Fostered by novel analytical techniques, digitalization and automation, modern bioprocess development provides high amounts of heterogeneous experimental data, containing valuable process information. In this context, data-driven methods like machine learning (ML) approaches have a high potential to rationally explore large design spaces while exploiting experimental facilities most efficiently. The aim of this review is to demonstrate how ML methods have been applied so far in bioprocess development, especially in strain engineering and selection, bioprocess optimization, scale-up, monitoring and control of bioprocesses. For each topic, we will highlight successful application cases, current challenges and point out domains that can potentially benefit from technology transfer and further progress in the field of ML.

Existing methods for human mesh recovery mainly focus on single-view frameworks, but they often fail to produce accurate results due to the ill-posed setup. Considering the maturity of the multi-view motion capture system, in this paper, we propose to solve the prior ill-posed problem by leveraging multiple images from different views, thus significantly enhancing the quality of recovered meshes. In particular, we present a novel \textbf{M}ulti-view human body \textbf{M}esh \textbf{T}ranslator (MMT) model for estimating human body mesh with the help of vision transformer. Specifically, MMT takes multi-view images as input and translates them to targeted meshes in a single-forward manner. MMT fuses features of different views in both encoding and decoding phases, leading to representations embedded with global information. Additionally, to ensure the tokens are intensively focused on the human pose and shape, MMT conducts cross-view alignment at the feature level by projecting 3D keypoint positions to each view and enforcing their consistency in geometry constraints. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that MMT outperforms existing single or multi-view models by a large margin for human mesh recovery task, notably, 28.8\% improvement in MPVE over the current state-of-the-art method on the challenging HUMBI dataset. Qualitative evaluation also verifies the effectiveness of MMT in reconstructing high-quality human mesh. Codes will be made available upon acceptance.

Meta-learning or learning to learn is a popular approach for learning new tasks with limited data (i.e., few-shot learning) by leveraging the commonalities among different tasks. However, meta-learned models can perform poorly when context data is limited, or when data is drawn from an out-of-distribution (OoD) task. Especially in safety-critical settings, this necessitates an uncertainty-aware approach to meta-learning. In addition, the often multimodal nature of task distributions can pose unique challenges to meta-learning methods. In this work, we present UnLiMiTD (uncertainty-aware meta-learning for multimodal task distributions), a novel method for meta-learning that (1) makes probabilistic predictions on in-distribution tasks efficiently, (2) is capable of detecting OoD context data at test time, and (3) performs on heterogeneous, multimodal task distributions. To achieve this goal, we take a probabilistic perspective and train a parametric, tuneable distribution over tasks on the meta-dataset. We construct this distribution by performing Bayesian inference on a linearized neural network, leveraging Gaussian process theory. We demonstrate that UnLiMiTD's predictions compare favorably to, and outperform in most cases, the standard baselines, especially in the low-data regime. Furthermore, we show that UnLiMiTD is effective in detecting data from OoD tasks. Finally, we confirm that both of these findings continue to hold in the multimodal task-distribution setting.

All state-of-the-art (SOTA) differentially private machine learning (DP ML) methods are iterative in nature, and their privacy analyses allow publicly releasing the intermediate training checkpoints. However, DP ML benchmarks, and even practical deployments, typically use only the final training checkpoint to make predictions. In this work, for the first time, we comprehensively explore various methods that aggregate intermediate checkpoints to improve the utility of DP training. Empirically, we demonstrate that checkpoint aggregations provide significant gains in the prediction accuracy over the existing SOTA for CIFAR10 and StackOverflow datasets, and that these gains get magnified in settings with periodically varying training data distributions. For instance, we improve SOTA StackOverflow accuracies to 22.7% (+0.43% absolute) for $\epsilon=8.2$, and 23.84% (+0.43%) for $\epsilon=18.9$. Theoretically, we show that uniform tail averaging of checkpoints improves the empirical risk minimization bound compared to the last checkpoint of DP-SGD. Lastly, we initiate an exploration into estimating the uncertainty that DP noise adds in the predictions of DP ML models. We prove that, under standard assumptions on the loss function, the sample variance from last few checkpoints provides a good approximation of the variance of the final model of a DP run. Empirically, we show that the last few checkpoints can provide a reasonable lower bound for the variance of a converged DP model.

Understanding generalization and robustness of machine learning models fundamentally relies on assuming an appropriate metric on the data space. Identifying such a metric is particularly challenging for non-Euclidean data such as graphs. Here, we propose a pseudometric for attributed graphs, the Tree Mover's Distance (TMD), and study its relation to generalization. Via a hierarchical optimal transport problem, TMD reflects the local distribution of node attributes as well as the distribution of local computation trees, which are known to be decisive for the learning behavior of graph neural networks (GNNs). First, we show that TMD captures properties relevant to graph classification: a simple TMD-SVM performs competitively with standard GNNs. Second, we relate TMD to generalization of GNNs under distribution shifts, and show that it correlates well with performance drop under such shifts.

Cloud removal is an essential task in remote sensing data analysis. As the image sensors are distant from the earth ground, it is likely that part of the area of interests is covered by cloud. Moreover, the atmosphere in between creates a constant haze layer upon the acquired images. To recover the ground image, we propose to use scattering model for temporal sequence of images of any scene in the framework of low rank and sparse models. We further develop its variant, which is much faster and yet more accurate. To measure the performance of different methods {\em objectively}, we develop a semi-realistic simulation method to produce cloud cover so that various methods can be quantitatively analysed, which enables detailed study of many aspects of cloud removal algorithms, including verifying the effectiveness of proposed models in comparison with the state-of-the-arts, including deep learning models, and addressing the long standing problem of the determination of regularisation parameters. The latter is companioned with theoretic analysis on the range of the sparsity regularisation parameter and verified numerically.

Clustering models constitute a class of unsupervised machine learning methods which are used in a number of application pipelines, and play a vital role in modern data science. With recent advancements in deep learning -- deep clustering models have emerged as the current state-of-the-art over traditional clustering approaches, especially for high-dimensional image datasets. While traditional clustering approaches have been analyzed from a robustness perspective, no prior work has investigated adversarial attacks and robustness for deep clustering models in a principled manner. To bridge this gap, we propose a blackbox attack using Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) where the adversary does not know which deep clustering model is being used, but can query it for outputs. We analyze our attack against multiple state-of-the-art deep clustering models and real-world datasets, and find that it is highly successful. We then employ some natural unsupervised defense approaches, but find that these are unable to mitigate our attack. Finally, we attack Face++, a production-level face clustering API service, and find that we can significantly reduce its performance as well. Through this work, we thus aim to motivate the need for truly robust deep clustering models.

Machine learning based traffic forecasting models leverage sophisticated spatiotemporal auto-correlations to provide accurate predictions of city-wide traffic states. However, existing methods assume a reliable and unbiased forecasting environment, which is not always available in the wild. In this work, we investigate the vulnerability of spatiotemporal traffic forecasting models and propose a practical adversarial spatiotemporal attack framework. Specifically, instead of simultaneously attacking all geo-distributed data sources, an iterative gradient-guided node saliency method is proposed to identify the time-dependent set of victim nodes. Furthermore, we devise a spatiotemporal gradient descent based scheme to generate real-valued adversarial traffic states under a perturbation constraint. Meanwhile, we theoretically demonstrate the worst performance bound of adversarial traffic forecasting attacks. Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets show that the proposed two-step framework achieves up to $67.8\%$ performance degradation on various advanced spatiotemporal forecasting models. Remarkably, we also show that adversarial training with our proposed attacks can significantly improve the robustness of spatiotemporal traffic forecasting models. Our code is available in \url{https://github.com/luckyfan-cs/ASTFA}.

Abstract--Industry 5.0 aims at maximizing the collaboration Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 both rely heavily on IoT The IIoT's basic premise is that intelligent machines are often more I. HE fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0) enables smart manufacturing via the application of various technologies, On the other hand, IIoT data samples are usually nonstationary such as the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence data streams generated in ever-changing IIoT environments (AI), big data analytics, cloud computing, and edge due to their dynamic nature [6]. Industry 4.0 also applications, IIoT data analytics often suffers from concept achieves technological advancements that increase the level of drift issues when IIoT data distributions change over time. Recently, The occurrence of concept drift poses considerable challenges as the fifth industrial revolution, Industry 5.0 has been in developing ML models, since their learning performance proposed as a human-centered design solution for the next evolutionary may progressively degrade owing to data distribution changes state. Thus, advanced online adaptive learning models should and machines work collaboratively with human resources to be developed to detect and react to concept drift that occurs enable customizable autonomous production through business in IIoT data streams. The drift adaptation procedure is also social networks [1]. In Industry 5.0, humans can devote their referred to as automated model updates in the network data creativity to responsible activities, while computers take over analytics automation process, as its main purpose is to improve repetitive and monotonous duties, hence improving production model performance by updating the learning model.

Intelligent systems that use Machine Learning classification algorithms are increasingly common in everyday society. However, many systems use black-box models that do not have characteristics that allow for self-explanation of their predictions. This situation leads researchers in the field and society to the following question: How can I trust the prediction of a model I cannot understand? In this sense, XAI emerges as a field of AI that aims to create techniques capable of explaining the decisions of the classifier to the end-user. As a result, several techniques have emerged, such as Explanation-by-Example, which has a few initiatives consolidated by the community currently working with XAI. This research explores the Item Response Theory (IRT) as a tool to explaining the models and measuring the level of reliability of the Explanation-by-Example approach. To this end, four datasets with different levels of complexity were used, and the Random Forest model was used as a hypothesis test. From the test set, 83.8% of the errors are from instances in which the IRT points out the model as unreliable.