Statistical Learning
Fair Feature Importance Scores via Feature Occlusion and Permutation
Little, Camille, Navarro, Madeline, Segarra, Santiago, Allen, Genevera
As machine learning models increasingly impact society, their opaque nature poses challenges to trust and accountability, particularly in fairness contexts. Understanding how individual features influence model outcomes is crucial for building interpretable and equitable models. While feature importance metrics for accuracy are well-established, methods for assessing feature contributions to fairness remain underexplored. We propose two model-agnostic approaches to measure fair feature importance. First, we propose to compare model fairness before and after permuting feature values. This simple intervention-based approach decouples a feature and model predictions to measure its contribution to training. Second, we evaluate the fairness of models trained with and without a given feature. This occlusion-based score enjoys dramatic computational simplification via minipatch learning. Our empirical results reflect the simplicity and effectiveness of our proposed metrics for multiple predictive tasks. Both methods offer simple, scalable, and interpretable solutions to quantify the influence of features on fairness, providing new tools for responsible machine learning development.
From Average Sensitivity to Small-Loss Regret Bounds under Random-Order Model
Sakaue, Shinsaku, Yoshida, Yuichi
We study online learning in the random-order model, where the multiset of loss functions is chosen adversarially but revealed in a uniformly random order. Building on the batch-to-online conversion by Dong and Yoshida (2023), we show that if an offline algorithm admits a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation guarantee and the effect of $\varepsilon$ on its average sensitivity is characterized by a function $φ(\varepsilon)$, then an adaptive choice of $\varepsilon$ yields a small-loss regret bound of $\tilde O(φ^{\star}(\mathrm{OPT}_T))$, where $φ^{\star}$ is the concave conjugate of $φ$, $\mathrm{OPT}_T$ is the offline optimum over $T$ rounds, and $\tilde O$ hides polylogarithmic factors in $T$. Our method requires no regularity assumptions on loss functions, such as smoothness, and can be viewed as a generalization of the AdaGrad-style tuning applied to the approximation parameter $\varepsilon$. Our result recovers and strengthens the $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate regret bounds of Dong and Yoshida (2023) and yields small-loss regret bounds for online $k$-means clustering, low-rank approximation, and regression. We further apply our framework to online submodular function minimization using $(1\pm\varepsilon)$-cut sparsifiers of submodular hypergraphs, obtaining a small-loss regret bound of $\tilde O(n^{3/4}(1 + \mathrm{OPT}_T^{3/4}))$, where $n$ is the ground-set size. Our approach sheds light on the power of sparsification and related techniques in establishing small-loss regret bounds in the random-order model.
Optimal Estimation in Orthogonally Invariant Generalized Linear Models: Spectral Initialization and Approximate Message Passing
Zhang, Yihan, Ji, Hong Chang, Venkataramanan, Ramji, Mondelli, Marco
We consider the problem of parameter estimation from a generalized linear model with a random design matrix that is orthogonally invariant in law. Such a model allows the design have an arbitrary distribution of singular values and only assumes that its singular vectors are generic. It is a vast generalization of the i.i.d. Gaussian design typically considered in the theoretical literature, and is motivated by the fact that real data often have a complex correlation structure so that methods relying on i.i.d. assumptions can be highly suboptimal. Building on the paradigm of spectrally-initialized iterative optimization, this paper proposes optimal spectral estimators and combines them with an approximate message passing (AMP) algorithm, establishing rigorous performance guarantees for these two algorithmic steps. Both the spectral initialization and the subsequent AMP meet existing conjectures on the fundamental limits to estimation -- the former on the optimal sample complexity for efficient weak recovery, and the latter on the optimal errors. Numerical experiments suggest the effectiveness of our methods and accuracy of our theory beyond orthogonally invariant data.
StochasticRecursiveGradientDescentAscentfor StochasticNonconvex-Strongly-ConcaveMinimax Problems
We are interested in finding anO(ε)-stationary point of the functionΦ( ) = maxy Yf( ,y). Thisminimax optimization formulation includes manymachine learning applications such as regularized empirical risk minimization [41, 52], AUC maximization [39, 48], robust optimization [14, 46], adversarial training [16, 17, 40] and reinforcement learning [13, 43].