Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Statistical Learning



Export Reviews, Discussions, Author Feedback and Meta-Reviews

Neural Information Processing Systems

First provide a summary of the paper, and then address the following criteria: Quality, clarity, originality and significance. The authors propose a novel approach for hierarchical clustering of multivariate data. They construct cluster trees by estimating minimum volume sets using the q-One-Class SVM, and evaluate their method on a synthetic data set and two real word applications. While their new method seems to perform better than other approaches based on density estimation, I am not convinced by the benefits in practical applicability as the authors did not compare their method to the most commonly used hierarchical clustering techniques (agglomerative clustering with average linkage/ward). Minor comment: Rather than splitting their data once in a training and test set, the authors should perform 10-fold/5-fold cross-validation for a more reliable estimation of the generalizability of their method.



Export Reviews, Discussions, Author Feedback and Meta-Reviews

Neural Information Processing Systems

First provide a summary of the paper, and then address the following criteria: Quality, clarity, originality and significance. This paper presents a spectral clustering algorithm for the sparse degree regime (degree=\theta(1)) of the stochastic blockmodel. The authors propose an alternative to the non-backtracking operator and point out that this has similar properties as the non-backtracking operator, which has been shown to be useful in the sparse regime. But the proposed data matrix is smaller than the non backtracking operator, and symmetric, therefore making eigenvalue computation easier and more accurate. The sparse regime is indeed the hardest in terms of showing concentration of empirical eigenvalues, or performance of a clustering algorithm in the stochastic blockmodel.






Learning Rich Rankings

Neural Information Processing Systems

Although the foundations of ranking are well established, the ranking literature has primarily been focused on simple, unimodal models, e.g. the Mallows and Plackett-Luce models, that define distributions centered around a single total ordering. Explicit mixture models have provided some tools for modelling multimodal ranking data, though learning such models from data is often difficult.