Support Vector Machines
The Kernel Trick for Distances
A method is described which, like the kernel trick in support vector machines (SVMs), lets us generalize distance-based algorithms to operate in feature spaces, usually nonlinearly related to the input space. This is done by identifying a class of kernels which can be represented as norm-based distances in Hilbert spaces. It turns out that common kernel algorithms, such as SVMs and kernel PCA, are actually really distance based algorithms and can be run with that class of kernels, too. As well as providing a useful new insight into how these algorithms work, the present work can form the basis for conceiving new algorithms. 1 Introduction One of the crucial ingredients of SVMs is the so-called kernel trick for the computation of dot products in high-dimensional feature spaces using simple functions defined on pairs of input patterns. This trick allows the formulation of nonlinear variants of any algorithm that can be cast in terms of dot products, SVMs being but the most prominent example [13, 8]. Although the mathematical result underlying the kernel trick is almost a century old [6], it was only much later [1, 3,13] that it was made fruitful for the machine learning community. Kernel methods have since led to interesting generalizations of learning algorithms and to successful real-world applications. The present paper attempts to extend the utility of the kernel trick by looking at the problem of which kernels can be used to compute distances in feature spaces. Again, the underlying mathematical results, mainly due to Schoenberg, have been known for a while [7]; some of them have already attracted interest in the kernel methods community in various contexts [11, 5, 15].
Sparsity of Data Representation of Optimal Kernel Machine and Leave-one-out Estimator
Vapnik's result that the expectation of the generalisation error ofthe optimal hyperplane is bounded by the expectation of the ratio of the number of support vectors to the number of training examples is extended to a broad class of kernel machines. The class includes Support Vector Machines for soft margin classification and regression, and Regularization Networks with a variety of kernels and cost functions. We show that key inequalities in Vapnik's result become equalities once "the classification error" is replaced by "the margin error", with the latter defined as an instance with positive cost. In particular we show that expectations of the true margin error and the empirical margin error are equal, and that the sparse solutions for kernel machines are possible only if the cost function is "partially" insensitive. 1 Introduction Minimization of regularized risk is a backbone of several recent advances in machine learning, including Support Vector Machines (SVM) [13], Regularization Networks (RN) [5] or Gaussian Processes [15]. Such a machine is typically implemented as a weighted sum of a kernel function evaluated for pairs composed of a data vector in question and a number of selected training vectors, so called support vectors.
From Margin to Sparsity
Graepel, Thore, Herbrich, Ralf, Williamson, Robert C.
We present an improvement of Novikoff's perceptron convergence theorem. Reinterpreting this mistake bound as a margin dependent sparsity guarantee allows us to give a PACstyle generalisation error bound for the classifier learned by the perceptron learning algorithm. The bound value crucially depends on the margin a support vector machine would achieve on the same data set using the same kernel. Ironically, the bound yields better guarantees than are currently available for the support vector solution itself.
Improved Output Coding for Classification Using Continuous Relaxation
Output coding is a general method for solving multiclass problems by reducing them to multiple binary classification problems. Previous research onoutput coding has employed, almost solely, predefined discrete codes. We describe an algorithm that improves the performance of output codes by relaxing them to continuous codes. The relaxation procedure is cast as an optimization problem and is reminiscent of the quadratic program for support vector machines. We describe experiments with the proposed algorithm, comparing it to standard discrete output codes. The experimental results indicate that continuous relaxations of output codes often improve the generalization performance, especially for short codes.
Sparsity of Data Representation of Optimal Kernel Machine and Leave-one-out Estimator
Vapnik's result that the expectation of the generalisation error ofthe optimal hyperplaneis bounded by the expectation of the ratio of the number of support vectors to the number of training examples is extended to a broad class of kernel machines. The class includes Support Vector Machines forsoft margin classification and regression, and Regularization Networks with a variety of kernels and cost functions. We show that key inequalities in Vapnik's result become equalities once "the classification error" is replaced by "the margin error", with the latter defined as an instance withpositive cost. In particular we show that expectations of the true margin error and the empirical margin error are equal, and that the sparse solutions for kernel machines are possible only if the cost function is "partially" insensitive. 1 Introduction Minimization of regularized risk is a backbone of several recent advances in machine learning, includingSupport Vector Machines (SVM) [13], Regularization Networks (RN) [5] or Gaussian Processes [15]. Such a machine is typically implemented as a weighted sum of a kernel function evaluated for pairs composed of a data vector in question and a number of selected training vectors, so called support vectors.
A PAC-Bayesian Margin Bound for Linear Classifiers: Why SVMs work
Herbrich, Ralf, Graepel, Thore
We present a bound on the generalisation error of linear classifiers in terms of a refined margin quantity on the training set. The result is obtained in a PAC-Bayesian framework and is based on geometrical arguments in the space of linear classifiers. The new bound constitutes an exponential improvement of the so far tightest margin bound by Shawe-Taylor et al. [8] and scales logarithmically in the inverse margin. Even in the case of less training examples than input dimensions sufficiently large margins lead to nontrivial bound values and - for maximum margins - to a vanishing complexity term.Furthermore, the classical margin is too coarse a measure for the essential quantity that controls the generalisation error: the volume ratio between the whole hypothesis space and the subset of consistent hypotheses. The practical relevance of the result lies in the fact that the well-known support vector machine is optimal w.r.t. the new bound only if the feature vectors are all of the same length.
Support Vector Novelty Detection Applied to Jet Engine Vibration Spectra
Hayton, Paul M., Schölkopf, Bernhard, Tarassenko, Lionel, Anuzis, Paul
A system has been developed to extract diagnostic information from jet engine carcass vibration data. Support Vector Machines applied to novelty detectionprovide a measure of how unusual the shape of a vibration signatureis, by learning a representation of normality. We describe a novel method for Support Vector Machines of including information from a second class for novelty detection and give results from the application toJet Engine vibration analysis.
Regularized Winnow Methods
In theory, the Winnow multiplicative update has certain advantages over the Perceptron additive update when there are many irrelevant attributes. Recently, there has been much effort on enhancing the Perceptron algorithm byusing regularization, leading to a class of linear classification methods called support vector machines. Similarly, it is also possible to apply the regularization idea to the Winnow algorithm, which gives methods wecall regularized Winnows. We show that the resulting methods compare with the basic Winnows in a similar way that a support vector machine compares with the Perceptron. We investigate algorithmic issues andlearning properties of the derived methods. Some experimental results will also be provided to illustrate different methods. 1 Introduction In this paper, we consider the binary classification problem that is to determine a label y E {-1, 1} associated with an input vector x. A useful method for solving this problem is through linear discriminant functions, which consist of linear combinations of the components ofthe input variable.
Fast Training of Support Vector Classifiers
Pérez-Cruz, Fernando, Alarcón-Diana, Pedro Luis, Navia-Vázquez, Angel, Artés-Rodríguez, Antonio
In this communication we present a new algorithm for solving Support Vector Classifiers (SVC) with large training data sets. The new algorithm is based on an Iterative Re-Weighted Least Squares procedure which is used to optimize the SVc. Moreover, a novel sample selection strategy for the working set is presented, which randomly chooses the working set among the training samples that do not fulfill the stopping criteria. The validity of both proposals, the optimization procedure and sample selection strategy, is shown by means of computer experiments using well-known data sets.
A Support Vector Method for Clustering
Ben-Hur, Asa, Horn, David, Siegelmann, Hava T., Vapnik, Vladimir
We present a novel method for clustering using the support vector machine approach.Data points are mapped to a high dimensional feature space, where support vectors are used to define a sphere enclosing them. The boundary of the sphere forms in data space a set of closed contours containing the data. Data points enclosed by each contour are defined as a cluster. As the width parameter of the Gaussian kernel is decreased, these contours fit the data more tightly and splitting of contours occurs. The algorithm works by separating clusters according to valleys in the underlying probabilitydistribution, and thus clusters can take on arbitrary geometrical shapes.