Statistical Learning
GARNET: Reduced-Rank Topology Learning for Robust and Scalable Graph Neural Networks
Deng, Chenhui, Li, Xiuyu, Feng, Zhuo, Zhang, Zhiru
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have been increasingly deployed in various applications that involve learning on non-Euclidean data. However, recent studies show that GNNs are vulnerable to graph adversarial attacks. Although there are several defense methods to improve GNN robustness by eliminating adversarial components, they may also impair the underlying clean graph structure that contributes to GNN training. In addition, few of those defense models can scale to large graphs due to their high computational complexity and memory usage. In this paper, we propose GARNET, a scalable spectral method to boost the adversarial robustness of GNN models. GARNET first leverages weighted spectral embedding to construct a base graph, which is not only resistant to adversarial attacks but also contains critical (clean) graph structure for GNN training. Next, GARNET further refines the base graph by pruning additional uncritical edges based on probabilistic graphical model. GARNET has been evaluated on various datasets, including a large graph with millions of nodes. Our extensive experiment results show that GARNET achieves adversarial accuracy improvement and runtime speedup over state-of-the-art GNN (defense) models by up to 13.27% and 14.7x, respectively.
Randomized Greedy Algorithms and Composable Coreset for k-Center Clustering with Outliers
Ding, Hu, Huang, Ruomin, Liu, Kai, Yu, Haikuo, Wang, Zixiu
In this paper, we study the problem of k-center clustering with outliers. The problem has many important applications in real world, but the presence of outliers can significantly increase the computational complexity. Though a number of methods have been developed in the past decades, it is still quite challenging to design quality guaranteed algorithm with low complexity for this problem. Our idea is inspired by the greedy method, Gonzalez's algorithm, that was developed for solving the ordinary k-center clustering problem. Based on some novel observations, we show that a simple randomized version of this greedy strategy actually can handle outliers efficiently. We further show that this randomized greedy approach also yields small coreset for the problem in doubling metrics (even if the doubling dimension is not given), which can greatly reduce the computational complexity. Moreover, together with the partial clustering framework proposed by Guha et al. (2019), we prove that our coreset method can be applied to distributed data with a low communication complexity. The experimental results suggest that our algorithms can achieve near optimal solutions and yield lower complexities comparing with the existing methods.
Sublinear Time Algorithms for Several Geometric Optimization (With Outliers) Problems In Machine Learning
In this paper, we study several important geometric optimization problems arising in machine learning. First, we revisit the Minimum Enclosing Ball (MEB) problem in Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^d$. The problem has been extensively studied before, but real-world machine learning tasks often need to handle large-scale datasets so that we cannot even afford linear time algorithms. Motivated by the recent studies on {\em beyond worst-case analysis}, we introduce the notion of stability for MEB, which is natural and easy to understand. Roughly speaking, an instance of MEB is stable, if the radius of the resulting ball cannot be significantly reduced by removing a small fraction of the input points. Under the stability assumption, we present two sampling algorithms for computing radius-approximate MEB with sample complexities independent of the number of input points $n$. In particular, the second algorithm has the sample complexity even independent of the dimensionality $d$. We also consider the general case without the stability assumption. We present a hybrid algorithm that can output either a radius-approximate MEB or a covering-approximate MEB. Our algorithm improves the running time and the number of passes for the previous sublinear MEB algorithms. Our method relies on two novel techniques, the Uniform-Adaptive Sampling method and Sandwich Lemma. Furthermore, we observe that these two techniques can be generalized to design sublinear time algorithms for a broader range of geometric optimization problems with outliers in high dimensions, including MEB with outliers, one-class and two-class linear SVMs with outliers, $k$-center clustering with outliers, and flat fitting with outliers. Our proposed algorithms also work fine for kernels.
Customer Analytics in Python 2023 - Coupons ME
Data science and Marketing are two of the key driving forces that help companies create value and stay on top in today's fast-paced economy. Welcome to Customer Analytics in Python โ the place where marketing and data science meet! This course is the best way to distinguish yourself with a very rare and extremely valuable skillset. This course is packed with knowledge, covering some of the most exciting methods used by companies, all implemented in Python. Since Customer Analytics is a broad topic, we have created 5 different parts to explore various sides of the analytical process.
Best of Machine Learning Research in 2022 part2
Abstract: Machine learning is the dominant approach to artificial intelligence, through which computers learn from data and experience. In the framework of supervised learning, for a computer to learn from data accurately and efficiently, some auxiliary information about the data distribution and target function should be provided to it through the learning model. This notion of auxiliary information relates to the concept of regularization in statistical learning theory. A common feature among real-world datasets is that data domains are multiscale and target functions are well-behaved and smooth. In this paper, we propose a learning model that exploits this multiscale data structure and discuss its statistical and computational benefits.
Hierarchical Clustering: A Practical Introduction of Agglomerative and Divisive Methods
In this article, we are going to talk in detail about hierarchical clustering like Why we need hierarchical clustering?, How hierarchical clustering works?, Types of hierarchical clustering?, On which dataset it is applicable? . Before moving forward to hierarchal clustering, we should know why we are talking about hierarchical clustering? even when we have K Means clustering. If you have studied K Means then you know that this algorithm works on the distance to centroid method to create a cluster. Although it works well if you have well defined boundaries type dataset that has less outliers. In above picture, K Means is working well but when we move towards some complex datasets then the problem arises and K Means don't work properly. As you can see in below picture, K Means is failing in making clusters.
How Bayesian additive regression trees(BART) are used part2(Machine Learning)
Abstract: Methods utilizing instrumental variables have been a fundamental statistical approach to estimation in the presence of unmeasured confounding, usually occurring in non-randomized observational data common to fields such as economics and public health. However, such methods usually make constricting linearity and additivity assumptions that are inapplicable to the complex modeling challenges of today. The growing body of observational data being collected will necessitate flexible regression modeling while also being able to control for confounding using instrumental variables. Therefore, this article presents a nonlinear instrumental variable regression model based on Bayesian regression tree ensembles to estimate such relationships, including interactions, in the presence of confounding. One exciting application of this method is to use genetic variants as instruments, known as Mendelian randomization.
How Bayesian additive regression trees(BART) are used part3(Machine Learning)
Abstract: Using ensemble methods for regression has been a large success in obtaining high-accuracy prediction. Examples are Bagging, Random forest, Boosting, BART (Bayesian additive regression tree), and their variants. In this paper, we propose a new perspective named variable grouping to enhance the predictive performance. The main idea is to seek for potential grouping of variables in such way that there is no nonlinear interaction term between variables of different groups. Given a sum-of-learner model, each learner will only be responsible for one group of variables, which would be more efficient in modeling nonlinear interactions.
Machine Learning Key Terminologies
Supervised learning: This involves training a model on labeled data, where the correct output is provided for each example in the training set. Common supervised learning algorithms include linear regression, logistic regression, and support vector machines. Unsupervised learning: This involves training a model on unlabeled data, with the goal of discovering patterns or structures in the data. Common unsupervised learning algorithms include k-means clustering and principal component analysis. Reinforcement learning: This involves training an agent to make decisions in an environment in order to maximize a reward. The agent receives feedback in the form of rewards or penalties for its actions. Batch learning: This involves training a model on the entire dataset at once.
Convergence rates of the stochastic alternating algorithm for bi-objective optimization
Liu, Suyun, Vicente, Luis Nunes
Stochastic alternating algorithms for bi-objective optimization are considered when optimizing two conflicting functions for which optimization steps have to be applied separately for each function. Such algorithms consist of applying a certain number of steps of gradient or subgradient descent on each single objective at each iteration. In this paper, we show that stochastic alternating algorithms achieve a sublinear convergence rate of $\mathcal{O}(1/T)$, under strong convexity, for the determination of a minimizer of a weighted-sum of the two functions, parameterized by the number of steps applied on each of them. An extension to the convex case is presented for which the rate weakens to $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{T})$. These rates are valid also in the non-smooth case. Importantly, by varying the proportion of steps applied to each function, one can determine an approximation to the Pareto front.