We introduce a method of feature selection for Support Vector Machines. The method is based upon finding those features which minimize bounds on the leave-one-out error. This search can be efficiently performed via gradient descent. The resulting algorithms are shown to be superior to some standard feature selection algorithms on both toy data and real-life problems of face recognition, pedestrian detection and analyzing DNA micro array data.

Classification is achieved by a linear or nonlinear separating surface in the input space of the dataset. In this work we propose a very fast simple algorithm, based on an active set strategy for solving quadratic programs with bounds [18]. The algorithm is capable of accurately solving problems with millions of points and requires nothing more complicated than a commonly available linear equation solver [17, 1, 6] for a typically small (100) dimensional input space of the problem. Key to our approach are the following two changes to the standard linear SVM: 1. Maximize the margin (distance) between the parallel separating planes with respect to both orientation (w) as well as location relative to the origin b).

Vapnik's result that the expectation of the generalisation error ofthe optimal hyperplane is bounded by the expectation of the ratio of the number of support vectors to the number of training examples is extended to a broad class of kernel machines. The class includes Support Vector Machines for soft margin classification and regression, and Regularization Networks with a variety of kernels and cost functions. We show that key inequalities in Vapnik's result become equalities once "the classification error" is replaced by "the margin error", with the latter defined as an instance with positive cost. In particular we show that expectations of the true margin error and the empirical margin error are equal, and that the sparse solutions for kernel machines are possible only if the cost function is "partially" insensitive. 1 Introduction Minimization of regularized risk is a backbone of several recent advances in machine learning, including Support Vector Machines (SVM) [13], Regularization Networks (RN) [5] or Gaussian Processes [15]. Such a machine is typically implemented as a weighted sum of a kernel function evaluated for pairs composed of a data vector in question and a number of selected training vectors, so called support vectors.

These include face detection [14], face pose discrimination [12] and face recognition [16]. Although facial sex classification has attracted much attention in the psychological literature [1, 4, 8, 15], relatively few computatinal learning methods have been proposed. We will briefly review and summarize the prior art in facial sex classification.

An online recursive algorithm for training support vector machines, one vector at a time, is presented. Adiabatic increments retain the Kuhn Tucker conditions on all previously seen training data, in a number of steps each computed analytically. The incremental procedure is reversible, and decremental "unlearning" offers an efficient method to exactly evaluate leave-one-out generalization performance.

The Vicinal Risk Minimization principle establishes a bridge between generative models and methods derived from the Structural Risk Minimization Principle such as Support Vector Machines or Statistical Regularization. We explain how VRM provides a framework which integrates a number of existing algorithms, such as Parzen windows, Support Vector Machines, Ridge Regression, Constrained Logistic Classifiers and Tangent-Prop. We then show how the approach implies new algorithms for solving problems usually associated with generative models. New algorithms are described for dealing with pattern recognition problems with very different pattern distributions and dealing with unlabeled data. Preliminary empirical results are presented.

In this communication we present a new algorithm for solving Support Vector Classifiers (SVC) with large training data sets. The new algorithm is based on an Iterative Re-Weighted Least Squares procedure which is used to optimize the SVc. Moreover, a novel sample selection strategy for the working set is presented, which randomly chooses the working set among the training samples that do not fulfill the stopping criteria. The validity of both proposals, the optimization procedure and sample selection strategy, is shown by means of computer experiments using well-known data sets.

In theory, the Winnow multiplicative update has certain advantages over the Perceptron additive update when there are many irrelevant attributes. Recently, there has been much effort on enhancing the Perceptron algorithm by using regularization, leading to a class of linear classification methods called support vector machines. Similarly, it is also possible to apply the regularization idea to the Winnow algorithm, which gives methods we call regularized Winnows. We show that the resulting methods compare with the basic Winnows in a similar way that a support vector machine compares with the Perceptron. We investigate algorithmic issues and learning properties of the derived methods. Some experimental results will also be provided to illustrate different methods. 1 Introduction In this paper, we consider the binary classification problem that is to determine a label y E {-1, 1} associated with an input vector x. A useful method for solving this problem is through linear discriminant functions, which consist of linear combinations of the components of the input variable.

To control the walking gaits of a four-legged robot we present a novel neuromorphic VLSI chip that coordinates the relative phasing of the robot's legs similar to how spinal Central Pattern Generators are believed to control vertebrate locomotion [3]. The chip controls the leg movements by driving motors with time varying voltages which are the outputs of a small network of coupled oscillators. The characteristics of the chip's output voltages depend on a set of input parameters. The relationship between input parameters and output voltages can be computed analytically for an idealized system. In practice, however, this ideal relationship is only approximately true due to transistor mismatch and offsets. Fine tuning of the chip's input parameters is done automatically by the robotic system, using an unsupervised Support Vector (SV) learning algorithm introduced recently [7]. The learning requires only that the description of the desired output is given. The machine learns from (unlabeled) examples how to set the parameters to the chip in order to obtain a desired motor behavior.

A method is described which, like the kernel trick in support vector machines (SVMs), lets us generalize distance-based algorithms to operate in feature spaces, usually nonlinearly related to the input space. This is done by identifying a class of kernels which can be represented as norm-based distances in Hilbert spaces. It turns out that common kernel algorithms, such as SVMs and kernel PCA, are actually really distance based algorithms and can be run with that class of kernels, too. As well as providing a useful new insight into how these algorithms work, the present work can form the basis for conceiving new algorithms. 1 Introduction One of the crucial ingredients of SVMs is the so-called kernel trick for the computation of dot products in high-dimensional feature spaces using simple functions defined on pairs of input patterns. This trick allows the formulation of nonlinear variants of any algorithm that can be cast in terms of dot products, SVMs being but the most prominent example [13, 8]. Although the mathematical result underlying the kernel trick is almost a century old [6], it was only much later [1, 3,13] that it was made fruitful for the machine learning community. Kernel methods have since led to interesting generalizations of learning algorithms and to successful real-world applications. The present paper attempts to extend the utility of the kernel trick by looking at the problem of which kernels can be used to compute distances in feature spaces. Again, the underlying mathematical results, mainly due to Schoenberg, have been known for a while [7]; some of them have already attracted interest in the kernel methods community in various contexts [11, 5, 15].