Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Statistical Learning





Integral Probability Metrics PAC-Bayes Bounds

Neural Information Processing Systems

We present a PAC-Bayes-style generalization bound which enables the replacement of the KL-divergence with a variety of Integral Probability Metrics (IPM). We provide instances of this bound with the IPM being the total variation metric and the Wasserstein distance. A notable feature of the obtained bounds is that they naturally interpolate between classical uniform convergence bounds in the worst case (when the prior and posterior are far away from each other), and improved bounds in favorable cases (when the posterior and prior are close). This illustrates the possibility of reinforcing classical generalization bounds with algorithm-and data-dependent components, thus making them more suitable to analyze algorithms that use a large hypothesis space.




Supplementary to Smooth Bilevel Programming for Sparse Regularization Clarice Poon, Gabriel Peyrรฉ APseudocode for gradient descent implementation

Neural Information Processing Systems

Note that f(ฮฒt) = gt is computed either as in line 5 or line 9 of the algorithm and one can use these computations for any gradient based algorithm (e.g. Note also that this is simply gradient descent on a smooth function, and one can apply typical methods to choosing the stepsize ฮณk, such as the Barzilai-Borwein stepsize [Barzilai and Borwein, 1988]. Algorithm 1: Gradient descent implementation of Ncvx-Pro for solving Lasso. 1 initialization v0 Rn (with no zero entries), stepsize ฮณt > 0; Result: ฮฒt 2 while not converged do 3 if n6 mand ฮป>0 then 4 ut = diag(vt)X>Xdiag(vt) + ฮปId To show that i) implies ii), recall that a convex, proper and lower semicontinuous function ฯ• can be written in terms of its convex conjugate which has domain Rd . For the expression of ฯˆwhen Ris a norm,from the above, we know that ฯˆ = ( ฯ•) ( z), and recall that for any norm, R(ฮฒ) = maxR (w)61hw, ฮฒi. We derive some properties of the function h: Lemma 1.