Support Vector Machines
Generalization in Decision Trees and DNF: Does Size Matter?
Golea, Mostefa, Bartlett, Peter L., Lee, Wee Sun, Mason, Llew
Recent theoretical results for pattern classification with thresholded real-valued functions (such as support vector machines, sigmoid networks, and boosting) give bounds on misclassification probability that do not depend on the size of the classifier, and hence can be considerably smaller than the bounds that follow from the VC theory. In this paper, we show that these techniques can be more widely applied, by representing other boolean functions as two-layer neural networks (thresholded convex combinations of boolean functions).
Classification by Pairwise Coupling
Hastie, Trevor, Tibshirani, Robert
We discuss a strategy for polychotomous classification that involves estimating class probabilities for each pair of classes, and then coupling the estimates together. The coupling model is similar to the Bradley-Terry method for paired comparisons. We study the nature of the class probability estimates that arise, and examine the performance of the procedure in simulated datasets. The classifiers used include linear discriminants and nearest neighbors: application to support vector machines is also briefly described.
From Regularization Operators to Support Vector Kernels
Smola, Alex J., Schölkopf, Bernhard
Support Vector (SV) Machines for pattern recognition, regression estimation and operator inversion exploit the idea of transforming into a high dimensional feature space where they perform a linear algorithm. Instead of evaluating this map explicitly, one uses Hilbert Schmidt Kernels k(x, y) which correspond to dot products of the mapped data in high dimensional space, i.e. k(x, y) ( I (x) · I (y))
Generalization in Decision Trees and DNF: Does Size Matter?
Golea, Mostefa, Bartlett, Peter L., Lee, Wee Sun, Mason, Llew
Recent theoretical results for pattern classification with thresholded real-valued functions (such as support vector machines, sigmoid networks, and boosting) give bounds on misclassification probability that do not depend on the size of the classifier, and hence can be considerably smaller than the bounds that follow from the VC theory. In this paper, we show that these techniques can be more widely applied, by representing other boolean functions as two-layer neural networks (thresholded convex combinations of boolean functions).
From Regularization Operators to Support Vector Kernels
Smola, Alex J., Schölkopf, Bernhard
Support Vector (SV) Machines for pattern recognition, regression estimation and operator inversion exploit the idea of transforming into a high dimensional feature space where they perform a linear algorithm. Instead of evaluating this map explicitly, one uses Hilbert Schmidt Kernels k(x, y) which correspond to dot products of the mapped data in high dimensional space, i.e. k(x,y) ( I (x) · I (y)) (I) with I: .!Rn --*:F denoting the map into feature space. Mostly, this map and many of its properties are unknown. Even worse, so far no general rule was available.
Generalization in Decision Trees and DNF: Does Size Matter?
Golea, Mostefa, Bartlett, Peter L., Lee, Wee Sun, Mason, Llew
Recent theoretical results for pattern classification with thresholded real-valuedfunctions (such as support vector machines, sigmoid networks,and boosting) give bounds on misclassification probability that do not depend on the size of the classifier, and hence can be considerably smaller than the bounds that follow from the VC theory. In this paper, we show that these techniques can be more widely applied, by representing other boolean functions as two-layer neural networks (thresholded convex combinations of boolean functions).
Improving the Accuracy and Speed of Support Vector Machines
Burges, Christopher J. C., Schölkopf, Bernhard
Support Vector Learning Machines (SVM) are finding application in pattern recognition, regression estimation, and operator inversion for ill-posed problems. Against this very general backdrop, any methods for improving the generalization performance, or for improving the speed in test phase, of SVMs are of increasing interest. In this paper we combine two such techniques on a pattern recognition problem. The method for improving generalization performance (the "virtual support vector" method) does so by incorporating known invariances of the problem. This method achieves a drop in the error rate on 10,000 NIST test digit images of 1.4% to 1.0%.