In the Tensor PCA problem introduced by Richard and Montanari (2014), one is given a dataset consisting of $n$ samples $\mathbf{T}_{1:n}$ of i.i.d. Gaussian tensors of order $k$ with the promise that $\mathbb{E}\mathbf{T}_1$ is a rank-1 tensor and $\|\mathbb{E} \mathbf{T}_1\| = 1$. The goal is to estimate $\mathbb{E} \mathbf{T}_1$. This problem exhibits a large conjectured hard phase when $k>2$: When $d \lesssim n \ll d^{\frac{k}{2}}$ it is information theoretically possible to estimate $\mathbb{E} \mathbf{T}_1$, but no polynomial time estimator is known. We provide a sharp analysis of the optimal sample complexity in the Statistical Query (SQ) model and show that SQ algorithms with polynomial query complexity not only fail to solve Tensor PCA in the conjectured hard phase, but also have a strictly sub-optimal sample complexity compared to some polynomial time estimators such as the Richard-Montanari spectral estimator. Our analysis reveals that the optimal sample complexity in the SQ model depends on whether $\mathbb{E} \mathbf{T}_1$ is symmetric or not. For symmetric, even order tensors, we also isolate a sample size regime in which it is possible to test if $\mathbb{E} \mathbf{T}_1 = \mathbf{0}$ or $\mathbb{E}\mathbf{T}_1 \neq \mathbf{0}$ with polynomially many queries but not estimate $\mathbb{E}\mathbf{T}_1$. Our proofs rely on the Fourier analytic approach of Feldman, Perkins and Vempala (2018) to prove sharp SQ lower bounds.

The data made available for analysis are becoming more and more complex along several directions: high dimensionality, number of examples and the amount of labels per example. This poses a variety of challenges for the existing machine learning methods: coping with dataset with a large number of examples that are described in a high-dimensional space and not all examples have labels provided. For example, when investigating the toxicity of chemical compounds there are a lot of compounds available, that can be described with information rich high-dimensional representations, but not all of the compounds have information on their toxicity. To address these challenges, we propose semi-supervised learning of feature ranking. The feature rankings are learned in the context of classification and regression as well as in the context of structured output prediction (multi-label classification, hierarchical multi-label classification and multi-target regression). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that treats the task of feature ranking within the semi-supervised structured output prediction context. More specifically, we propose two approaches that are based on tree ensembles and the Relief family of algorithms. The extensive evaluation across 38 benchmark datasets reveals the following: Random Forests perform the best for the classification-like tasks, while for the regression-like tasks Extra-PCTs perform the best, Random Forests are the most efficient method considering induction times across all tasks, and semi-supervised feature rankings outperform their supervised counterpart across a majority of the datasets from the different tasks.

Machine learning can provide deep insights into data, allowing machines to make high-quality predictions and having been widely used in real-world applications, such as text mining, visual classification, and recommender systems. However, most sophisticated machine learning approaches suffer from huge time costs when operating on large-scale data. This issue calls for the need of {Large-scale Machine Learning} (LML), which aims to learn patterns from big data with comparable performance efficiently. In this paper, we offer a systematic survey on existing LML methods to provide a blueprint for the future developments of this area. We first divide these LML methods according to the ways of improving the scalability: 1) model simplification on computational complexities, 2) optimization approximation on computational efficiency, and 3) computation parallelism on computational capabilities. Then we categorize the methods in each perspective according to their targeted scenarios and introduce representative methods in line with intrinsic strategies. Lastly, we analyze their limitations and discuss potential directions as well as open issues that are promising to address in the future.

Data dimensionality informs us about data complexity and sets limit on the structure of successful signal processing pipelines. In this work we revisit and improve the manifold-adaptive Farahmand-Szepesv\'ari-Audibert (FSA) dimension estimator, making it one of the best nearest neighbor-based dimension estimators available. We compute the probability density function of local FSA estimates, if the local manifold density is uniform. Based on the probability density function, we propose to use the median of local estimates as a basic global measure of intrinsic dimensionality, and we demonstrate the advantages of this asymptotically unbiased estimator over the previously proposed statistics: the mode and the mean. Additionally, from the probability density function, we derive the maximum likelihood formula for global intrinsic dimensionality, if i.i.d. holds. We tackle edge and finite-sample effects with an exponential correction formula, calibrated on hypercube datasets. We compare the performance of the corrected-median-FSA estimator with kNN estimators: maximum likelihood (ML, Levina-Bickel) and two implementations of DANCo (R and matlab). We show that corrected-median-FSA estimator beats the ML estimator and it is on equal footing with DANCo for standard synthetic benchmarks according to mean percentage error and error rate metrics. With the median-FSA algorithm, we reveal diverse changes in the neural dynamics while resting state and during epileptic seizures. We identify brain areas with lower-dimensional dynamics that are possible causal sources and candidates for being seizure onset zones.

Forecasting groups of time series is of increasing practical importance, e.g. forecasting the demand for multiple products offered by a retailer or server loads within a data center. The local approach to this problem considers each time series separately and fits a function or model to each series. The global approach fits a single function to all series. For groups of similar time series, global methods outperform the more established local methods. However, recent results show good performance of global models even in heterogeneous datasets. This suggests a more general applicability of global methods, potentially leading to more accurate tools and new scenarios to study. Formalizing the setting of forecasting a set of time series with local and global methods, we provide the following contributions: 1) Global methods are not more restrictive than local methods, both can produce the same forecasts without any assumptions about similarity of the series. Global models can succeed in a wider range of problems than previously thought. 2) Basic generalization bounds for local and global algorithms. The complexity of local methods grows with the size of the set while it remains constant for global methods. In large datasets, a global algorithm can afford to be quite complex and still benefit from better generalization. These bounds serve to clarify and support recent experimental results in the field, and guide the design of new algorithms. For the class of autoregressive models, this implies that global models can have much larger memory than local methods. 3) In an extensive empirical study, purposely naive algorithms derived from these principles, such as global linear models or deep networks result in superior accuracy. In particular, global linear models can provide competitive accuracy with two orders of magnitude fewer parameters than local methods.

Contrastive learning and supervised learning have both seen significant progress and success. However, thus far they have largely been treated as two separate objectives, brought together only by having a shared neural network. In this paper we show that through the perspective of hybrid discriminative-generative training of energy-based models we can make a direct connection between contrastive learning and supervised learning. Beyond presenting this unified view, we show our specific choice of approximation of the energy-based loss outperforms the existing practice in terms of classification accuracy of WideResNet on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100. It also leads to improved performance on robustness, out-of-distribution detection, and calibration.

We study differentially private (DP) algorithms for stochastic non-convex optimization. In this problem, the goal is to minimize the population loss over a $p$-dimensional space given $n$ i.i.d. samples drawn from a distribution. We improve upon the population gradient bound of ${\sqrt{p}}/{\sqrt{n}}$ from prior work and obtain a sharper rate of $\sqrt[4]{p}/\sqrt{n}$. We obtain this rate by providing the first analyses on a collection of private gradient-based methods, including adaptive algorithms DP RMSProp and DP Adam. Our proof technique leverages the connection between differential privacy and adaptive data analysis to bound gradient estimation error at every iterate, which circumvents the worse generalization bound from the standard uniform convergence argument. Finally, we evaluate the proposed algorithms on two popular deep learning tasks and demonstrate the empirical advantages of DP adaptive gradient methods over standard DP SGD.

The support vector machine is base on the idea of finding the best line or hyperplane that distinctly classifies the data point. SVM can find the best hyperplane in N- dimensions. Here N is the number of features. For example, if you have two features: A, B then the hyperplane is just a line and if there is three features: A, B, and C, your points will be plotted in the corresponding three-dimensional space based on their values for each independent variable. Support vector machine is a powerful supervised machine learning algorithm. It is used for both classification and regression problems.

ML is extracting data from knowledge. Machine learning is a study of algorithms that uses a provides computers the ability to learn from the data and predict outcomes with accuracy, without being explicitly programmed. Machine learning is sub-branched into three categories- supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning. As the name "supervised learning" suggests, here learning is based through example. We have a known set of inputs (called features, x) and outputs (called labels, y).

In this article, we'll be discussing 15 machine learning and data science projects for beginners as well for intermediate level. Projects are some of the best investments of your time. You'll enjoy learning, stay motivated, and make faster progress. For machine learning or data science projects finding a dataset is a quite difficult task. And, to build accurate models, you need a huge amount of data.