Statistical Learning
A Network of Localized Linear Discriminants
The localized linear discriminant network (LLDN) has been designed to address classification problems containing relatively closely spaced data from different classes (encounter zones [1], the accuracy problem [2]). Locally trained hyperplane segments are an effective way to define the decision boundaries for these regions [3]. The LLD uses a modified perceptron training algorithm for effective discovery of separating hyperplane/sigmoid units within narrow boundaries. The basic unit of the network is the discriminant receptive field (DRF) which combines the LLD function with Gaussians representing the dispersion of the local training data with respect to the hyperplane. The DRF implements a local distance measure [4], and obtains the benefits of networks oflocalized units [5]. A constructive algorithm for the two-class case is described which incorporates DRF's into the hidden layer to solve local discrimination problems. The output unit produces a smoothed, piecewise linear decision boundary. Preliminary results indicate the ability of the LLDN to efficiently achieve separation when boundaries are narrow and complex, in cases where both the "standard" multilayer perceptron (MLP) and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) yield high error rates on training data. 1 The LLD Training Algorithm and DRF Generation The LLD is defined by the hyperplane normal vector V and its "midpoint" M (a translated origin [1] near the center of gravity of the training data in feature space).
Best-First Model Merging for Dynamic Learning and Recognition
"Best-first model merging" is a general technique for dynamically choosing the structure of a neural or related architecture while avoiding overfitting. It is applicable to both leaming and recognition tasks and often generalizes significantly better than fixed structures. We demonstrate the approach applied to the tasks of choosing radial basis functions for function learning, choosing local affine models for curve and constraint surface modelling, and choosing the structure of a balltree or bumptree to maximize efficiency of access.
Node Splitting: A Constructive Algorithm for Feed-Forward Neural Networks
A constructive algorithm is proposed for feed-forward neural networks, which uses node-splitting in the hidden layers to build large networks from smaller ones. The small network forms an approximate model of a set of training data, and the split creates a larger more powerful network which is initialised with the approximate solution already found. The insufficiency of the smaller network in modelling the system which generated the data leads to oscillation in those hidden nodes whose weight vectors cover regions in the input space where more detail is required in the model. These nodes are identified and split in two using principal component analysis, allowing the new nodes t.o cover the two main modes of each oscillating vector. Nodes are selected for splitting using principal component analysis on the oscillating weight vectors, or by examining the Hessian matrix of second derivatives of the network error with respect to the weight.s.
Structural Risk Minimization for Character Recognition
Guyon, I., Vapnik, V., Boser, B., Bottou, L., Solla, S. A.
The method of Structural Risk Minimization refers to tuning the capacity of the classifier to the available amount of training data. This capacity is influenced by several factors, including: (1) properties of the input space, (2) nature and structure of the classifier, and (3) learning algorithm. Actions based on these three factors are combined here to control the capacity of linear classifiers and improve generalization on the problem of handwritten digit recognition.
Iterative Construction of Sparse Polynomial Approximations
Sanger, Terence D., Sutton, Richard S., Matheus, Christopher J.
Terence D. Sanger Richard S. Sutton Christopher J. Matheus Massachusetts Institute GTE Laboratories GTE Laboratories of Technology Incorporated Incorporated Room E25-534 40 Sylvan Road 40 Sylvan Road Cambridge, MA 02139 Waltham, MA 02254 Waltham, MA 02254 tds@ai.mit.edu Abstract We present an iterative algorithm for nonlinear regression based on construction of sparse polynomials. Polynomials are built sequentially from lower to higher order. Selection of new terms is accomplished using a novel look-ahead approach that predicts whether a variable contributes to the remaining error. The algorithm is based on the tree-growing heuristic in LMS Trees which we have extended to approximation of arbitrary polynomials of the input features.
Principled Architecture Selection for Neural Networks: Application to Corporate Bond Rating Prediction
The notion of generalization ability can be defined precisely as the prediction risk, the expected performance of an estimator in predicting new observations. In this paper, we propose the prediction risk as a measure of the generalization ability of multi-layer perceptron networks and use it to select an optimal network architecture from a set of possible architectures. We also propose a heuristic search strategy to explore the space of possible architectures. The prediction risk is estimated from the available data; here we estimate the prediction risk by v-fold cross-validation and by asymptotic approximations of generalized cross-validation or Akaike's final prediction error. We apply the technique to the problem of predicting corporate bond ratings. This problem is very attractive as a case study, since it is characterized by the limited availability of the data and by the lack of a complete a priori model which could be used to impose a structure to the network architecture.
Hierarchies of adaptive experts
Jordan, Michael I., Jacobs, Robert A.
Another class of nonlinear algorithms, exemplified by CART (Breiman, Friedman, Olshen, & Stone, 1984) and MARS (Friedman, 1990), generalizes classical techniques by partitioning the training data into non-overlapping regions and fitting separate models in each of the regions. These two classes of algorithms extend linear techniques in essentially independent directions, thus it seems worthwhile to investigate algorithms that incorporate aspects of both approaches to model estimation. Such algorithms would be related to CART and MARS as multilayer neural networks are related to linear statistical techniques. In this paper we present a candidate for such an algorithm. The algorithm that we present partitions its training data in the manner of CART or MARS, but it does so in a parallel, online manner that can be described as the stochastic optimization of an appropriate cost functional.
A Network of Localized Linear Discriminants
The localized linear discriminant network (LLDN) has been designed to address classification problems containing relatively closely spaced data from different classes (encounter zones [1], the accuracy problem [2]). Locally trained hyperplane segments are an effective way to define the decision boundaries for these regions [3]. The LLD uses a modified perceptron training algorithm for effective discovery of separating hyperplane/sigmoid units within narrow boundaries. The basic unit of the network is the discriminant receptive field (DRF) which combines the LLD function with Gaussians representing the dispersion of the local training data with respect to the hyperplane. The DRF implements a local distance measure [4], and obtains the benefits of networks oflocalized units [5]. A constructive algorithm for the two-class case is described which incorporates DRF's into the hidden layer to solve local discrimination problems. The output unit produces a smoothed, piecewise linear decision boundary. Preliminary results indicate the ability of the LLDN to efficiently achieve separation when boundaries are narrow and complex, in cases where both the "standard" multilayer perceptron (MLP) and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) yield high error rates on training data. 1 The LLD Training Algorithm and DRF Generation The LLD is defined by the hyperplane normal vector V and its "midpoint" M (a translated origin [1] near the center of gravity of the training data in feature space).