Data are the critical fuel for Artificial Intelligence (AI) models. Poor quality data produces inaccurate and ineffective AI models that may lead to incorrect or unsafe use. Checking for data readiness is a crucial step in improving data quality. Numerous R&D efforts have been spent on improving data quality. However, standardized metrics for evaluating data readiness for use in AI training are still evolving. In this study, we perform a comprehensive survey of metrics used for verifying AI's data readiness. This survey examines more than 120 papers that are published by ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, other reputable journals, and articles published on the web by prominent AI experts. This survey aims to propose a taxonomy of data readiness for AI (DRAI) metrics for structured and unstructured datasets. We anticipate that this taxonomy can lead to new standards for DRAI metrics that would be used for enhancing the quality and accuracy of AI training and inference.

We propose a novel gradient-based online optimization framework for solving stochastic programming problems that frequently arise in the context of cyber-physical and robotic systems. Our problem formulation accommodates constraints that model the evolution of a cyber-physical system, which has, in general, a continuous state and action space, is nonlinear, and where the state is only partially observed. We also incorporate an approximate model of the dynamics as prior knowledge into the learning process and show that even rough estimates of the dynamics can significantly improve the convergence of our algorithms. Our online optimization framework encompasses both gradient descent and quasi-Newton methods, and we provide a unified convergence analysis of our algorithms in a non-convex setting. We also characterize the impact of modeling errors in the system dynamics on the convergence rate of the algorithms. Finally, we evaluate our algorithms in simulations of a flexible beam, a four-legged walking robot, and in real-world experiments with a ping-pong playing robot.

Aspect Category Detection (ACD) aims to identify implicit and explicit aspects in a given review sentence. The state-of-the-art approaches for ACD use Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to address the problem as a multi-label classification task. However, learning category-specific representations heavily rely on the amount of labeled examples, which may not readily available in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to tackle the ACD task by combining DNNs with Gradual Machine Learning (GML) in a supervised setting. we aim to leverage the strength of DNN in semantic relation modeling, which can facilitate effective knowledge transfer between labeled and unlabeled instances during the gradual inference of GML. To achieve this, we first analyze the learned latent space of the DNN to model the relations, i.e., similar or opposite, between instances. We then represent these relations as binary features in a factor graph to efficiently convey knowledge. Finally, we conduct a comparative study of our proposed solution on real benchmark datasets and demonstrate that the GML approach, in collaboration with DNNs for feature extraction, consistently outperforms pure DNN solutions.

In some situations, the interpretability of the machine learning models plays a role as important as the model accuracy. Interpretability comes from the need to trust the prediction model, verify some of its properties, or even enforce them to improve fairness. Many model-agnostic explanatory methods exists to provide explanations for black-box models. In the regression task, the practitioner can use white-boxes or gray-boxes models to achieve more interpretable results, which is the case of symbolic regression. When using an explanatory method, and since interpretability lacks a rigorous definition, there is a need to evaluate and compare the quality and different explainers. This paper proposes a benchmark scheme to evaluate explanatory methods to explain regression models, mainly symbolic regression models. Experiments were performed using 100 physics equations with different interpretable and non-interpretable regression methods and popular explanation methods, evaluating the performance of the explainers performance with several explanation measures. In addition, we further analyzed four benchmarks from the GP community. The results have shown that Symbolic Regression models can be an interesting alternative to white-box and black-box models that is capable of returning accurate models with appropriate explanations. Regarding the explainers, we observed that Partial Effects and SHAP were the most robust explanation models, with Integrated Gradients being unstable only with tree-based models. This benchmark is publicly available for further experiments.

In the era of exceptionally data-hungry models, careful selection of the training data is essential to mitigate the extensive costs of deep learning. Data pruning offers a solution by removing redundant or uninformative samples from the dataset, which yields faster convergence and improved neural scaling laws. However, little is known about its impact on classification bias of the trained models. We conduct the first systematic study of this effect and reveal that existing data pruning algorithms can produce highly biased classifiers. At the same time, we argue that random data pruning with appropriate class ratios has potential to improve the worst-class performance. We propose a "fairness-aware" approach to pruning and empirically demonstrate its performance on standard computer vision benchmarks. In sharp contrast to existing algorithms, our proposed method continues improving robustness at a tolerable drop of average performance as we prune more from the datasets. We present theoretical analysis of the classification risk in a mixture of Gaussians to further motivate our algorithm and support our findings.

We introduce Natural Learning (NL), a novel algorithm that elevates the explainability and interpretability of machine learning to an extreme level. NL simplifies decisions into intuitive rules, like "We rejected your loan because your income, employment status, and age collectively resemble a rejected prototype more than an accepted prototype." When applied to real-life datasets, NL produces impressive results. For example, in a colon cancer dataset with 1545 patients and 10935 genes, NL achieves 98.1% accuracy, comparable to DNNs and RF, by analyzing just 3 genes of test samples against 2 discovered prototypes. Similarly, in the UCI's WDBC dataset, NL achieves 98.3% accuracy using only 7 features and 2 prototypes. Even on the MNIST dataset (0 vs. 1), NL achieves 99.5% accuracy with only 3 pixels from 2 prototype images. NL is inspired by prototype theory, an old concept in cognitive psychology suggesting that people learn single sparse prototypes to categorize objects. Leveraging this relaxed assumption, we redesign Support Vector Machines (SVM), replacing its mathematical formulation with a fully nearest-neighbor-based solution, and to address the curse of dimensionality, we utilize locality-sensitive hashing. Following theory's generalizability principle, we propose a recursive method to prune non-core features. As a result, NL efficiently discovers the sparsest prototypes in O(n^2pL) with high parallelization capacity in terms of n. Evaluation of NL with 17 benchmark datasets shows its significant outperformance compared to decision trees and logistic regression, two methods widely favored in healthcare for their interpretability. Moreover, NL achieves performance comparable to finetuned black-box models such as deep neural networks and random forests in 40% of cases, with only a 1-2% lower average accuracy. The code is available via http://natural-learning.cc.

Entity resolution (record linkage, microclustering) systems are notoriously difficult to evaluate. Looking for a needle in a haystack, traditional evaluation methods use sophisticated, application-specific sampling schemes to find matching pairs of records among an immense number of non-matches. We propose an alternative that facilitates the creation of representative, reusable benchmark data sets without necessitating complex sampling schemes. These benchmark data sets can then be used for model training and a variety of evaluation tasks. Specifically, we propose an entity-centric data labeling methodology that integrates with a unified framework for monitoring summary statistics, estimating key performance metrics such as cluster and pairwise precision and recall, and analyzing root causes for errors. We validate the framework in an application to inventor name disambiguation and through simulation studies. Software: https://github.com/OlivierBinette/er-evaluation/

Missing datasets, in which some objects have missing values in certain dimensions, are prevalent in the Real-world. Existing clustering algorithms for missing datasets first impute the missing values and then perform clustering. However, both the imputation and clustering processes require input parameters. Too many input parameters inevitably increase the difficulty of obtaining accurate clustering results. Although some studies have shown that decision graphs can replace the input parameters of clustering algorithms, current decision graphs require equivalent dimensions among objects and are therefore not suitable for missing datasets. To this end, we propose a Single-Dimensional Clustering algorithm, i.e., SDC. SDC, which removes the imputation process and adapts the decision graph to the missing datasets by splitting dimension and partition intersection fusion, can obtain valid clustering results on the missing datasets without input parameters. Experiments demonstrate that, across three evaluation metrics, SDC outperforms baseline algorithms by at least 13.7%(NMI), 23.8%(ARI), and 8.1%(Purity).

Lateralization is a fundamental feature of the human brain, where sex differences have been observed. Conventional studies in neuroscience on sex-specific lateralization are typically conducted on univariate statistical comparisons between male and female groups. However, these analyses often lack effective validation of group specificity. Here, we formulate modeling sex differences in lateralization of functional networks as a dual-classification problem, consisting of first-order classification for left vs. right functional networks and second-order classification for male vs. female models. To capture sex-specific patterns, we develop the Group-Specific Discriminant Analysis (GSDA) for first-order classification. The evaluation on two public neuroimaging datasets demonstrates the efficacy of GSDA in learning sex-specific models from functional networks, achieving a significant improvement in group specificity over baseline methods. The major sex differences are in the strength of lateralization and the interactions within and between lobes. The GSDA-based method is generic in nature and can be adapted to other group-specific analyses such as handedness-specific or disease-specific analyses.

-- The battery management system plays a vital the battery operates within its designated voltage range, preventing role in ensuring the safety and dependability of electric and overcharging or undercharging scenarios. These extremes can be hybrid vehicles. It is responsible for various functions, including detrimental to the battery's health, causing irreversible damage and state evaluation, monitoring, charge control, and cell balancing, potentially reducing its lifespan. Nonetheless, due to the Furthermore, this predictive capability contributes to the overall uncertainties surrounding battery performance, implementing enhancement of the efficiency and effectiveness of the battery these functionalities poses significant challenges. By consistently monitoring and regulating the we explore the latest approaches for assessing battery states, charging voltage in line with anticipated requirements, the BMS can highlight notable advancements in battery management systems proactively manage the battery's state of charge (SOC) and state of (BMS), address existing issues with current BMS technology, health (SOH). This proactive management allows for optimal energy and put forth possible solutions for predicting battery charging utilization, as the BMS can adjust charging and discharging cycles voltage. In essence, the research emphasizes that accurate charging voltage Keywords -- Neural Networks, Battery Management System, prediction is a linchpin for achieving several critical objectives Battery, Temperature, State of Charge, Battery charging voltage, within the realm of EV battery management. It ensures battery Machine Learning, Charge Cycle.