In this paper, we propose a gradient boosting algorithm called \textit{adaptive boosting histogram transform} (\textit{ABHT}) for regression to illustrate the local adaptivity of gradient boosting algorithms in histogram transform ensemble learning. From the theoretical perspective, when the target function lies in a locally H\"older continuous space, we show that our ABHT can filter out the regions with different orders of smoothness. Consequently, we are able to prove that the upper bound of the convergence rates of ABHT is strictly smaller than the lower bound of \textit{parallel ensemble histogram transform} (\textit{PEHT}). In the experiments, both synthetic and real-world data experiments empirically validate the theoretical results, which demonstrates the advantageous performance and local adaptivity of our ABHT.

A wide range of optimization problems arising in machine learning can be solved by gradient descent algorithms, and a central question in this area is how to efficiently compress a large-scale dataset so as to reduce the computational complexity. {\em Coreset} is a popular data compression technique that has been extensively studied before. However, most of existing coreset methods are problem-dependent and cannot be used as a general tool for a broader range of applications. A key obstacle is that they often rely on the pseudo-dimension and total sensitivity bound that can be very high or hard to obtain. In this paper, based on the ''locality'' property of gradient descent algorithms, we propose a new framework, termed ''sequential coreset'', which effectively avoids these obstacles. Moreover, our method is particularly suitable for sparse optimization whence the coreset size can be further reduced to be only poly-logarithmically dependent on the dimension. In practice, the experimental results suggest that our method can save a large amount of running time compared with the baseline algorithms.

This paper introduces the proposed automatic minuting system of the Hitachi team for the First Shared Task on Automatic Minuting (AutoMin-2021). We utilize a reference-free approach (i.e., without using training minutes) for automatic minuting (Task A), which first splits a transcript into blocks on the basis of topics and subsequently summarizes those blocks with a pre-trained BART model fine-tuned on a summarization corpus of chat dialogue. In addition, we apply a technique of argument mining to the generated minutes, reorganizing them in a well-structured and coherent way. We utilize multiple relevance scores to determine whether or not a minute is derived from the same meeting when either a transcript or another minute is given (Task B and C). On top of those scores, we train a conventional machine learning model to bind them and to make final decisions. Consequently, our approach for Task A achieve the best adequacy score among all submissions and close performance to the best system in terms of grammatical correctness and fluency. For Task B and C, the proposed model successfully outperformed a majority vote baseline.

Many deep learning models pick up objectives using the gradient-descent method. Gradient-descent optimization needs a big number of training samples for a model to converge. That creates it out of shape for few-shot learning. We train our models to learn to achieve a sure objective in generic deep learning models. However, humans train to learn any objective. There are different optimization methods that emphasize learn-to-learn mechanisms.

KNN can easily be mapped to our real lives. If you want to learn about a person, of whom you have no information, you might like to find out about his close friends and the circles he moves in and gain access to his/her information!

Finding the best machine-learning algorithm to use for your problem can be challenging. However, usually, we do not have enough time for that. Given the following seven criteria to choose on, which will help to shortlist your choices to be able to apply them in a short time. The first criteria to choose your model on is explainability. If you need to explain the model and why it produces certain output to a non-technical audience such as stakeholders or business partners.

This article is for current and aspiring machine learning practitioners looking to implement solutions to real-world machine learning problems. It is an introductory article suitable for beginners with no previous knowledge of machine learning or artificial intelligence (AI). This is the first article on my series "Machine Learning with Python". I will introduce the fundamental concepts of Machine Learning, its applications and how to set up our working environment as well as a hands on practices on a simple project. Machine learning is a type of artificial intelligence (AI) that provides computers with the ability to learn without being explicitly programmed.

Now that we have the model, we can visualize it by overlaying it over the original training data. To do this, we'll extract the slope and intercept from the model object and then plot the line over the training data using ggplot2. As you look at this, remember what we're actually doing here. We took a training dataset and used lm() to compute the best fit line through those training data points. Ultimately, this yields a slope and intercept that enable us to draw a line of the form .

Active Position Estimation (APE) is the task of localizing one or more targets using one or more sensing platforms. APE is a key task for search and rescue missions, wildlife monitoring, source term estimation, and collaborative mobile robotics. Success in APE depends on the level of cooperation of the sensing platforms, their number, their degrees of freedom and the quality of the information gathered. APE control laws enable active sensing by satisfying either pure-exploitative or pure-explorative criteria. The former minimizes the uncertainty on position estimation; whereas the latter drives the platform closer to its task completion. In this paper, we define the main elements of APE to systematically classify and critically discuss the state of the art in this domain. We also propose a reference framework as a formalism to classify APE-related solutions. Overall, this survey explores the principal challenges and envisages the main research directions in the field of autonomous perception systems for localization tasks. It is also beneficial to promote the development of robust active sensing methods for search and tracking applications.

Existing online multi-label classification works cannot well handle the online label thresholding problem and lack the regret analysis for their online algorithms. This paper proposes a novel framework of adaptive label thresholding algorithms for online multi-label classification, with the aim to overcome the drawbacks of existing methods. The key feature of our framework is that both scoring and thresholding models are included as important components of the online multi-label classifier and are incorporated into one online optimization problem. Further, in order to establish the relationship between scoring and thresholding models, a novel multi-label classification loss function is derived, which measures to what an extent the multi-label classifier can distinguish between relevant labels and irrelevant ones for an incoming instance. Based on this new framework and loss function, we present a first-order linear algorithm and a second-order one, which both enjoy closed form update, but rely on different techniques for updating the multi-label classifier. Both algorithms are proved to achieve a sub-linear regret. Using Mercer kernels, our first-order algorithm has been extended to deal with nonlinear multi-label prediction tasks. Experiments show the advantage of our linear and nonlinear algorithms, in terms of various multi-label performance metrics.