Domain generalization (DG) methods aim to develop models that generalize to settings where the test distribution is different from the training data. In this paper, we focus on the challenging problem of multi-source zero shot DG (MDG), where labeled training data from multiple source domains is available but with no access to data from the target domain. A wide range of solutions have been proposed for this problem, including the state-of-the-art multi-domain ensembling approaches. Despite these advances, the na\"ive ERM solution of pooling all source data together and training a single classifier is surprisingly effective on standard benchmarks. In this paper, we hypothesize that, it is important to elucidate the link between pre-specified domain labels and MDG performance, in order to explain this behavior. More specifically, we consider two popular classes of MDG algorithms -- distributional robust optimization (DRO) and multi-domain ensembles, in order to demonstrate how inferring custom domain groups can lead to consistent improvements over the original domain labels that come with the dataset. To this end, we propose (i) Group-DRO++, which incorporates an explicit clustering step to identify custom domains in an existing DRO technique; and (ii) DReaME, which produces effective multi-domain ensembles through implicit domain re-labeling with a novel meta-optimization algorithm. Using empirical studies on multiple standard benchmarks, we show that our variants consistently outperform ERM by significant margins (1.5% - 9%), and produce state-of-the-art MDG performance. Our code can be found at https://github.com/kowshikthopalli/DREAME

Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have been widely applied in different scenarios thanks to the development of deep neural networks. The original GAN was proposed based on the non-parametric assumption of the infinite capacity of networks. However, it is still unknown whether GANs can fit the target distribution without any prior information. Due to the overconfident assumption, many issues remain unaddressed in GANs' training, such as non-convergence, mode collapses, gradient vanishing. Regularization and normalization are common methods of introducing prior information to stabilize training and improve discrimination. Although a handful number of regularization and normalization methods have been proposed for GANs, to the best of our knowledge, there exists no comprehensive survey that primarily focuses on objectives and development of these methods, apart from some in-comprehensive and limited scope studies. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive survey on the regularization and normalization techniques from different perspectives of GANs training. First, we systematically describe different perspectives of GANs training and thus obtain the different objectives of regularization and normalization. Based on these objectives, we propose a new taxonomy. Furthermore, we compare the performance of the mainstream methods on different datasets and investigate the applications of regularization and normalization techniques that have been frequently employed in state-of-the-art GANs. Finally, we highlight potential future directions of research in this domain. Code and studies related to the regularization and normalization of GANs in this work is summarized on https://github.com/iceli1007/GANs-Regularization-Review.

Hope is characterized as openness of spirit toward the future, a desire, expectation, and wish for something to happen or to be true that remarkably affects human's state of mind, emotions, behaviors, and decisions. Hope is usually associated with concepts of desired expectations and possibility/probability concerning the future. Despite its importance, hope has rarely been studied as a social media analysis task. This paper presents a hope speech dataset that classifies each tweet first into "Hope" and "Not Hope", then into three fine-grained hope categories: "Generalized Hope", "Realistic Hope", and "Unrealistic Hope" (along with "Not Hope"). English tweets in the first half of 2022 were collected to build this dataset. Furthermore, we describe our annotation process and guidelines in detail and discuss the challenges of classifying hope and the limitations of the existing hope speech detection corpora. In addition, we reported several baselines based on different learning approaches, such as traditional machine learning, deep learning, and transformers, to benchmark our dataset. We evaluated our baselines using weighted-averaged and macro-averaged F1-scores. Observations show that a strict process for annotator selection and detailed annotation guidelines enhanced the dataset's quality. This strict annotation process resulted in promising performance for simple machine learning classifiers with only bi-grams; however, binary and multiclass hope speech detection results reveal that contextual embedding models have higher performance in this dataset.

One of the most efficient methods for model compression is hint distillation, where the student model is injected with information (hints) from several different layers of the teacher model. Although the selection of hint points can drastically alter the compression performance, conventional distillation approaches overlook this fact and use the same hint points as in the early studies. Therefore, we propose a clustering based hint selection methodology, where the layers of teacher model are clustered with respect to several metrics and the cluster centers are used as the hint points. Our method is applicable for any student network, once it is applied on a chosen teacher network. The proposed approach is validated in CIFAR-100 and ImageNet datasets, using various teacher-student pairs and numerous hint distillation methods. Our results show that hint points selected by our algorithm results in superior compression performance compared to state-of-the-art knowledge distillation algorithms on the same student models and datasets.

This article was published as a part of the Data Science Blogathon. AdaBoost is a boosting algorithm used in data science. It is one of the best-performing and widely used algorithms. In data science interviews, there are lots of questions asked related to the AdaBoost algorithm, whether a working mechanism, the mathematics behind it, or the graphical intuition. In this article, we will cover some of the most asked questions related to the AdaBoost algorithm in data science Interviews.

This article was published as a part of the Data Science Blogathon. Hyperparameter tuning or optimization is important in any machine learning model training activity. The hyperparameters of a model cannot be determined from the given datasets through the learning process. However, they are very crucial to control the learning process itself. These hyperparameters originate from the mathematical formulation of machine learning models. For example, the weights learned while training a linear regression model are parameters, but the learning rate in gradient descent is a hyperparameter.

Connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) are supposed to share the road with human-driven vehicles (HDVs) in a foreseeable future. Therefore, considering the mixed traffic environment is more pragmatic, as the well-planned operation of CAVs may be interrupted by HDVs. In the circumstance that human behaviors have significant impacts, CAVs need to understand HDV behaviors to make safe actions. In this study, we develop a Driver Digital Twin (DDT) for the online prediction of personalized lane change behavior, allowing CAVs to predict surrounding vehicles' behaviors with the help of the digital twin technology. DDT is deployed on a vehicle-edge-cloud architecture, where the cloud server models the driver behavior for each HDV based on the historical naturalistic driving data, while the edge server processes the real-time data from each driver with his/her digital twin on the cloud to predict the lane change maneuver. The proposed system is first evaluated on a human-in-the-loop co-simulation platform, and then in a field implementation with three passenger vehicles connected through the 4G/LTE cellular network. The lane change intention can be recognized in 6 seconds on average before the vehicle crosses the lane separation line, and the Mean Euclidean Distance between the predicted trajectory and GPS ground truth is 1.03 meters within a 4-second prediction window. Compared to the general model, using a personalized model can improve prediction accuracy by 27.8%. The demonstration video of the proposed system can be watched at https://youtu.be/5cbsabgIOdM.

Clinical prediction models estimate an individual's risk of a particular health outcome, conditional on their values of multiple predictors. A developed model is a consequence of the development dataset and the chosen model building strategy, including the sample size, number of predictors and analysis method (e.g., regression or machine learning). Here, we raise the concern that many models are developed using small datasets that lead to instability in the model and its predictions (estimated risks). We define four levels of model stability in estimated risks moving from the overall mean to the individual level. Then, through simulation and case studies of statistical and machine learning approaches, we show instability in a model's estimated risks is often considerable, and ultimately manifests itself as miscalibration of predictions in new data. Therefore, we recommend researchers should always examine instability at the model development stage and propose instability plots and measures to do so. This entails repeating the model building steps (those used in the development of the original prediction model) in each of multiple (e.g., 1000) bootstrap samples, to produce multiple bootstrap models, and then deriving (i) a prediction instability plot of bootstrap model predictions (y-axis) versus original model predictions (x-axis), (ii) a calibration instability plot showing calibration curves for the bootstrap models in the original sample; and (iii) the instability index, which is the mean absolute difference between individuals' original and bootstrap model predictions. A case study is used to illustrate how these instability assessments help reassure (or not) whether model predictions are likely to be reliable (or not), whilst also informing a model's critical appraisal (risk of bias rating), fairness assessment and further validation requirements.

Metasurfaces (MTSs) are increasingly emerging as enabling technologies to meet the demands for multi-functional, small form-factor, efficient, reconfigurable, tunable, and low-cost radio-frequency (RF) components because of their ability to manipulate waves in a sub-wavelength thickness through modified boundary conditions. They enable the design of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) for adaptable wireless channels and smart radio environments, wherein the inherently stochastic nature of the wireless environment is transformed into a programmable propagation channel. In particular, space-limited RF applications, such as communications and radar, that have strict radiation requirements are currently being investigated for potential RIS deployment. The RIS comprises sub-wavelength units or meta-atoms, which are independently controlled and whose geometry and material determine the spectral response of the RIS. Conventionally, designing RIS to yield the desired EM response requires trial and error by iteratively investigating a large possibility of various geometries and materials through thousands of full-wave EM simulations. In this context, machine/deep learning (ML/DL) techniques are proving critical in reducing the computational cost and time of RIS inverse design. Instead of explicitly solving Maxwell's equations, DL models learn physics-based relationships through supervised training data. The ML/DL techniques also aid in RIS deployment for numerous wireless applications, which requires dealing with multiple channel links between the base station (BS) and the users. As a result, the BS and RIS beamformers require a joint design, wherein the RIS elements must be rapidly reconfigured. This chapter provides a synopsis of DL techniques for both inverse RIS design and RIS-assisted wireless systems.

Like the more well-known Dirichlet distribution, it includes the uniform distribution on the simplex, but is otherwise distinct from the Dirichlet distribution. There is a temperature parameter, named by analogy with the Boltzmann (or Gibbs) distribution in thermodynamics. In the zero temperature limit, samples become concentrated at the corners of the simplex and the distribution approximates a categorical distribution: the limit of a continuous distribution approximates a discrete distribution, hence the portmanteau "Concrete". There are additionally K parameters that are easily interpreted as unnormalized probabilities for the K categories in this limit; a single constraint reduces these to K 1 independent parameters. The Concrete distribution has applications in machine learning for stochastic neural networks with discrete random variables, such as random sampling from discrete distributions and estimation of parameter gradients through backpropagation. One way of constructing the Concrete distribution is from combining Gumbel distributions through the softmax function, hence its alternative name of the Gumbel-softmax distribution. The differentiability of the softmax function, unlike the argmax function, allows for backpropagation.