Conversational systems are of primary interest in the AI community. Chatbots are increasingly being deployed to provide round-the-clock support and to increase customer engagement. Many of the commercial bot building frameworks follow a standard approach that requires one to build and train an intent model to recognize a user input. Intent models are trained in a supervised setting with a collection of textual utterance and intent label pairs. Gathering a substantial and wide coverage of training data for different intent is a bottleneck in the bot building process. Moreover, the cost of labeling a hundred to thousands of conversations with intent is a time consuming and laborious job. In this paper, we present an intent discovery framework that involves 4 primary steps: Extraction of textual utterances from a conversation using a pre-trained domain agnostic Dialog Act Classifier (Data Extraction), automatic clustering of similar user utterances (Clustering), manual annotation of clusters with an intent label (Labeling) and propagation of intent labels to the utterances from the previous step, which are not mapped to any cluster (Label Propagation); to generate intent training data from raw conversations. We have introduced a novel density-based clustering algorithm ITER-DBSCAN for unbalanced data clustering. Subject Matter Expert (Annotators with domain expertise) manually looks into the clustered user utterances and provides an intent label for discovery. We conducted user studies to validate the effectiveness of the trained intent model generated in terms of coverage of intents, accuracy and time saving concerning manual annotation. Although the system is developed for building an intent model for the conversational system, this framework can also be used for a short text clustering or as a labeling framework.

Backing up the model The model stays on the device, which is great. They will lose the new version of the model unless we take care of that by sending it somewhere and later downloading it. Adding a new version of the model If the model stays and retrains on a device, what if we want to change it for a new model, let's say an improved one (not personalized)? If we do that, the user will also lose all the personalized parts of the model and will need to start from scratch. Usually we support those earlier versions too.

Linear Algebra and Optimization for Machine Learning: A Textbook (Springer), authored by Charu C. Aggarwal, May 2020. PDF Download Link (Free for computers connected to subscribing institutions only). The PDF version has links for e-readers, and is preferable in terms of equation formatting to the Kindle version. A frequent challenge faced by beginners in machine learning is the extensive background requirement in linear algebra and optimization. This makes the learning curve very steep.

Deep clustering (DC) has become the state-of-the-art for unsupervised clustering. In principle, DC represents a variety of unsupervised methods that jointly learn the underlying clusters and the latent representation directly from unstructured datasets. However, DC methods are generally poorly applied due to high operational costs, low scalability, and unstable results. In this paper, we first evaluate several popular DC variants in the context of industrial applicability using eight empirical criteria. We then choose to focus on variational deep clustering (VDC) methods, since they mostly meet those criteria except for simplicity, scalability, and stability. To address these three unmet criteria, we introduce four generic algorithmic improvements: initial $\gamma$-training, periodic $\beta$-annealing, mini-batch GMM (Gaussian mixture model) initialization, and inverse min-max transform. We also propose a novel clustering algorithm S3VDC (simple, scalable, and stable VDC) that incorporates all those improvements. Our experiments show that S3VDC outperforms the state-of-the-art on both benchmark tasks and a large unstructured industrial dataset without any ground truth label. In addition, we analytically evaluate the usability and interpretability of S3VDC.

Achieving the Bayes optimal binary classification rule subject to group fairness constraints is known to be reducible, in some cases, to learning a group-wise thresholding rule over the Bayes regressor. In this paper, we extend this result by proving that, in a broader setting, the Bayes optimal fair learning rule remains a group-wise thresholding rule over the Bayes regressor but with a (possible) randomization at the thresholds. This provides a stronger justification to the post-processing approach in fair classification, in which (1) a predictor is learned first, after which (2) its output is adjusted to remove bias. We show how the post-processing rule in this two-stage approach can be learned quite efficiently by solving an unconstrained optimization problem. The proposed algorithm can be applied to any black-box machine learning model, such as deep neural networks, random forests and support vector machines. In addition, it can accommodate many fairness criteria that have been previously proposed in the literature, such as equalized odds and statistical parity. We prove that the algorithm is Bayes consistent and motivate it, furthermore, via an impossibility result that quantifies the tradeoff between accuracy and fairness across multiple demographic groups. Finally, we conclude by validating the algorithm on the Adult benchmark dataset.

Few-shot meta-learning has been recently reviving with expectations to mimic humanity's fast adaption to new concepts based on prior knowledge. In this short communication, we give a concise review on recent representative methods in few-shot meta-learning, which are categorized into four branches according to their technical characteristics. We conclude this review with some vital current challenges and future prospects in few-shot meta-learning.

Recent studies of cancer somatic mutation profiles seek to identify mutations for targeted therapy in personalized medicine. Analysis of profiles, however, is not trivial, as each profile is heterogeneous and there are multiple confounding factors that influence the cause-and-effect relationships between cancer genes such as cancer (sub)type, biological processes, total number of mutations, and non-linear mutation interactions. Moreover, cancer is biologically redundant, i.e., distinct mutations can result in the alteration of similar biological processes, so it is important to identify all possible combinatorial sets of mutations for effective patient treatment. To model this phenomena, we propose the correlated zero-inflated negative binomial process to infer the inherent structure of somatic mutation profiles through latent representations. This stochastic process takes into account different, yet correlated, co-occurring mutations using profile-specific negative binomial dispersion parameters that are mixed with a correlated beta-Bernoulli process and a probability parameter to model profile heterogeneity. These model parameters are inferred by iterative optimization via amortized and stochastic variational inference using the Pan Cancer dataset from The Cancer Genomic Archive (TCGA). By examining the the latent space, we identify biologically relevant correlations between somatic mutations.

You're looking for a complete Linear Regression course that teaches you everything you need to create a Linear Regression model in Python, right? You've found the right Linear Regression course! Identify the business problem which can be solved using linear regression technique of Machine Learning. Create a linear regression model in Python and analyze its result. A Verifiable Certificate of Completion is presented to all students who undertake this Machine learning basics course.

We use machine learning methods to examine the power of Treasury term spreads and other financial market and macroeconomic variables to forecast US recessions, vis-à-vis probit regression. In particular we propose a novel strategy for conducting cross-validation on classifiers trained with macro/financial panel data of low frequency and compare the results to those obtained from standard k-folds cross-validation. Consistent with the existing literature we find that, in the time series setting, forecast accuracy estimates derived from k-folds are biased optimistically, and cross-validation strategies which eliminate data "peeking" produce lower, and perhaps more realistic, estimates of forecast accuracy. That is, while a k-folds cross-validation indicates tha t the forecast accuracy of tree methods dominates that of neural networks, which in turn dominates that of probit regression, the more conservative cross-validation strategy we propose indicates the exact opposite, and that probit regression should be preferred over machine learning methods, at least in the context of the present problem. This latter result stands in contrast to a growing body of literature demonstrating that machine learning methods outperform many alternative classification algorithms and we discuss some possible reasons for our result.

First of all, I need to import the following libraries. Then I will read the data into a pandas Dataframe. The original dataset contains 81 columns, but for the purposes of this tutorial, I will work with a subset of 12 columns. Details about the columns can be found in the provided link to the dataset. Please note that each row of the table represents a specific house (or observation).