Statistical Learning
Export Reviews, Discussions, Author Feedback and Meta-Reviews
First provide a summary of the paper, and then address the following criteria: Quality, clarity, originality and significance. In this paper the authors analyze theoretically two common graph clustering algorithms using low rank + sparsity, showing bounds on the parameter of these methods for them to work, and they present experimental validations of the results. The paper is very well written in general, although there are some minor typos. For instance, I think that the about in line 314 should be an above. Also, it seems more reasonable to me to put subsection 3.1.1
Brain-Like Object Recognition with High-Performing Shallow Recurrent ANNs
Jonas Kubilius, Martin Schrimpf, Kohitij Kar, Rishi Rajalingham, Ha Hong, Najib Majaj, Elias Issa, Pouya Bashivan, Jonathan Prescott-Roy, Kailyn Schmidt, Aran Nayebi, Daniel Bear, Daniel L. Yamins, James J. DiCarlo
CORnet-S, a shallow ANN with four anatomically mapped areas and recurrent connectivity, guided by Brain-Score, a new large-scale composite of neural and behavioral benchmarks for quantifying the functional fidelity of models of the primate ventral visual stream. Despite being significantly shallower than most models, CORnet-S is the top model on Brain-Score and outperforms similarly compact models on ImageNet.
We thank the reviewers for their thoughtful feedback and for their appreciation of the novelty of 1 considering query-efficiency in finding homology of decision boundaries using active learning
This is an excellent point. We remark here that the same fix applied to the L ˇ C complex will help correct [3]. R3: Using topology to guide active sample acquisition. Our "model marketplace" application is different from Training classifiers with a coreset of 300 data points sampled by active learning/passive learning.