framework for interpreting model predictions and feature attribution but do not address the problem of fairness directly. In this work, we propose a new definition of fairness that emphasises the role of an external auditor and model explicability. To satisfy this definition, we develop a framework for mitigating model bias using regularizations constructed from the SHAP values of an adversarial surrogate model. We focus on the binary classification task with a single unprivileged group and link our fairness explicability constraints to classical statistical fairness metrics. We demonstrate our approaches using gradient and adaptive boosting on: a synthetic dataset, the UCI Adult (Census) dataset and a real-world credit scoring dataset. The models produced were fairer and performant.

In our previous chapters, we mainly discussed about the Linear Regression model where the target variable to be predicted is continous in nature and there is a linear relationship between the independent and target varables. But how to predict a discrete varaible based uopn the predictors which are linearly related with the target. In this case Logistic Regression comes to rescue. In this article, we will mainly focus on this predictive model and know the inner engineering of this model. So, What is Logistic Regression?

Right now, we utilize different data science algorithms to solve the task needing to be done. There are many algorithms out there, so it tends to be quite overpowering for beginners. Today, we will quickly present the top 5 mainstream Machine Learning algorithms so you can get settled with the energizing universe of Data Science! Linear Regression is likely the most famous ML algorithm. It finds a line that best fits a dissipated data points on a graph.

Least mean squares (LMS) is a particular case of the backpropagation (BP) algorithm applied to single-layer neural networks with the mean squared error (MSE) loss. One drawback of the LMS is that the instantaneous weight update is proportional to the square of the norm of the input vector. Normalized least mean squares (NLMS) algorithm amends this drawback by dividing the weight changes by the square of the norm of the input vector. The affine projection algorithm (APA) improved the NLMS algorithm to weight update over a batch of recently seen samples. However, the application of NLMS and APA had been limited to single-layer networks and adaptive filters. In this paper, we consider a virtual target for each neuron of a multi-layer neural network and show that the BP algorithm is equivalent to training the weights of each layer using these virtual targets and the LMS algorithm. We also introduce a consequentialism interpretation of the NLMS and the APA algorithms that justifies their use in multi-layer neural networks. Given any optimization algorithm based on the BP over mini-batches, we propose a novel consequentialism method for updating the weights.Consequently, our proposed weight update can be applied both to plain stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and to momentum methods like RMSProp, Adam, and NAG. These ideas helped us to update the weights more carefully in such a way that minimization of the loss for one sample of the mini-batch does not interfere with other samples in that mini-batch. Our experiments show the usefulness of the proposed method in optimizing deep neural network architectures.

We propose a process model for the development of machine learning applications. It guides machine learning practitioners and project organizations from industry and academia with a checklist of tasks that spans the complete project life-cycle, ranging from the very first idea to the continuous maintenance of any machine learning application. With each task, we propose quality assurance methodology that is drawn from practical experience and scientific literature and that has proven to be general and stable enough to include them in best practices. We expand on CRISP-DM, a data mining process model that enjoys strong industry support but lacks to address machine learning specific tasks.

A crime is a punishable offence that is harmful for an individual and his society. It is obvious to comprehend the patterns of criminal activity to prevent them. Research can help society to prevent and solve crime activates. Study shows that only 10 percent offenders commits 50 percent of the total offences. The enforcement team can respond faster if they have early information and pre-knowledge about crime activities of the different points of a city. In this paper, supervised learning technique is used to predict crimes with better accuracy. The proposed system predicts crimes by analyzing data-set that contains records of previously committed crimes and their patterns. The system stands on two main algorithms - i) decision tree, and ii) k-nearest neighbor. Random Forest algorithm and Adaboost are used to increase the accuracy of the prediction. Finally, oversampling is used for better accuracy. The proposed system is feed with a criminal-activity data set of twelve years of San Francisco city.

Gaussian Processes (GPs) provide a powerful probabilistic framework for interpolation, forecasting, and smoothing, but have been hampered by computational scaling issues. Here we prove that for data sampled on one dimension (e.g., a time series sampled at arbitrarily-spaced intervals), approximate GP inference at any desired level of accuracy requires computational effort that scales linearly with the number of observations; this new theorem enables inference on much larger datasets than was previously feasible. To achieve this improved scaling we propose a new family of stationary covariance kernels: the Latent Exponentially Generated (LEG) family, which admits a convenient stable state-space representation that allows linear-time inference. We prove that any continuous integrable stationary kernel can be approximated arbitrarily well by some member of the LEG family. The proof draws connections to Spectral Mixture Kernels, providing new insight about the flexibility of this popular family of kernels. We propose parallelized algorithms for performing inference and learning in the LEG model, test the algorithm on real and synthetic data, and demonstrate scaling to datasets with billions of samples.