Label noise in data has long been an important problem in supervised learning applications as it affects the effectiveness of many widely used classification methods. Recently, important real-world applications, such as medical diagnosis and cybersecurity, have generated renewed interest in the Neyman-Pearson (NP) classification paradigm, which constrains the more severe type of error (e.g., the type I error) under a preferred level while minimizing the other (e.g., the type II error). However, there has been little research on the NP paradigm under label noise. It is somewhat surprising that even when common NP classifiers ignore the label noise in the training stage, they are still able to control the type I error with high probability. However, the price they pay is excessive conservativeness of the type I error and hence a significant drop in power (i.e., $1 - $ type II error). Assuming that domain experts provide lower bounds on the corruption severity, we propose the first theory-backed algorithm that adapts most state-of-the-art classification methods to the training label noise under the NP paradigm. The resulting classifiers not only control the type I error with high probability under the desired level but also improve power.

Generative models which use explicit density modeling (e.g., variational autoencoders, flow-based generative models) involve finding a mapping from a known distribution, e.g. Gaussian, to the unknown input distribution. This often requires searching over a class of non-linear functions (e.g., representable by a deep neural network). While effective in practice, the associated runtime/memory costs can increase rapidly, usually as a function of the performance desired in an application. We propose a much cheaper (and simpler) strategy to estimate this mapping based on adapting known results in kernel transfer operators. We show that our formulation enables highly efficient distribution approximation and sampling, and offers surprisingly good empirical performance that compares favorably with powerful baselines, but with significant runtime savings. We show that the algorithm also performs well in small sample size settings (in brain imaging).

The Intelligent decision of the unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV) has long been a challenging problem. The conventional search method can hardly satisfy the real-time demand during high dynamics air combat scenarios. The reinforcement learning (RL) method can significantly shorten the decision time via using neural networks. However, the sparse reward problem limits its convergence speed and the artificial prior experience reward can easily deviate its optimal convergent direction of the original task, which raises great difficulties for the RL air combat application. In this paper, we propose a homotopy-based soft actor-critic method (HSAC) which focuses on addressing these problems via following the homotopy path between the original task with sparse reward and the auxiliary task with artificial prior experience reward. The convergence and the feasibility of this method are also proved in this paper. To confirm our method feasibly, we construct a detailed 3D air combat simulation environment for the RL-based methods training firstly, and we implement our method in both the attack horizontal flight UCAV task and the self-play confrontation task. Experimental results show that our method performs better than the methods only utilizing the sparse reward or the artificial prior experience reward. The agent trained by our method can reach more than 98.3% win rate in the attack horizontal flight UCAV task and average 67.4% win rate when confronted with the agents trained by the other two methods.

In this paper, we discover a two-phase phenomenon in the learning of multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs). I.e., in the first phase, the training loss does not decrease significantly, but the similarity of features between different samples keeps increasing, which hurts the feature diversity. We explain such a two-phase phenomenon in terms of the learning dynamics of the MLP. Furthermore, we propose two normalization operations to eliminate the two-phase phenomenon, which avoids the decrease of the feature diversity and speeds up the training process.

Producing densely annotated data is a difficult and tedious task for medical imaging applications. To address this problem, we propose a novel approach to generate supervision for semi-supervised semantic segmentation. We argue that visually similar regions between labeled and unlabeled images likely contain the same semantics and therefore should share their label. Following this thought, we use a small number of labeled images as reference material and match pixels in an unlabeled image to the semantics of the best fitting pixel in a reference set. This way, we avoid pitfalls such as confirmation bias, common in purely prediction-based pseudo-labeling. Since our method does not require any architectural changes or accompanying networks, one can easily insert it into existing frameworks. We achieve the same performance as a standard fully supervised model on X-ray anatomy segmentation, albeit 95% fewer labeled images. Aside from an in-depth analysis of different aspects of our proposed method, we further demonstrate the effectiveness of our reference-guided learning paradigm by comparing our approach against existing methods for retinal fluid segmentation with competitive performance as we improve upon recent work by up to 15% mean IoU.

Developing and implementing AI-based solutions help state and federal government agencies, research institutions, and commercial companies enhance decision-making processes, automate chain operations, and reduce the consumption of natural and human resources. At the same time, most AI approaches used in practice can only be represented as "black boxes" and suffer from the lack of transparency. This can eventually lead to unexpected outcomes and undermine trust in such systems. Therefore, it is crucial not only to develop effective and robust AI systems, but to make sure their internal processes are explainable and fair. Our goal in this chapter is to introduce the topic of designing assurance methods for AI systems with high-impact decisions using the example of the technology sector of the US economy. We explain how these fields would benefit from revealing cause-effect relationships between key metrics in the dataset by providing the causal experiment on technology economics dataset. Several causal inference approaches and AI assurance techniques are reviewed and the transformation of the data into a graph-structured dataset is demonstrated.

An outlier is an event or observation that is defined as an unusual activity, intrusion, or a suspicious data point that lies at an irregular distance from a population. The definition of an outlier event, however, is subjective and depends on the application and the domain (Energy, Health, Wireless Network, etc.). It is important to detect outlier events as carefully as possible to avoid infrastructure failures because anomalous events can cause minor to severe damage to infrastructure. For instance, an attack on a cyber-physical system such as a microgrid may initiate voltage or frequency instability, thereby damaging a smart inverter which involves very expensive repairing. Unusual activities in microgrids can be mechanical faults, behavior changes in the system, human or instrument errors or a malicious attack. Accordingly, and due to its variability, Outlier Detection (OD) is an ever-growing research field. In this chapter, we discuss the progress of OD methods using AI techniques. For that, the fundamental concepts of each OD model are introduced via multiple categories. Broad range of OD methods are categorized into six major categories: Statistical-based, Distance-based, Density-based, Clustering-based, Learning-based, and Ensemble methods. For every category, we discuss recent state-of-the-art approaches, their application areas, and performances. After that, a brief discussion regarding the advantages, disadvantages, and challenges of each technique is provided with recommendations on future research directions. This survey aims to guide the reader to better understand recent progress of OD methods for the assurance of AI.

Owing to the benefits for customers (lower prices), drivers (higher revenues), aggregation companies (higher revenues) and the environment (fewer vehicles), on-demand ride pooling (e.g., Uber pool, Grab Share) has become quite popular. The significant computational complexity of matching vehicles to combinations of requests has meant that traditional ride pooling approaches are myopic in that they do not consider the impact of current matches on future value for vehicles/drivers. Recently, Neural Approximate Dynamic Programming (NeurADP) has employed value decomposition with Approximate Dynamic Programming (ADP) to outperform leading approaches by considering the impact of an individual agent's (vehicle) chosen actions on the future value of that agent. However, in order to ensure scalability and facilitate city-scale ride pooling, NeurADP completely ignores the impact of other agents actions on individual agent/vehicle value. As demonstrated in our experimental results, ignoring the impact of other agents actions on individual value can have a significant impact on the overall performance when there is increased competition among vehicles for demand. Our key contribution is a novel mechanism based on computing conditional expectations through joint conditional probabilities for capturing dependencies on other agents actions without increasing the complexity of training or decision making. We show that our new approach, Conditional Expectation based Value Decomposition (CEVD) outperforms NeurADP by up to 9.76% in terms of overall requests served, which is a significant improvement on a city wide benchmark taxi dataset.

Consistency is the theoretical property of a meta learning algorithm that ensures that, under certain assumptions, it can adapt to any task at test time. An open question is whether and how theoretical consistency translates into practice, in comparison to inconsistent algorithms. In this paper, we empirically investigate this question on a set of representative meta-RL algorithms. We find that theoretically consistent algorithms can indeed usually adapt to out-of-distribution (OOD) tasks, while inconsistent ones cannot, although they can still fail in practice for reasons like poor exploration. We further find that theoretically inconsistent algorithms can be made consistent by continuing to update all agent components on the OOD tasks, and adapt as well or better than originally consistent ones. We conclude that theoretical consistency is indeed a desirable property, and inconsistent meta-RL algorithms can easily be made consistent to enjoy the same benefits.

The abductive natural language inference task ($\alpha$NLI) is proposed to infer the most plausible explanation between the cause and the event. In the $\alpha$NLI task, two observations are given, and the most plausible hypothesis is asked to pick out from the candidates. Existing methods model the relation between each candidate hypothesis separately and penalize the inference network uniformly. In this paper, we argue that it is unnecessary to distinguish the reasoning abilities among correct hypotheses; and similarly, all wrong hypotheses contribute the same when explaining the reasons of the observations. Therefore, we propose to group instead of ranking the hypotheses and design a structural loss called ``joint softmax focal loss'' in this paper. Based on the observation that the hypotheses are generally semantically related, we have designed a novel interactive language model aiming at exploiting the rich interaction among competing hypotheses. We name this new model for $\alpha$NLI: Interactive Model with Structural Loss (IMSL). The experimental results show that our IMSL has achieved the highest performance on the RoBERTa-large pretrained model, with ACC and AUC results increased by about 1\% and 5\% respectively.